Well, that answer is obviously the second one. Alpha Protocol is a game that totally has its merits and its moments, but the problem is that those merits and moments are
First off, the story, and because I feel like building something up before I wreck it, I'll start with the positives. What it does right is make your choices feel like they have impact, and it pulls it off well (regardless of whether they actually have impact or not). I generally went out of my way to not piss people off, and that usually paid dividends with less people generally trying to shoot me. At least, until the end when I kind of capped everyone I had the opportunity to. They all deserved it. The game also does a pretty good job at avoiding black and white morality, and acknowledging your prior actions when people speak to you. At no point did any of that feel particular or contrived, at least until the end when it all goes to shit. Maybe it was the way I rushed through the endgame, or the choices I made, but a lot of story threads that I read about (on "the internets") never cropped themselves up, and at the end I wasn't entirely sure what my Thorton had accomplished. It left a bad taste in my mouth.
However, something that isn't modern (oh snap. That was a transition), is the gameplay. Somehow, the shooting in Alpha Protocol makes the gunplay in the first Mass Effect look like Gears by comparison. Apparently, a trained special agent is incapable of hitting the broad side of a barn with an assault rifle, and when he does hit the enemies still all take forever to murder. The part where the enemy AI is totally retarded doesn't help either, occasionally rushing up to you and doing melee attacks for no reason. However, this retarded AI is more of a problem when you play stealth, as I did. It's erratic, unpredictable, and always catches you in the worst time. At least, until you unlock the power that makes you invisible. The ultimate version lasts 24 seconds and allows you to stab as many people in the neck as possible within its time limit. This kind of doubles as easy mode, but that doesn't make any of it actually fun. So, in conclusion, the gameplay is bad. Not unabashedly awful, but it's the same kind of bad that made Jade Empire's gameplay bad (A lot of this game is really "Jade Empire bad"). The best missions are the ones that are just roleplaying encounters because they don't involve shooting or sneaking.
In conclusion, it's pretty obvious that Alpha Protocol was developed as a direct response to Mass Effect. No doubt tired of being every other RPG company's bitch, Obsidian tried to put it's own foot forward and tripped into a spike pit... or wherever this metaphor goes. However, probably due to some sort of internal development struggle, and probably some other excuses too, it fails to reach the mark it aimed for, being generally Sub-Mass Effect 1 in pretty much everything (not to mention Mass Effect 2). And know what? That's a shame. The things this game does right are things that other RPGs haven't really managed to do. In some crazy alternate universe, I could see this game being totally jaw-dropping. Yeah. Now if you'll excuse me, I think I'll go play some New Vegas.
Next up: I don't know. Maybe KotOR? Maybe Icewind Dale?
EDIT: Oh yeah. Before I forget. The Boss Battles are universally terrible and should die in a fire. Take everything I said about the combat and multiply it by a factor of two (oh, so you are going to rush me and take half my health with a melee attack? Glorious) Especially the last one. Perfect examples of how not do design a game.
Log in to comment