Activision Blizzard Splits From Vivendi in $8.2 Billion Deal

  • 111 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Posted by Rorie (3117 posts) -
Why is Bobby smiling? (Hint: it's because he's massively wealthy.)

Companies generally tend to join together rather than grow apart. Mergers and acquisitions are far, far more common than a company actually splitting up into smaller pieces. There are exceptions everywhere, of course, but for every example like Bungie splitting away from Microsoft, there are dozens more about developers being gobbled up by a publisher. Which is one reason today's news about Activision Blizzard is so startling: in a $8.2 billion deal, the company's management has bought its freedom from the huge French company Vivendi. As of today, Activision Blizzard is an independent company.

The New York Times has plenty of details on the financial aspects of the deal, in which Vivendi will retain a 12% ownership stake in Activision Blizzard. Activision Blizzard will retain its current leadership of Bobby Kotick (CEO) and Brian Kelly (chairman). Kotick, for his part, seems optimistic about the future, as he probably should be, considering he was likely the driving force behind the split:

“We should emerge even stronger,” he said. “The transactions announced today will allow us to take advantage of attractive financing markets while still retaining more than $3 billion cash on hand to preserve financial stability.”

It's difficult to tell what this means for the future of Activision Blizzard, but at a first glance, it's probably best to guess "not much," at least from a consumer perspective. Without the oversight and red tape of a megacorporation like Vivendi above it, it's tempting to imagine that Activision Blizzard will be able to take more risks and experiment more when it comes to their game brands, but let's not kid ourselves: even without Vivendi looking over their shoulders, Activision Blizzard is still a gargantuan gaming entity. There's still going to be a Call of Duty every year, World of Warcraft will still remain the biggest MMO on the market for the foreseeable future, and the company will likely still try to make the safest bets on its megafranchises as we head into a new console generation. But it'll be interesting to see if being independent will encourage them to behave any differently than they have in the past.

#1 Posted by Lashe (1254 posts) -

Wow.

#2 Posted by Qblivion (71 posts) -

Go to bed, Rorie.

#3 Posted by FinalDasa (1893 posts) -
Moderator Online
#4 Posted by Royce_McCutcheon (213 posts) -

Probably the first step into buying up stuff and becoming a giant parent company of their own would be my guess.

#5 Edited by Zacagawea (1600 posts) -

TRICKYYY SCOOOOOOPS.

Oh wait.

#6 Edited by TechHits (1384 posts) -

lol Activision Blizzard is an indie dev.

#7 Posted by Clonedzero (4200 posts) -

Well shit, scoops!

But in Rorie context saying "scoops" might imply those silly puppy poop shovels people scoop up poop with. I don't want Rorie being implicated in puppy poo. (unless he's into that. no judgements)

RORIE REPORTS.

there we go! Good job rorie!

#8 Edited by YukoAsho (2078 posts) -

So, what happens to Vivendi now? Do they just exit gaming entirely? Do they form another publishing arm?

#9 Edited by MechaKirby (235 posts) -

Does this mean Crash Bandicoot is now a free agent or what?

#10 Posted by Rorie (3117 posts) -

@yukoasho: I have a feeling they were just looking to get out of gaming entirely. I'm betting their small investment in the new A/B is good enough for them for now.

#11 Posted by Colourful_Hippie (4420 posts) -
#12 Posted by Example1013 (4834 posts) -
#13 Posted by Juda (45 posts) -

btw if you dislike the french so much, feel free to knock down the greatest sign of american-ism there is, since the french gave it to you. Yea, the statue of liberty.

#14 Edited by Colourful_Hippie (4420 posts) -

@juda said:

btw if you dislike the french so much, feel free to knock down the greatest sign of american-ism there is, since the french gave it to you. Yea, the statue of liberty.

It's a joke dude, calm down. Sounds like you need to go to bed too.

#15 Posted by Wilshere (324 posts) -

Day one DLC for everybody!

#16 Posted by Malarkain (105 posts) -

Now Activision Blizzard just needs a few years and they can buy EA!

#17 Posted by sissylion (679 posts) -

8.2 billion fucking dollars. I declare that to be an illegal amount of money.

#19 Posted by Stimpack (902 posts) -

What? What?

#20 Posted by DrDarkStryfe (1140 posts) -

This is pretty major news. Vivendi could not unload Activision Blizzard after trying for over a year, and there was a risk that they could have broken them up and sell it off piecemeal. It will be interesting to see if things will be different now that they do not have to answer to a conglomerate that was in financial turmoil.

#21 Edited by StarvingGamer (8380 posts) -
#22 Posted by thainatos (116 posts) -

Holy shit.

#23 Posted by kkotd (314 posts) -

This is actually probably the best news that Activision Blizzard Inc. have seen in a while. Black Ops 2 while selling alot, wasn't the crazy hit they wanted and WoW is down to 7mil people. This on top of formed Blizzard designers being told that Vivendi was more intrusive than Activision ever could be... Yeah, taking them out of the picture is nothing but a good thing.

#24 Posted by Siphillis (1296 posts) -

What a wonderful headline.

#25 Posted by Hailinel (25179 posts) -

Oh my stars and garters.

#26 Posted by Slab64 (1059 posts) -

MY FIGHT MONEYYY

#27 Posted by Rorie (3117 posts) -

@juda: That was totally a joke! I was more playing on the notion of COD players probably being the same kind of people who make surrender jokes about French people. Hard to parse that out in such a small window of text, I know.

Trust me, I love the French. I don't think most Americans know that there probably wouldn't be a U.S. without the French intervention in the Revolutionary War. Consider me a Francophone. Er, Francophile. Or whatever.

#28 Posted by Sweep (8927 posts) -

3 billion in cash to retain stability? Is that a lot? I mean... relatively speaking? Because it sounds like a lot.

When people start talking about numbers that high I just automatically substitute those numbers for dollar signs.

Moderator
#29 Posted by YukoAsho (2078 posts) -

@rorie said:

@yukoasho: I have a feeling they were just looking to get out of gaming entirely. I'm betting their small investment in the new A/B is good enough for them for now.

Can't help but wonder why they were set to leave a super-profitable company, though. Other posts here suggest that Vivendi is in trouble... Maybe they needed some quick money for some reason...?

#30 Posted by Colourful_Hippie (4420 posts) -
#31 Edited by AMyggen (3341 posts) -

@juda said:

btw if you dislike the french so much, feel free to knock down the greatest sign of american-ism there is, since the french gave it to you. Yea, the statue of liberty.

You've got to be kidding me...

#32 Posted by Agamemnon (33 posts) -

So. . . Blizzard is firmly in the clutches of Activision then. Oh joy.

#33 Edited by crimsonlordofwar (140 posts) -

So does this mean I don't have to hear about CoD 24/7 on gametrailers

#34 Posted by ZombiePie (5710 posts) -

I bet you that Vivendi moves to sell their stake in Universal Music Group soon as well.

Moderator
#35 Posted by RPGee (759 posts) -

First time I read 8.2 billion dollars, it went straight past my head. Now I can't read it without going "That is so much money!"

My word, that's a lot of money.

#36 Edited by LibrorumProhibitorum (349 posts) -

All it takes is a single mistake and you wont have that "financial stability" anymore.

#37 Posted by Demoskinos (15019 posts) -
#38 Edited by Blu3V3nom07 (4235 posts) -

Fuck, again. I bet this is gonna take a while for the money to settle. I think I'm buying Ghosts this year. :)

#39 Posted by RudeTrooper (30 posts) -

who cares???????

will it make any of the games better or worse? no!

a few big stock owners cashed out before others knew what happened.

start the death clock when people/investors realize WoW and CAD has moved out of popularity

#40 Posted by Adaptor (186 posts) -

Sounds like a good thing to me. Slightly less giant conglomerates are better for consumers in the long run.

#41 Edited by Oldirtybearon (4851 posts) -

I remember hearing word that the deal ActiBlizz made with Vivendi was coming to a head soon. The article wondered aloud just how much ActiBlizz would pay Vivendi to get the fuck away from that toxic hell hole. I had no idea that they'd be willing to spend $8.2 billion, but apparently the ransom was worth paying.

Very interesting to see where this company goes from here.

#42 Posted by SonofSeth (90 posts) -

@juda said:

btw if you dislike the french so much, feel free to knock down the greatest sign of american-ism there is, since the french gave it to you. Yea, the statue of liberty.

And this is why no one likes the french.

#43 Posted by Eurobum (247 posts) -

A note on why this is happening. Activision had "had $4.3 billion in cash and cash equivalents at the end of March, but $2.7 billion is held offshore and would be subject to U.S. taxes if repatriated, according to company filings." [Source]

So they took approximately 4.6 Billion in loans, in order to not pay tax now or ever, going from a most profitable company to one that is ravaged by debt (at least on paper). Vivendi was happy to dump them as the price and success of Blizzard is likely to have peaked or maybe they just needed cash.

For the new investors buying an indebted company is very attractive as it still may increase in stock price, even without massive profits.

Personally I never quite understood why exactly it's better to pay to the banks rather than the tax man, I guess the answer is that you get a much better deal. All that money that ended up in France, in turn "Laid low by struggles at its main telecommunications unit, Vivendi has begun selling off stakes in various companies to pay down debt and help refashion itself into a leaner media company." [Source]

Another thing I'm ignorant about is whether or not it is legal for banks to both lend money to and hold shares of a company like Blizzard. Still the question remains on how these guys cash out the profits, they probably spend and overcharge the expenses in countries where the tax rate is low, in countries with outsourced development studios.

#44 Posted by paparoach (70 posts) -

my opinion

#45 Edited by KaneRobot (1689 posts) -
@juda said:

btw if you dislike the french so much, feel free to knock down the greatest sign of american-ism there is, since the french gave it to you

The French did not give the United States the American flag. Now go chill the fuck out for a while and reevaluate if you should be coming to this particular site with your lack of any sense of humor.

#46 Edited by Abendlaender (2838 posts) -

So....ermm does this mean anything? Probably not right? At least for "us"

#47 Posted by IronScimitar (501 posts) -

stalks.

#48 Posted by Winternet (8025 posts) -

What does Vivendi even do in this day and age?

#49 Posted by Sackmanjones (4742 posts) -
#50 Posted by Dick_Mohawk (379 posts) -

A Rorie Story.

Cool.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.