58 Game Informer
No full review to read as it is a magazine - but ouch. Will this be the low point and they will get better?
Game » consists of 15 releases. Released Feb 16, 2010
Yeah, I'm expecting 7s pretty much across the board. That isn't necessarily a dealbreaker for me, I'm huge Alien/Predator fan and have enjoyed the demo just for the atmosphere. Just hoping the other play modes are a little less frustrating... Consider me on the fence at this stage.
We'll just play some games whilst we wait:" Yeah, I'm expecting 7s pretty much across the board. That isn't necessarily a dealbreaker for me, I'm huge Alien/Predator fan and have enjoyed the demo just for the atmosphere. Just hoping the other play modes are a little less frustrating... Consider me on the fence at this stage. "
" @Workyticket said:Never checkmate a guy with a nuclear bomb strapped to his wrist." Yeah, I'm expecting 7s pretty much across the board. That isn't necessarily a dealbreaker for me, I'm huge Alien/Predator fan and have enjoyed the demo just for the atmosphere. Just hoping the other play modes are a little less frustrating... Consider me on the fence at this stage. "We'll just play some games whilst we wait:
"
To be honest the reviews sounded kinda dodgy. It's complaints were the motion sensor picking up enemies, predators using stealth rather than brute and Aliens climbing walls can get disorientating(which is like all other AvP's)...so I might wait for other reviews.
D: Damn, I was really looking forward to this. I will probably get it anyways. The online demo is fine on 360, and extremely fun for me.
" I take GI is a joke and would never go on something they say, but I myself stand disappointed with the gameplay from playing the MP demo. I'm gonna rent the game still, but its a little to watered down from the original for my taste. "And how is GI a joke? Because their opinions on games differ from yours?
Yeah, just the fact that you had to reply to me with that as your first claim is enough reason to not actually give you a legitimate obvious answer. Go figure it out. And Rebellion made the first AvP, and it was a really good game. This one is definitely not as good gameplay wise to me anyway as the first. They have gone downhill at this point." @pause422 said:
" I take GI is a joke and would never go on something they say, but I myself stand disappointed with the gameplay from playing the MP demo. I'm gonna rent the game still, but its a little to watered down from the original for my taste. "And how is GI a joke? Because their opinions on games differ from yours? AvP was made by Rebellion. Rebellion is not a good developer. Therefore, is anyone really surprised by this? "
"A lot of these dude's complaints are just horrible. Like the motion tracker. And complaining that the Predator relies on stealth. And the fact that he can't handle the wall-crawling. I think this will score in the 60s-80s but this guy's depth as a game reviewer is suspect. "
" @PercyChuggs said:Go figure it out? So am I supposed to go through 200 issues of Game Informer, and analyze why they, accoring to you, are a joke?Yeah, just the fact that you had to reply to me with that as your first claim is enough reason to not actually give you a legitimate obvious answer. Go figure it out. And Rebellion made the first AvP, and it was a really good game. This one is definitely not as good gameplay wise to me anyway as the first. They have gone downhill at this point." @pause422 said:
" I take GI is a joke and would never go on something they say, but I myself stand disappointed with the gameplay from playing the MP demo. I'm gonna rent the game still, but its a little to watered down from the original for my taste. "And how is GI a joke? Because their opinions on games differ from yours? AvP was made by Rebellion. Rebellion is not a good developer. Therefore, is anyone really surprised by this? "
After only playing the demo - To me this looks like a last gen game. The graphics and movement are quite poor. Even the sound is bad. The pulse rifle sounds cheap and hollow. I didn't expect this to be great given Rebellion's recent form, but it's a shame none the less. A wasted opportunity.
" GameInformer says it's bad? Well I'm buying it for sure now. "Wow. You buy things that Game Informer says are good, and you also buy things that they say are bad. For someone who has no respect for their publication, they sure have a lot of control over your purchasing decisions.
" After only playing the demo - To me this looks like a last gen game. The graphics and movement are quite poor. Even the sound is bad. The pulse rifle sounds cheap and hollow. I didn't expect this to be great given Rebellion's recent form, but it's a shame none the less. A wasted opportunity. "The pulse rifle sounds that way because that's what it sounds like in the movies. Also, I don't understand everyone saying the graphics are bad... they are fine.
Screw Game Informer. They gave Army of Two a bad rating as well and I loved that game, and I've been having a blast with the demo. Each character truly feels different from the other, and it makes a fun and exhilarating time for me. First day buy for me after spending so much time on the demo.
that's too bad, I though the multiplayer demo was pretty fun, but at the same time I could see it getting old really quick. It still made me excited to try the single player though, now not so much.
" Already bought it, and as a AvP fan I can say that I am happy with my purchase. "Can I ask you where you bought it?
I wasn't expecting this game to be that great anyways but it would a shame if it just turned out like crap.
" @Toxic said:I got it of steam (Pre-order)" Already bought it, and as a AvP fan I can say that I am happy with my purchase. "Can I ask you where you bought it? "
Here is the review if someone want to read it
http://gamegrep.com/showimage.php?pos=1&newsid=29601
A bit strange to say that a campaign "sucks" without giving a reason and he is really nitpicky on some of the things he mentions.
His comments on the multiplayer portion are ridiculously short. "Nothing feels fresh and the SP problems carry over". Seriously? That's it? No more detail?
I haven't even played the demo yet but this review is kinda crummy. Spends seventy-percent of it talking about the campaigns and about a sentence on the MP. Hmm.
" Here is the review if someone want to read it http://gamegrep.com/showimage.php?pos=1&newsid=29601 A bit strange to say that a campaign "sucks" without giving a reason and he is really nitpicky on some of the things he mentions. "Probably because "gamegap" is some random dude's game blog, not a review site.
I think the game is full of details, the graphics are more than awesome and it gives a perfect experience of each faction.
I've seen many people in the demo as Aliens just running and fighing as they were humans, the real fun comes turning off the lights and running through ceiling attacking from the dark.
Besides the atmosphere, the deathmatch demo doesn't represent the stronger aspects of this game very well. I'm going to play the single player campaigns, sure, but I'm really getting this game for the Predator Hunt, Alien Infestation and four player co-op survival modes. Those are the things that, in my mind, make this game unique. As long as they pulled these parts off, I'll be happy.
The problem with that review is, the guy states his gripes and then instead of explaining them in detail he just clunkily shifts to the next complaint. Not a single positive point either, even something superficial for the sake of balance. The game basically got a 6 (I give no truck to this .75 bullshit), which on a scale of 10 makes it average - not great, yet hardly the disaster he makes it out to be. A game that gets 6 has to have SOMETHING going for it, and it's a reviewer's job to explain what it is.
And okay, it's an advance copy and the guy probably didn't get to play it online but one sentence for the MP? It's only the basic reason most people are BUYING the bloody game!
I'm enjoying the demo and will most likely pick it up for the other online modes, but I'm expecting middling review scores. All the same, that thing reads like either someone had either cut out the last 2-300 words of each paragraph, or GI have started ripping off their review copy from NeoGaf posts.
After playing the demo for some kind, I was actually really looking forward to this game. I don't know if the single-player will hold up, but MP definitely feels fun with the drastically different (but surprisingly balanced) 3 species to play as.
I'll wait for the IGN, Gametrailers, and GB (if there is one), reviews before I make a final decision, but I'm not completely discouraged. Still looking forward to this.
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment