Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

97 Comments

The Details On Command & Conquer 4

We get an up-close look at what could be Kane's final ride into the sunset.


This big walker gets big holes blown in it as it takes enemy fire, making for an impressive demo of the game's graphical capabilities.
This big walker gets big holes blown in it as it takes enemy fire, making for an impressive demo of the game's graphical capabilities.
When it was first announced that a team at EALA was developing Command & Conquer 4 for release on PC in 2010, it felt like too much, too soon. Since the 2007 release of Command & Conquer 3, that studio has produced two full RTS games, each with its own expansion pack. I suppose I had just gotten a little RTS'd out. That's why EALA's recent visit to our office with a playable version of Command & Conquer 4 turned out to be such a pleasant surprise. The structure of the game looks like a pretty serious departure from what series fans are used to, which could shake things up in a way that appeals to new players while still offering enough of what makes C&C tick to keep the existing players on-board.

The big thing that first struck me about watching C&C4 in action is that it looks like a quicker, more nimble game than its predecessors. This game isn't about building a big base, entrenching, and sending out waves of units to secure your expansion across the map. Heck, in C&C4, you don't even really build a base. Instead, you're working with the crawler, a mobile construction unit that can build all of your other units while rolling around the battlefield. The catch is that it can only store four units while moving. So you'll have to deploy the crawler to let your units out onto the map. This means you aren't building war factories and barracks to build your combat units. Your crawler handles all of that for you. On top of that, if the crawler gets destroyed, it'll respawn, letting you continue the battle.

So without building structures and teching-up in the traditional fashion, unit selection is now handled by a class type, selected when you spawn your crawler. The offense class gets the heaviest units. The defense class gets infantry units, but can also build defensive turrets, useful for guarding locations. The support class controls the skies with its aircraft and can also buff other units with special abilities. But you won't have immediate access to the game's most powerful units. You'll have to earn them.

A look at the game's HUD. In-mission FMV holographically pops up above the unit box in the lower-right corner instead of blocking your view of the map. 
A look at the game's HUD. In-mission FMV holographically pops up above the unit box in the lower-right corner instead of blocking your view of the map. 
Command & Conquer 4's experience system is persistent across every mode in the game, from the campaign to offline skirmish matches to online play. An on-screen experience bar lets you know how close you are to the next level, and gaining levels confers benefits in the form of additional units, support powers, and other abilities. There will be multiple ways to gain experience, including the elimination of enemy units, completing objectives, and so on. It sounds like the developers are still determining whether players will have one experience level overall or one level per class.

The multiplayer gameplay in C&C4 will allow for two teams of five to face off in objective-based matches. One such mode will place a number of control points around the map, giving defensive players something to guard while offensive players head out to conquer additional control points. This sounds like it'll really take advantage of the class-based systems in place. Additionally, you'll be able to change classes between spawns, but changing classes will destroy any units you may have on the battlefield to prevent players from simultaneously controlling units from different classes.

The mysterious thing about Command & Conquer 4 seems to be the number of playable factions, but maybe I'm just reading into this. EA is only committing to two factions--GDI and Nod, naturally--but executive producer Mike Glosecki, who came by to show us the game, said that they're only confirming the two main factions "at this time." Take that how you will, I'm probably making a big deal out of nothing... right? Either way, it left me wondering about whatever happened to the Scrin, the alien race that debuted in C&C3. As Command & Conquer 4 is being billed as the conclusion of the series' main story, we'll probably be able to see all of those loose ends tied up when the game is released in 2010.    
Jeff Gerstmann on Google+

97 Comments

Avatar image for jeff
jeff

6357

Forum Posts

107208

Wiki Points

176248

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 20

Edited By jeff

This big walker gets big holes blown in it as it takes enemy fire, making for an impressive demo of the game's graphical capabilities.
This big walker gets big holes blown in it as it takes enemy fire, making for an impressive demo of the game's graphical capabilities.
When it was first announced that a team at EALA was developing Command & Conquer 4 for release on PC in 2010, it felt like too much, too soon. Since the 2007 release of Command & Conquer 3, that studio has produced two full RTS games, each with its own expansion pack. I suppose I had just gotten a little RTS'd out. That's why EALA's recent visit to our office with a playable version of Command & Conquer 4 turned out to be such a pleasant surprise. The structure of the game looks like a pretty serious departure from what series fans are used to, which could shake things up in a way that appeals to new players while still offering enough of what makes C&C tick to keep the existing players on-board.

The big thing that first struck me about watching C&C4 in action is that it looks like a quicker, more nimble game than its predecessors. This game isn't about building a big base, entrenching, and sending out waves of units to secure your expansion across the map. Heck, in C&C4, you don't even really build a base. Instead, you're working with the crawler, a mobile construction unit that can build all of your other units while rolling around the battlefield. The catch is that it can only store four units while moving. So you'll have to deploy the crawler to let your units out onto the map. This means you aren't building war factories and barracks to build your combat units. Your crawler handles all of that for you. On top of that, if the crawler gets destroyed, it'll respawn, letting you continue the battle.

So without building structures and teching-up in the traditional fashion, unit selection is now handled by a class type, selected when you spawn your crawler. The offense class gets the heaviest units. The defense class gets infantry units, but can also build defensive turrets, useful for guarding locations. The support class controls the skies with its aircraft and can also buff other units with special abilities. But you won't have immediate access to the game's most powerful units. You'll have to earn them.

A look at the game's HUD. In-mission FMV holographically pops up above the unit box in the lower-right corner instead of blocking your view of the map. 
A look at the game's HUD. In-mission FMV holographically pops up above the unit box in the lower-right corner instead of blocking your view of the map. 
Command & Conquer 4's experience system is persistent across every mode in the game, from the campaign to offline skirmish matches to online play. An on-screen experience bar lets you know how close you are to the next level, and gaining levels confers benefits in the form of additional units, support powers, and other abilities. There will be multiple ways to gain experience, including the elimination of enemy units, completing objectives, and so on. It sounds like the developers are still determining whether players will have one experience level overall or one level per class.

The multiplayer gameplay in C&C4 will allow for two teams of five to face off in objective-based matches. One such mode will place a number of control points around the map, giving defensive players something to guard while offensive players head out to conquer additional control points. This sounds like it'll really take advantage of the class-based systems in place. Additionally, you'll be able to change classes between spawns, but changing classes will destroy any units you may have on the battlefield to prevent players from simultaneously controlling units from different classes.

The mysterious thing about Command & Conquer 4 seems to be the number of playable factions, but maybe I'm just reading into this. EA is only committing to two factions--GDI and Nod, naturally--but executive producer Mike Glosecki, who came by to show us the game, said that they're only confirming the two main factions "at this time." Take that how you will, I'm probably making a big deal out of nothing... right? Either way, it left me wondering about whatever happened to the Scrin, the alien race that debuted in C&C3. As Command & Conquer 4 is being billed as the conclusion of the series' main story, we'll probably be able to see all of those loose ends tied up when the game is released in 2010.    
Avatar image for coltonio7
Coltonio7

3214

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By Coltonio7

Persistence!? In an RTS!?  Every mode!?
 
Sounds rad =D

Avatar image for daryl
Daryl

1776

Forum Posts

178

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Daryl

yawn.

Avatar image for seedofpower
Seedofpower

4138

Forum Posts

6866

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Seedofpower

God, EA. Please stop.

Avatar image for vorbis
Vorbis

2762

Forum Posts

967

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Edited By Vorbis

HUD is all wrong, wheres the sidebar?

Avatar image for chewii101
chewii101

874

Forum Posts

3965

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By chewii101

Wtf. Come on. I going to sound like an old turd but EA has really fucked up this once awe-inspiring franchise. They're trying to cram in Company of Heroes/Dawn of War's style while trying to please the old fans but really, they just ruined it all together. Ugh. This just pisses me off. 

Avatar image for ashbash
ashbash

429

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ashbash

I really want to get into a RTS but I just can't be bothered to learn a new type of game genre from scratch. I don't think I'll be bothering with this title.

Avatar image for kolonel_kool
Kolonel_Kool

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Kolonel_Kool
@Chewii101 said:
" Wtf. Come on. I going to sound like an old turd but EA has really fucked up this once awe-inspiring franchise. They're trying to cram in Company of Heroes/Dawn of War's style while trying to please the old fans but really, they just ruined it all together. Ugh. This just pisses me off.  "
True, true.
Avatar image for civvie
Civvie

97

Forum Posts

110

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Civvie

Sooooo I cant use a mamoth walker from the start because i need to LVL myself up to use it ? Am I reading that right?

Avatar image for rasgueado
Rasgueado

838

Forum Posts

2324

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

Edited By Rasgueado

Sounds like they took a cue from some aspects Homeworld has.

Avatar image for incrediblebulk92
IncredibleBulk92

948

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

Edited By IncredibleBulk92

Seems to me more like a World in Conflict style game, 4 classes to fight as each with different units and abilities that rely on each other to function effectively.  Think I'd rather have more World in Conflict tho 2bh. 
 
Weird how last week they were talking about NOD and GDI forging an alliance to save the world and this week their releasing screenshots of them fighting.  Not like I actually expected this to be a damn greenpeace clean up the planet game or something.

Avatar image for th3_james
Th3_James

2616

Forum Posts

27

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Th3_James

>_>

Avatar image for citizenkane
citizenkane

10894

Forum Posts

29122

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 106

Edited By citizenkane

 

GDI Mastadon
GDI Mastadon

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
This reminds me of the AT-AT in the Empire Strikes Back.
Avatar image for crusnchill
crusnchill

871

Forum Posts

170

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Edited By crusnchill

Guys! don't decide yet. Do what I'm going to do. which is, take a wait and see approach.
Avatar image for delta_ass
delta_ass

3776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 7

Edited By delta_ass
@CitizenKane said:
"  
GDI Mastadon
GDI Mastadon
        This reminds me of the AT-AT in the Empire Strikes Back. "
I thought that as well, good sir.
Avatar image for ineedaname
Ineedaname

4276

Forum Posts

410

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By Ineedaname

Every game is an RPG these days.

Avatar image for dane
Dane

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Dane

i love greg kasavin

Avatar image for gargantuan
Gargantuan

1907

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Gargantuan

This looks really interesting. I might have to buy it. hmm, Now I want to buy C&C 3 too.

Avatar image for ridebird
RIDEBIRD

1302

Forum Posts

25

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 7

Edited By RIDEBIRD

Well, it doesn't seem you've played every C&C, ever, like me. This series needs a goddamn reboot, and I'm glad they did it. RA3 is great and awesome but it does feel a bit old really, even though they did alot of new stuff there too. C&C3 was just Generals in a new costume, which was fine but didn't exactly entice the mind.

Avatar image for sunking
SunKing

715

Forum Posts

215

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 1

Edited By SunKing

I liked DoW and CoH for their gameplay and unique focus on units, upgrades and levelling system, special abilities, tactical cover, etc. I like C&C for its base building, teching, turtling, resource mining, massing, big-ass superweapons and units. That's what C&C is – or used to be, at least. 
 
From your limited description of the game mechanics, it's really just sucked out my  enthusiasm for the game big-time. It may end up being a good, or even great, game, but it's not really the type of RTS I'd want C&C to be. 
 
That's just an initial reaction, anyway. Maybe the idea will grow on me. At the moment, though, count me unimpressed. :(

Avatar image for dagas
dagas

3686

Forum Posts

851

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 8

Edited By dagas

Another game for the 'modern generation' read people that all have attention defecit disorder. What happened to RTS games being about building a base and making strategic decisions? These days you need the reflexes of an FPS guy and the multi-tasking of an air traffic controller. Each unit has to have a billion different skills you need to micro. Soon you'll need to manually wipe their butt before a battle and babysit them so they don't kill themselves because you didn't touch them for 5 seconds. It used to be you could sit back and enjoy a nice little mind battle with a friend. Now it's rushing after 1min of gameplay and constant adrenaline pumping and everything is over after 5min as if you were playing Quake 3.
 
I blame the Zerg!

Avatar image for stinky
stinky

1564

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By stinky

bit early for me to pass judgement, but after playing 3 they had to do something. it was getting old.

Avatar image for nick69
nick69

639

Forum Posts

2703

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By nick69

it sounds interesting. I might pick it up

Avatar image for joeh
JoeH

213

Forum Posts

162

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 2

Edited By JoeH

For me CnC3 and RA3 were the last RTS warriors amongst a sea of action games masquerading as RTS *cough*DoW2, WiC*cough*. But now, they have to jump on the band wagon.
 
I'm still open to this game, but instead of leaping blindly into this game as i did with previous ones. I shall tread carefully as not to crack my skull on the rocks of dumbed down RTSs.

Avatar image for jambones
Jambones

1726

Forum Posts

10015

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 2

Edited By Jambones

Haven't played C & C since the first Red Alert, so I doubt this would affect players like me. I just think the whole shift to everyone making 'baseless' RTSs a bit strange.

Avatar image for joeh
JoeH

213

Forum Posts

162

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 2

Edited By JoeH

Worst thing about this is that the base RESPAWNS. One of the main tactics of CnC and RA is to destroy their MCV, then cranes, then war factories. But this time it's ok because EA is here to cater to the casual gamers! YAY! Don't worry if your base blows up, you get a new one!

Avatar image for caseylakes
caseylakes

301

Forum Posts

80

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By caseylakes

I do not like the sound of the crawler.

Avatar image for babblinmule
babblinmule

1280

Forum Posts

46

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Edited By babblinmule
@Ertard said:
" Well, it doesn't seem you've played every C&C, ever, like me. This series needs a goddamn reboot, and I'm glad they did it. RA3 is great and awesome but it does feel a bit old really, even though they did alot of new stuff there too. C&C3 was just Generals in a new costume, which was fine but didn't exactly entice the mind. "
I think this man has hit the nail squarely on the head. Honestly, the series has been doing the same thing for the last 14 years, and despite how much I love the series, it needs a bit of a shake up.
Avatar image for sunking
SunKing

715

Forum Posts

215

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 1

Edited By SunKing
@JoeH said:
" Worst thing about this is that the base RESPAWNS. One of the main tactics of CnC and RA is to destroy their MCV, then cranes, then war factories. But this time it's ok because EA is here to cater to the casual gamers! YAY! Don't worry if your base blows up, you get a new one! "
It can't be how it appears. I have a hard time believing that blowing up an enemy's MCV won't effectively end the game.
Avatar image for drik
drik

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By drik
@Ineedaname said:
" Every game is an RPG these days. "
I say that every day, I`m sick and tired of this trend.
Avatar image for joeh
JoeH

213

Forum Posts

162

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 2

Edited By JoeH
@SunKing: I really do hope that it isn't like it sounds... Otherwise this game is gonna suck.
Avatar image for sunking
SunKing

715

Forum Posts

215

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 1

Edited By SunKing
@babblinmule: I just think they need to give the series a break. It will be twelve years after the original Starcraft when its sequel comes out. EA could learn a thing or two from Blizzard in this sense.
Avatar image for sharpshooter
Sharpshooter

914

Forum Posts

876

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Sharpshooter

I like the idea of the "Mobile base" , for lack of a better term. It seems like a natural evolution of the universe. SInce Tiberium is taking over the world people won't want to set up expensive military bases in areas where the "green death" is growing. So now instead of just the MCV moving out when Tiberium gets too close the whole base just walks out of the area. Maybe I'm reading too much into this but I like the way this sounds.

Avatar image for waffles13
Waffles13

622

Forum Posts

128

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Waffles13
@dagas said:
" Another game for the 'modern generation' read people that all have attention defecit disorder. What happened to RTS games being about building a base and making strategic decisions? These days you need the reflexes of an FPS guy and the multi-tasking of an air traffic controller. Each unit has to have a billion different skills you need to micro. Soon you'll need to manually wipe their butt before a battle and babysit them so they don't kill themselves because you didn't touch them for 5 seconds. It used to be you could sit back and enjoy a nice little mind battle with a friend. Now it's rushing after 1min of gameplay and constant adrenaline pumping and everything is over after 5min as if you were playing Quake 3.  I blame the Zerg! "
Wholeheartedly agree. I loved Tiberian Sun and RA2, the C&C games I grew up with. Hell, I loved supreme commander because even though to be good you needed to micro the hell out of it, I just liked building a giant goddamn army and then nuking the shit out of an enemy. It was FUN, dammit, not some giant test of skill like every game needs to be these days. I want a game that I can play in a laid back manner against computers or friends, none of this anonymous tournament scene bullshit that C&C has been about since 3.
Avatar image for xiemos2
Xiemos2

232

Forum Posts

30

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Xiemos2

Mehhhhhhhhhhh.

Avatar image for lemon360
lemon360

1231

Forum Posts

353

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 2

Edited By lemon360
@dagas said:
" Another game for the 'modern generation' read people that all have attention defecit disorder. What happened to RTS games being about building a base and making strategic decisions? These days you need the reflexes of an FPS guy and the multi-tasking of an air traffic controller. Each unit has to have a billion different skills you need to micro. Soon you'll need to manually wipe their butt before a battle and babysit them so they don't kill themselves because you didn't touch them for 5 seconds. It used to be you could sit back and enjoy a nice little mind battle with a friend. Now it's rushing after 1min of gameplay and constant adrenaline pumping and everything is over after 5min as if you were playing Quake 3.  I blame the Zerg! "
don't even try to blame zerg
Avatar image for rjmacready
RJMacReady

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By RJMacReady

EA RTS spam, no thanks.

Avatar image for deactivated-5c5cdba6e0b96
deactivated-5c5cdba6e0b96

8259

Forum Posts

51

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 3


No thanks, I'm waiting for Starcraft 2.
Avatar image for ryanwho
ryanwho

12011

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ryanwho

So I can't tell, are the bitches bitching because 'omg they tried something new' or 'omg same old thing' or 'omg never played one but Starcraft 2 is around the corner so fuck this'? Just wondering.

Avatar image for reverseface
Reverseface

1222

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Reverseface

You don't build a base?? Ok i'm out.. DoW 2 tried to do that and it was utter shite.
Avatar image for ryanwho
ryanwho

12011

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ryanwho

Turtling for ten minutes then taking your bulked out swarm to the enemy home base. That doesn't even sound like a game. Are people bitching because they can't turn C&C into a none game anymore?

Avatar image for lasafrog
lasafrog

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By lasafrog

EA < R-TARDS 
 
 
Kasavin get out while you can. You're too good to belong to that bozo operation.
Avatar image for tekmojo
tekmojo

2365

Forum Posts

104

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

Edited By tekmojo

Called it, EA backing down from RTS, doesn't surprise me, even though these new details sound horrible, it's better than what C&C has been in the past. Still, that isn't the greatest compliment.

Avatar image for turambar
Turambar

8283

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Turambar
@SunKing: Oh give it up.  Any changes to the game's formula does not automatically mean "lol, god damn casuals."
Avatar image for oldmanlight
OldManLight

1328

Forum Posts

177

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 9

Edited By OldManLight

seems like they're missing the point.  people like c&c because they like playing that type of game.  If they want to build a dawn of war 2 using the C&C name, it should at least be treated as a spinoff.  not this abomination of a sequel.  i personally have always liked the base building aspect of C&C ever since i played the 1st one in DOS way back when,  sucks to see a series like love do stuff like this.  To be honest, I barely had enough time to get tired of C&C3 before red alert 3 came along so this is a definite non-buy for me.

Avatar image for peredur
Peredur

34

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Peredur

Hey, I just want to see what Joe Kucan's going to do. That man knows spectacle.

Avatar image for pibo47
Pibo47

3238

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Pibo47

I am soooooooooo pumped for this game!

Avatar image for arbitrarywater
ArbitraryWater

16104

Forum Posts

5585

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 66

Edited By ArbitraryWater

Sounds cool. Despite what many people say, the RTS genre certainly needs a breath of fresh air (since every single RTS since 1998 has used the StarCraft model)

Avatar image for joeh
JoeH

213

Forum Posts

162

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 2

Edited By JoeH
@ArbitraryWater: Fresh air? You do realise that the class system is sounding extremely similar to world in conflict and that just about every RTS released over that past 5 years has taken giant leaps away from the classic model? Which is why CnC3 and SupCom were such good games. If you want your "fresh air" go look at DoW2, CoH or WiC. Just don't try to erode away CnC with "fresh air"
Avatar image for sunking
SunKing

715

Forum Posts

215

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 1

Edited By SunKing
@Turambar: Maybe you were replying to someone else, but I didn't say that.