Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

178 Comments

Steam Introduces Family Sharing

Share your Steam library with up to 10 friends. This could be big.

No Caption Provided

Just in time for Steam’s 10th anniversary, Valve has announced a program with potentially huge ramifications down the digital road: family sharing.

The basic idea is that it’ll soon be possible to authorize your library to be shared with up to 10 other people. You cannot just share a single game but the whole library. Let’s say you authorize your brother. If your brother wants to play Papers, Please through your shared account but you’re down for some Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 at the same time, he’s kicked off and told he has to purchase Papers, Please on his own account. If you’re not playing, though, he can keep going.

This takes some obvious idea off the table pretty quickly. You cannot purchase one copy of a co-op game and play through it with a friend.

The big question: does this require people to be playing on the same PC? The above example makes that seem obvious, but strangers things have happened. The FAQ for family sharing mentions that it’s possible to authorize “up to 10 devices at a given time,” which would suggest one PC could act as a host library for 10 other computers. I’ve asked Valve for clarification on this, since it has the broadest ramifications for this.

It’s also currently unclear how this would impact Steam’s offline mode, or if developers would have the option of opting-out of participation.

As it stands, Valve is already saying not every game can be a part of this. Games that require “third-party key, account, or subscription in order to play cannot be shared between accounts.”

You will, however, be able to access downloadable content already purchased for a game.

The idea of sharing your digital games became a topic of conversation earlier this year, as Microsoft flirted with the idea for Xbox One. As a result of its massive turnaround on DRM policies, however, these potentially progressive and interesting ideas were kicked down the road.

Family sharing will enter into beta next week, with 1,000 users on Steam gaining access.

More information is available on Valve's official page, which also includes a detailed FAQ.

No Caption Provided

Patrick Klepek on Google+

178 Comments

Avatar image for deactivated-64162a4f80e83
deactivated-64162a4f80e83

2637

Forum Posts

39

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

I think what people are failing to understand is people weren't upset at Microsoft introducing this method of sharing, I think a lot of people liked the news, but the fact it was the digital restrictions put in place which meant they had to put the system in place. PC Games have been digital for so long, with an audience that is used to this, and in an eco-system where games are cheaper as a result and that's why it seems like it's being accepted more.

Avatar image for goker
Goker

5

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Don't know if anybody pointed this out, but...

I realized the nefarious plot Valve has set up. Valve takes a minimum cut of all Steam card sales. Most go for a few pennies and valve gets just 15% of it, but the minimum Valve gets off each transaction is always 1 cent (it's safe to assume the other penny fee is going towards card/paypal fees Valve has with them or something similar). This many new cards would saturate market with the value 7 or 8 cent cards (the average) going down to 4. That's quite a drop off, but Valve is only making a penny off the 7/8 cent cards and would make that same amount if it's only worth 4 cents. So if they get plenty of people earning and buying and selling new cards, they've created a much bigger revenue stream through sheer number of new cards being earned and sold.

Also, I fully expect others to create dummy account to re-earn new cards to "trade" to their main account and sell them from there. You know people will do it. People will want to do it, and Valve wants you to do it as well.

Has it been said that borrowers can receive cards from borrowed games? Don't remember reading anything about that on the info page.

Also, Valve does not take 15% of card sales. I think 10% of that goes to the developer.

Avatar image for joey_ravn
JoeyRavn

5290

Forum Posts

792

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

@jdh5153 said:

Microsoft does it and people flip out saying it's bad. Steam does it and everyone's excited. Bunch of hypocrites. But hey at least I can sell my used game on Steam....oh wait.

Different platforms, different plans, different markets, different players. What Microsoft wanted to do was to completely remove the option of selling used games from its system, and the account sharing stuff only worked locally. Are you saying you honestly can't see the difference between that and Steam's approach? We know you hate PC gaming, but, come on... it's something so basic and obvious that it goes beyond your blind fanboyism!

Avatar image for manatassi
Manatassi

789

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Manatassi

@joeyravn said:

@jdh5153 said:

Microsoft does it and people flip out saying it's bad. Steam does it and everyone's excited. Bunch of hypocrites. But hey at least I can sell my used game on Steam....oh wait.

Different platforms, different plans, different markets, different players. What Microsoft wanted to do was to completely remove the option of selling used games from its system, and the account sharing stuff only worked locally. Are you saying you honestly can't see the difference between that and Steam's approach? We know you hate PC gaming, but, come on... it's something so basic and obvious that it goes beyond your blind fanboyism!

ok no need to be a jerk about it guys. He actually has a perfectly valid point, Microsoft were trying to emulate Steam with their policies very directly.

I think the real point of contention is that people still trust Valve... they had an extremely bumpy controversial time launching Steam. Valve however weren't launching their own hardware platform and could afford to push through all the negativity and earn the trust they now have. Microsoft on the other hand have not earned anyones trust over the way their digital distribution methods work. Games on Demand prices are still absurdly high compared to retail prices and the confusing profile system still in effect on the 360 doesn't help matters.

Its not that Microsoft didn't have some good ideas they just went about communicating them very badly and haven't put the work in to earn the consumer trust that would allow them to go ahead with these kinds of policies. They backed down as a bumpy launch for a console along side its competitor would have been suicide... shortsighted on their part really.

Avatar image for tebbit
tebbit

4659

Forum Posts

861

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 6

It's really strange that people's primary complaint is that you can't share a game with someone and continue playing a different game.

Let's look at the issue for Valve here:

1. Valve needs money to operate

2. If no restrictions on access to games that other users haven't purchased exist, Valve and other publishers are going to lose money, because one person is charged, and 9 others are given a free, unadulterated game.

3. ???

4. Profit... or lack thereof.

You can't just say "Well I want all these rights to play these games", when you just don't own those rights, for better or worse. It's a little depressing, but Valve is kinda being generous by allowing non-purchasing users to play the entirety of the game for essentially free - even if that player is not earning cards or achievements for their own account.

Avatar image for lazyaza
Lazyaza

2584

Forum Posts

7938

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 43

How come I get a feeling the same people that Buuh'd the Xbox One DRM stuff are going to Hurray! at this news... It's an odd world, the world.

Except this was the one and only good idea MS had for their bs online stuff. A tiny miniscule gleam of sunlight amongst a sea of liquid shit. And then they dropped the feature, and now Valve is doing it, and on PC no less. It's almost hilarious.

Avatar image for evercaptor
Evercaptor

436

Forum Posts

3014

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Evercaptor

@lazyaza said:

@squaretheroot said:

How come I get a feeling the same people that Buuh'd the Xbox One DRM stuff are going to Hurray! at this news... It's an odd world, the world.

Except this was the one and only good idea MS had for their bs online stuff. A tiny miniscule gleam of sunlight amongst a sea of liquid shit. And then they dropped the feature, and now Valve is doing it, and on PC no less. It's almost hilarious.

Which is funny again because Microsoft was implementing Steam in all but name until people booed it off the system entirely. Truly odd.

Avatar image for fminus
FMinus

410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By FMinus

@xbob42 said:

@fminus said:

This is pretty useless as some have mentioned. When you share, you're locked out of your whole library.

The fuck are you talking about? You're never locked out of your own library. If someone's using your library and you log in, they get a few minutes to buy the game or exit it. There's a big difference between deciding to stay off so your wife can play and being "locked out."

What's the point of sharing it in the first place.

"Yeah sorry, dad/niece/friend/etc., I know I said you could play that Call of Duty game, but I really need to play Prison Architect, so yeah, go buy your own CoD or just wait couple of hours until I finish my sessions."

There really isn't a difference between being locked out and deciding to stay off. If you're not a complete asshole, you know you wont just kick your family members from the games just so you can play.

So yes, it's pretty much the same as it is now, when someones logged to your account, you can't do shit with all the 200+ games you have on it, when you log in, the other guy is kicked out and you take over the control of the library.

Where the hell is the difference if they allow per-game selection of sharing and letting you play other non-shared games in that library or the whole library and making it inaccessible in the mean time.

Developers/Publishers wont get more money either way, I bought the games already, the one whos playing them wont spend a penny.

All this is, is an easier way to share your account, without Steam Guard annoying you with emails with codes to unlock it, it's not like people are not sharing their accounts now.

Avatar image for peritus
peritus

1155

Forum Posts

175

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

I think what people are failing to understand is people weren't upset at Microsoft introducing this method of sharing, I think a lot of people liked the news, but the fact it was the digital restrictions put in place which meant they had to put the system in place. PC Games have been digital for so long, with an audience that is used to this, and in an eco-system where games are cheaper as a result and that's why it seems like it's being accepted more.

Exactly.

Avatar image for bread_harrity
Bread_Harrity

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Steam introduces.... pregnant controllers!

Avatar image for zevvion
Zevvion

5965

Forum Posts

1240

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 2

@fminus said:

@xbob42 said:

@fminus said:

This is pretty useless as some have mentioned. When you share, you're locked out of your whole library.

The fuck are you talking about? You're never locked out of your own library. If someone's using your library and you log in, they get a few minutes to buy the game or exit it. There's a big difference between deciding to stay off so your wife can play and being "locked out."

What's the point of sharing it in the first place.

"Yeah sorry, dad/niece/friend/etc., I know I said you could play that Call of Duty game, but I really need to play Prison Architect, so yeah, go buy your own CoD or just wait couple of hours until I finish my sessions."

There really isn't a difference between being locked out and deciding to stay off. If you're not a complete asshole, you know you wont just kick your family members from the games just so you can play.

So yes, it's pretty much the same as it is now, when someones logged to your account, you can't do shit with all the 200+ games you have on it, when you log in, the other guy is kicked out and you take over the control of the library.

Where the hell is the difference if they allow per-game selection of sharing and letting you play other non-shared games in that library or the whole library and making it inaccessible in the mean time.

Developers/Publishers wont get more money either way, I bought the games already, the one whos playing them wont spend a penny.

All this is, is an easier way to share your account, without Steam Guard annoying you with emails with codes to unlock it, it's not like people are not sharing their accounts now.

What? I can't believe you don't understand what the difference is. The difference between locked out and not locked out is that when you are locked out you cannot access your games and when you aren't you can. It's not rocket science. I share my games with my friends and they can try out whatever I have or play it. When I log in, they're booted out and I play. If I shared my password, they could do with my account whatever they want, they would unlock achievements I didn't earn, they would add game time that isn't mine and most importantly, if I wanted to play I need to ask them nicely to log out so I can log in.

What the difference is? Everything. I'm not giving anyone my password and change my stats in the process, not to mention having to trust them with it. I would totally share my library though and it would be awesome to try out the games someone else has bought.

I almost can't believe you think this is a bad thing.

Avatar image for icaria
Icaria

196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

So how long until someone starts a cross-globe buddy finding thread on the forums where people list the GMT times when they're likely to be using Steam?

Avatar image for wrighteous86
wrighteous86

4036

Forum Posts

3673

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

Edited By wrighteous86

@evercaptor said:

@lazyaza said:

@squaretheroot said:

How come I get a feeling the same people that Buuh'd the Xbox One DRM stuff are going to Hurray! at this news... It's an odd world, the world.

Except this was the one and only good idea MS had for their bs online stuff. A tiny miniscule gleam of sunlight amongst a sea of liquid shit. And then they dropped the feature, and now Valve is doing it, and on PC no less. It's almost hilarious.

Which is funny again because Microsoft was implementing Steam in all but name until people booed it off the system entirely. Truly odd.

The answers to your persecution complex can be seen throughout this comment thread. It wasn't the same, it isn't the same, and the thing people like here is something they liked in the One.

@aerobatics said:

So what's the difference between this and just sharing a steam account?

You don't have to share your account information and CC, essentially. Otherwise, not much. Just makes it a little easier.

Avatar image for gildermershina
Gildermershina

411

Forum Posts

361

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@katelyngadd said:

The fact that it locks you out of ALL the games on your account makes it a pretty useless feature. I don't understand why they buried that detail in the FAQ instead of making it obvious: That is, this is basically just Valve finally adding a form of multiple sign in, so you can have your games accessible from multiple machines without them getting signed out, and nothing more. It barely addresses any of the use cases addressed by say, the family sharing mechanics Microsoft was promising for XBox One.

I'm not even sure why it has to work this way. I can understand some games not supporting this because publishers got antsy, but it's insane that I still have 100+ games on my account I've paid for, but I can only play them on one machine at a time, no matter what, because I get locked out of my steam account on other machines. My friends who want to play games while their husbands/wives play other games have to buy two copies or buy games outside of steam or use offline mode. It's nuts.

I wouldn't say it makes it useless, but yeah, this is a nice idea that has some way to go. Digital lending is in its infancy, though, give it time.

Avatar image for bawlzinmotion
BawlZINmotion

704

Forum Posts

2025

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 1

Now all I need is a license trade-in program and I'll be happy. I have a lot of stuff I no longer play or want, and would love to get out of my Steam library. If I could get a little something back towards something new, that would be awesome.

Avatar image for bawlzinmotion
BawlZINmotion

704

Forum Posts

2025

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 1

Now all I need is a license trade-in program and I'll be happy. I have a lot of stuff I no longer play or want, and would love to get out of my Steam library. If I could get a little something back towards something new, that would be awesome.

Avatar image for oursin_360
OurSin_360

6675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

lol, this makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, the xbone version was way better. Only issue people had with that was that all games were considered digital downloads even if you bought the disk. Only reason i put up with steam is because i don't know anybody with a computer decent enough to even trade games with anyway, they all console game.

Avatar image for chilipeppersman
chilipeppersman

1319

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 4

Edited By chilipeppersman

@joeyravn: indeed it is. hopefully gta V comes to the pc!

Avatar image for zaldar
zaldar

1127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

How do you sign up for the beta....?

Avatar image for crithon
crithon

3979

Forum Posts

1823

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 11

I'm more curious to see what other company is going to adopt this same policy later. Valve always feels like it's dipping it's toe into something too scared to fallow through, but recently they don't seem that conservative with their policies and programs.

Avatar image for lordandrew
LordAndrew

14609

Forum Posts

98305

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 36

It sounds like just a more secure way of sharing your account. It's not much, but better than sharing your password. Will we ever get something closer to what Xbox One was supposed to have? Maybe in the future, but not yet.

Avatar image for alexglass
AlexGlass

704

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By AlexGlass

Still no clarification on whether sharing different games from the same library simultaneously is possible?

Nobody's tried contacting Steam?

Avatar image for evercaptor
Evercaptor

436

Forum Posts

3014

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

So what's the difference between this and just sharing a steam account?

I can still play my Bioshock Infinite, while my brother can play my SpaceChem or SMB

@lazyaza said:

@squaretheroot said:

How come I get a feeling the same people that Buuh'd the Xbox One DRM stuff are going to Hurray! at this news... It's an odd world, the world.

Except this was the one and only good idea MS had for their bs online stuff. A tiny miniscule gleam of sunlight amongst a sea of liquid shit. And then they dropped the feature, and now Valve is doing it, and on PC no less. It's almost hilarious.

Which is funny again because Microsoft was implementing Steam in all but name until people booed it off the system entirely. Truly odd.

Avatar image for forcen
Forcen

2746

Forum Posts

29709

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 31

Edited By Forcen

@alexglass: You share the whole library or nothing. One player at a time per library. So if you share to 10 friends only one of you can play from your library at once.

Avatar image for egelstern
Egelstern

2

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This is just another sales approach, nothing more. You can try your friends games however if you want to play something full time you need to buy it. That is it. Nice "buy and try" with social aspect as you want to play with your friends.

I honestly doubt that you will be allowed to share the library without being locked out. It would violate many licensing agreements. Valve being what it is still is to small to battle top production studios.

Avatar image for wolf3
Wolf3

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'm confused...right now you can install Steam on as many computers as you want, but it can't run at the same time...okay, I guess that's what this is dealing with then, you can still install it wherever you want, and this is something different...

Not bad, so long as you the account holder can deauthorize someone!