Being developed by Visceral Games

#1 Posted by Barrock (3545 posts) -

And that kind of bums me out. I really like what they have done with Dead Space, and to see them get assigned to this kinda sucks.

#2 Posted by Jeff (3626 posts) -

This is "Visceral Montreal." Different dudes.

Staff
#3 Edited by Barrock (3545 posts) -

@Jeff said:

This is "Visceral Montreal." Different dudes.

Oh, is it? What has Montreal worked on previously?

Wikied it... Did they just rename EA Montreal Visceral? So the same studio that developed the previous Army of Two games is working on this one?

#4 Posted by SurferZ (92 posts) -

So Visceral is the new Bioware?

#5 Posted by iAmJohn (6128 posts) -

I'm still trying to process the fact that they're trying another Army of Two game.

#6 Posted by Barrock (3545 posts) -

It appears that it is being developed at EA Montreal who developed the previous games. Visceral Montreal is a part of EA Montreal so I guess they are basically just using the Visceral name.

#7 Posted by Crixaliz (782 posts) -

Looks like its going to be running on the Frostbite 2 engine. Dated March 2013.

Seems to still be focusing on two-player coop (split-screen supported), no mention of the rumored four-player coop.

#8 Posted by Grissefar (2842 posts) -

@Jeff said:

This is "Visceral Montreal." Different dudes.

Wow thanks for clarifying, man. Can you perhaps also clarify why Ryan would say on the Bombcast that DS3 has a new studio? To this day, I still can't figure out what he meant. Is that Dino guy not still working on the UI?

#9 Posted by Napalm (9020 posts) -
#10 Posted by Barrock (3545 posts) -
#11 Posted by Napalm (9020 posts) -

@Barrock said:

@Napalm said:

Or you guys could just totally ignore my topic. That works too, I guess.

I made mine first. ;)

By two minutes, and you didn't bother sourcing a news article or posting any information which facilitated discussion. So, pat yourself on the back.

#12 Posted by jakob187 (21691 posts) -

@Jeff said:

This is "Visceral Montreal." Different dudes.

The guys behind Dante's Inferno were also different dudes.

#13 Posted by Barrock (3545 posts) -

@Napalm said:

@Barrock said:

@Napalm said:

Or you guys could just totally ignore my topic. That works too, I guess.

I made mine first. ;)

By two minutes, and you didn't bother sourcing a news article or posting any information which facilitated discussion. So, pat yourself on the back.

No need to be that way. I'm merely stating that I didn't post in your thread because when I looked your thread didn't exist yet. Had it existed I wouldn't have created this topic.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.