Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

184 Comments

Worth Reading: 01/04/13

What's up, 2013? Bring in the new year's slew of unnecessary life changes with a batch of very necessary games, articles, links, and even top 10 lists that aren't awful.

No Caption Provided

So, 2012, it’s over. Blah. You’re gone. I can’t say I’m too upset about having 2012 in the rearview mirror, even if there was plenty to celebrate about those 12 months. I’m just happy to be moving forward, and can begin enacting change for the better, based on my time spent thinking about the recent past.

Sure, most of that’s going to happen in my personal life, but given how intertwined my personal life is with my professional life, that also means change for Giant Bomb--and my approach to news. When I first got here, I was hired as a news and features guy, and that was my role for the first few months. There weren’t enough podcast microphones to have me on the Bombcast regularly, but the office bought another one, and that changed. I’d drop into Quick Looks every so often just to fill in, but as it became clear there were games I was interested in looking at that no one else was, that changed, too. It all started to add up, and while I’m still regularly writing features for the site, it doesn’t happen enough, and I certainly do not have the time to spend doing background reporting on truly big stories.

That’s gonna change in 2013 in ways that will become evident in the next few months, I hope, and doesn’t really have much to do with shifting my day-to-day interaction with the site and you guys. It’s mostly making adjustments to operate more efficiently (ie: using a service to transcribe my interviews to get the writing part started sooner), and maybe bringing in outside writers to report on material that I have no interest in or time to tackle.

We’ll see. I’m only sharing some of these ideas with you to let you know it’s a new year, and while everyone talks about it being a time for change, I’d actually like some of it to happen. And, yes, that includes getting that PC. I already have the CPU and GPU, just need to get the rest. Soon, I think. Spookin' With Scoops will return, then, too.

Hey, You Should Play This

No Caption Provided

I may or may not have gone slightly overboard with the horror coverage on Giant Bomb in 2012, so I had every intention of opening Worth Reading in 2013 without a single reference to a horror game. Then, of course, I landed upon this terrific point-and-click adventure game about escaping the confines of serial killer, and absolutely had to share it with you. Killer Escape has an awful name, but Psionic Games has done a masterful job of establishing a sense of dread in a game with largely simple, static visuals. The damn game even managed to pull off a terrific jump scare out of nowhere, and I suspect you won’t see it coming, either. The whole experience doesn’t last more than 20 minutes or so (if you’re stuck: spiderwebs), but a timer ticks and tocks in the corner of your inventory, instilling a constant sense of “oh, shit, will the killer actually come back?” as you desperately click your way out.

And You Should Read These, Too

No Caption Provided

What brings pleasure to some will bring pain to others, as evidenced by this stunning essay about the negative role video games have played in his life. Granted, were games not around, it’s entirely possible Duahmel would have substituted them for a different form of fantasy and escapism, but today, the medium of choice for many is video games. We do not spend much time thinking about the consequences of the games we make and the games we play, and I’m troubled by the industry’s obsession with the word “addictive” and making games “addictive.” It’s not to suggest video games are “bad,” only that maybe there may, in fact, be “bad” things about games. The worlds we create and the mechanics we design that are beloved by most may bring out the worst in others. Should it matter?

The difference between my own experience, and that of a typical hyper-successful ivy-league-bound student is that my sense of self was built around fabricated success. Video games present a fictitious sense of trial that produce a baseless sense of accomplishment. Saving the world feels like it’s worthy of note but it is simply the outcome for every person who plays the game and doesn’t turn off the console.

I chose to define myself by my gaming successes as a way of displacing the definition given to me by my circumstances. This has brought with it all the consequences Deresiewicz describes, but without any of the benefits gained from the hard work real-world success requires. I still craved the type of success that Ivy League schools looked for, but the ease with which I could turn on a video game and feel successful without any of the work was (and still is) incredibly difficult to pass up.
No Caption Provided

Gavin Purcell likely speaks for many of us when he talks his guilt from playing with the popular iOS word game Letterpress in 2012. I went through a similar psychological arc years ago when Words With Friends, and it surfaced some of my worst tendencies. It’s awfully easy to start a game with someone, but I’d usually never make it past the second turn. Then, you’re trying to avoid the messages from people asking you to keep playing, and you resent the game, the concept of push notifications, and, ultimately, your friends. Terrible! I don’t blame people for giving up.

I take so long to play? Well, guess what, dude, I’m busy. I put in long days at work. I have to buy things from time to time. I eat. I have a family. And I was just told by my own children to put the iPhone down. So, yes, I take my time.

The interchange gnawed at me. This was an entirely new development. Guilt. Anger. Betrayal. All because I wouldn’t play this dumb little iPhone game. Looking back, my friend probably did care about what was happening in my life at the time but he was blinded himself. He just wanted to play his turn.

If You Click It, It Will Play

I Don’t Know About This Kickstarter Thing, But These Projects Seem Pretty Cool

  • The campaign to raise funds for a sequel to The Ship went nowhere, and the developers share lessons.
  • Full Bore started as a simple action game, but it's growing bigger. Looks like this has potential.
  • I'm so glad Dreadline didn't disappear into the ether. This ghostly game looks fantastic.

Maybe Every Top 10 List Doesn't Have to be the Absolute Worst

Valve Just Launched Greenlight, So Here’s Some Games That Don’t Look Terrible

  • KRUNCH looks just like the kind of assholishly hard nostalgia I haven't experienced in a while.
  • I don't know what to make of people saying They Breathe is genuinely horrifying, but I gotta find out why.
  • In 2013, I will play more couch co-op games, and maybe Super Motherload can help in that quest.

Patrick's Watching TED Talks As Part of a New Years Resolution, So Here You Go

Oh, And This Other Stuff

Patrick Klepek on Google+

184 Comments

Avatar image for endurancefun
EnduranceFun

1116

Forum Posts

223

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By EnduranceFun

So basically Patrick is writing less news and appearing in more videos, and they're paying for a replacement to do the old news job? Correct me if I'm wrong.

Like, that may be the very worst thing I've ever heard, I think? I only ever supported Patrick at all because he facilitated the unwanted news guy role. If he's now full on 'member of the crew' a la Ryan when he's awful at videos and the podcast, that's pretty atrocious. I know plenty of you guys just love how he runs around in circles in quick looks, states incorrect factoids far more than anyone else in videos and talks over everyone else with his inane blabber... but if they're really giving him even less of a real job then I can see myself unsubscribing, as I don't know if I can take more of his entitled bullshit. I'll wait and see but this really cuts the mustard.

Also still waiting on a reply to the 3,200 baited comments, Klepek.

@Xeirus said:

It always cracks me up when people do this, who cares...

Who cares if the editor knows how to write English. Not like that's a requirement for being a journalist, pshaw.

Avatar image for brewster
brewster

258

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By brewster

Love that article on the Big bang Theory. Eloquently put what I'd been thinking about the show far far better than I ever could articulate.

Avatar image for dixavd
Dixavd

3013

Forum Posts

245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Dixavd

@Itwastuesday said:

blagh I never like it when intellectuals publicly denounce the idea of schooling. I understand their point, and I understand that US public schools are fucked, but then dumb people take their message and run with it and are like "YEEEAaahhh i dont need college im dropping out" without any good alternative ideas, and then people I know end up with dead end jobs that they post about on Facebook. Shoulda just gone to school, man!

Edit- thanks for linking the Morrowind article, if there's one thing I've loved more than Morrowind, it's reading about other people who love Morrowind.

Are you talking about that TED link or some others response to it. Because that TED talk isn't about denouncing schooling in any way. Its entire point is that schooling is one of the most significant things that we as a society have to do and that refusing to change foundations with in it simply because they have been that way for so long is absurd. And why mention "interllectuals"? The entire point of the talk is saying that every person has the capacity of understanding and no segmented group deserves any right to control what happens within the educational system.

I think you have completely missed the entire point of the piece (and don't take this as me attacking you or anything, if you simply had a problem with its ultimate message I wouldn't have responded - but what you have a problem with has no basis in what its actual aim was).

Avatar image for kwang2000
kwang2000

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By kwang2000

@GrantHeaslip said:

if we're expected to take Giant Bomb seriously as a journalistic entity

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Is this your first time on the site? This is a website where a bunch of grown men fart around and play video games, not the New York Times. Their mascot is a deer in a luchador mask. They sell tee shirts with the slogan "Fuck Ryan Davis" on them. Come on, dude.

Avatar image for auron570
AURON570

1778

Forum Posts

1029

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By AURON570

So if will there be a Walking Dead Episode 5 article?

Avatar image for antipunk217
Antipunk217

90

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Antipunk217

Shining Force II remains my favorite game of all time.

Avatar image for paulwade1984
paulwade1984

493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By paulwade1984

So what exactly will you be doing now Patrick? You mention what you won't be doing anymore, but what's going to fill your time void? I'm hoping all will become apparent when the new site launches. Nobody really seems to do much of anything around giant bomb anymore. This site has a massive rift where content used to be.

Avatar image for spidergoat
Spidergoat

130

Forum Posts

38

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

Edited By Spidergoat

@GrantHeaslip said:

@Pingu44 said:

To the people bitching about grammatical issues:

That you should be so bothered by this should be cause for concern.

You are not forced to read this.

You are getting this content for free, to complain about it is nothing short of lunacy, or perhaps I was the only person who was taught the proverb that you should never look a gift horse in the mouth?

Grammar != journalism. I would read the most typo laden, error filled piece of shit ever if it was, for example, a breakdown of Duke Nukem Forever's creation. Don't confuse what you had to do in your English language class at school with some actual reportage.

There's probably numerous errors in this post. Well guess what you pedants, I don't care. I wish I could live in a world in which my greatest concern was the grammatical accuracy of a news post about video games that I was able to read for free, but unfortunately I have some far more important problems, such as how my fridge is so far away from my computer I'm going to have to get up to get a beer now. Holy shit people, the GB community is so much better than this. Stop embarrassing yourselves.

I'm paying for it, but even I weren't, I don't think that would be a catch-all excuse. I'm perfectly capable of enjoying Patrick's stories despite my problems with his writing, but what you're saying isn't that different than saying "hey, this game's struggles to maintain 20 FPS, crashes once an hour, and shouldn't have been shipped in this state, but that doesn't matter because it's really otherwise awesome!

Let's put this another way: I don't need every game I play to keep a consistent 30+ FPS, but I know that there are many who do, and I don't think they're being pedantic.

We all care about video games and hold them to (often unreasonable) standards — I don't get why holding the people who write about them to grade school standards is "lunacy."

But you aren't paying for it. This is free content. Your membership doesn't get you access to this any more than mine does. Comparing this to a poorly made game is ludicrous based on the fact that you actually have to pay to play that game. Now, if you want to bitch about a members only video or something, then fine, be my guest. I won't necessarily agree with you but you're entitled to do so.

You're very much comparing apples to oranges. Do you often find yourself bitching about the quality of freely available flash games, or free to play, ad supported Facebook junk, wondering why they aren't as good as <insert big budget game/franchise you like here>? There's key differences here. One costs you money to access. One does not. To complain about something that is both free and optional is as far as I can determine lunacy, and this post (as are all of the news posts, I'm fairly certain) is exactly that.

Now for what it's worth I found no error in the post whatsoever, but what do I know? I never went to 'grade' school, but then I also spell words like 'colour' and 'honour' correctly.

Avatar image for insanejedi
insanejedi

781

Forum Posts

777

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

Edited By insanejedi

Of what... Cross-Promoting real firearms and edged tools in their games from SOG And McMillan? I'm not totally sure how that's indecent.

"OH BUT SANDY HOOK SHOOTING. IT'S SO DISRESPECTFUL!"

And a week before that it wasn't? What's so wrong with it right now that it was okay a month ago? It's such a childish notion to censor stuff because of recent events, but it's okay after a several months or a year after it has happened.

Is it always indecent? I suppose we shouldn't have games like Assassin's Creed which fictionalize very brutal and immoral campaigns of the Crusades, or demonize the Catholic Church because it's insensitive.

If you are also one of those people who think that crossing the threshold between real life guns and video games, then I suppose we shouldn't have name brand guns in video games as well because THAT'S crossing the line between real life and video games. No HK MP5s, no AK-47s. You want to believe kids don't get into guns because of video games? Go talk to any gun store in your city, I GUARANTEE you some people have walked in and wanted a "Deagle" or "Glock 18" or Kriss Vector Because they loved in Counter-Strike or Call of Duty.

I'm not saying it's wrong for kids to be into guns because of video games. But it's a really childish notion to have this moral inconstancy against Video game companies and firearm companies like Mcmillian (Who only do Bolt action guns by the way) cross promoting when the entire real life firearm list in a video game is basically one big ad.

Avatar image for natetodamax
natetodamax

19464

Forum Posts

65390

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 5

Edited By natetodamax

That Ken Robinson talk about creativity in schools is fantastic.

Avatar image for legendarychopchop
LegendaryChopChop

1387

Forum Posts

150

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@EnduranceFun said:

So basically Patrick is writing less news and appearing in more videos, and they're getting a replacement to do the old news job? Correct me if I'm wrong.

Like, that may be the very worst thing I've ever heard, I think? I only ever supported Patrick at all because he facilitated the unwanted news guy role. If he's now full on member of the crew when he's awful at videos and the podcast, that's pretty atrocious. Yep yep, I know plenty of you guys just love how he runs around in circles in quick looks, states incorrect factoids far more than anyone else in videos and talks over everyone else with his inane bullshit, but if they're really giving him even less of a real job then I can see myself unsubscribing, because I don't know if I can take more of his entitled bullshit. That is just my opinion before anyone jumps down my throat.

Patrick is best as a newsman. Dude knows the game. I don't think he's nearly as comfortable or as skilled on the cameras as the original Bomb guys, but Patrick I feel has a great grasp on how to report news and he should continue to do so in light of how GB handles "gaming news" (not really at all). He's necessary in that role to at least add new posts now and again.

Avatar image for colubroid
colubroid

39

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By colubroid

Haven't played any of the Shining games in years, so don't know how they hold up. However, there has been some drama around them recently. http://youtu.be/rQdFcf9SE5s gives a short history of the series and how Sega has gone full crazy on the fan base recently.

Avatar image for bvilleneuve
bvilleneuve

304

Forum Posts

11

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Edited By bvilleneuve

@EnduranceFun said:

So basically Patrick is writing less news and appearing in more videos, and they're paying for a replacement to do the old news job? Correct me if I'm wrong.

I don't know. I might have misunderstood the post, but what I took from it is that they're just outsourcing the transcripts of interviews. The "bringing in outside writers" is just a maybe thing, and definitely not enough for you to draw such a sweeping conclusion from.

Anyway, I really like the niche Patrick has formed for himself here at Giant Bomb. I look forward to the Worth Reading column every week (The Matt Duhamel article about the cycle of desperation linked to online gaming was excellent), and I appreciate his input on the podcast and on Quick Looks. Even if I don't always agree with him about games, he has an interest in keeping his finger on the pulse of independently-developed games, and that's pretty important to me.

Avatar image for spidergoat
Spidergoat

130

Forum Posts

38

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

Edited By Spidergoat

@GrantHeaslip said:

@Pingu44 said:

But you aren't paying for it. This is free content. Your membership doesn't get you access to this any more than mine does. Comparing this to a poorly made game is ludicrous based on the fact that you actually have to pay to play that game. Now, if you want to bitch about a members only video or something, then fine, be my guest. I won't necessarily agree with you but you're entitled to do so.

You're very much comparing apples to oranges. Do you often find yourself bitching about the quality of freely available flash games, or free to play, ad supported Facebook junk, wondering why they aren't as good as <insert big budget game/franchise you like here>? There's key differences here. One costs you money to access. One does not. To complain about something that is both free and optional is as far as I can determine lunacy, and this post (as are all of the news posts, I'm fairly certain) is exactly that.

Now for what it's worth I found no error in the post whatsoever, but what do I know? I never went to 'grade' school, but then I also spell words like 'colour' and 'honour' correctly.

I don't think the Giant Bomb guys would share (or appreciate) the low bar you've set for them. I consider Giant Bomb to be orders of magnitude better than the game website equivalent of FarmVille — if I were coming at this from your mindset, I'd have left a long time ago, because I don't have the time or patience to deal with that kind of shit.

I read New York Times and Toronto Star articles for free as well, but that doesn't mean I don't hold them to a pretty high standard. I simply don't buy your "if it's available for free, you can't complain" argument.

P.S. In all seriousness, I've considered writing American English on American sites, but it would be kind of tough to jump back and forth all the time.

No, I'm sure they wouldn't, but my issue here is that anyone should feel entitled to complain when there are errors. If the staff wish to set a high standard for themselves, it is incumbent on them to enforce it, not for anyone who has no interest in this other than personal. To rather simplify a point I would hope I've already made, no one apart from the staff has any skin in this game. If they fuck up and people don't like it and stop clicking articles, well, that's their problem, and I imagine it's one they would find out about (or know about already) soon enough. I also imagine that if that was an actual problem they were having, these posts wouldn't be going up in such a fashion that is apparently so unconscionable to so many people (albeit unconscionable for reasons that I genuinely can't fathom, or in this case, see). Not to put words in the mouths of the staff here but I daresay they wouldn't particularly miss the people who seem to get up in arms about some informalities anyway, especially when considering the rest of the site's content is hardly designed to be prim and proper at every available opportunity. Bottom line, everyone needs to lighten the fuck up. We're not debating literature or politics or religion here, we're talking about games. We all love them but they're not so important that we need to pick apart grammatical errors in the discussion of them that are frankly unapparent to most.

And as an interesting aside (and yes I know I shouldn't start a sentence with 'and', but as I'm sure you've figured out by now I don't consider good grammar a substitute for eloquence), Chrome tells me 'informalities' is a spelling mistake. I (and dictionary.com) disagree.

Avatar image for dixavd
Dixavd

3013

Forum Posts

245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Dixavd

@insanejedi: This has nothing to do with a shooting. All of these arguments were brought up when the advertising was first brought up. You can criticise anyone from making those arguments about them crossing a line but saying that people only care because of a shooting is absurd - it was talked about for great length when it was first mentioned and people cared then. The recent events have meerly made people out more scrutiny in it and now people are saying "hey guys, remember this - we never resolved before; it is worth discussing again". It isn't that people didn't care before; it is just these are things that people who want toblame video games will latch on to so we have to bring it up again due to recent events.

Don't insult the people bringing up this topic by implying that they only care because of what is in the news. If you have a problem with what they are saying then just say the second half of your comment actually criticising their arguement.

And don't take this as me simply criticising you due to me not liking your opinion - I personally don't know what to think as being in the UK where guns are illegal (well at least to the point where there aren't stores that people can go to and impulse-buy a gun from), it is hard for me to figure out what my opinion would be if that wasn't the case.

Avatar image for cassus
cassus

401

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By cassus

"I chose to define myself by my gaming successes as a way of displacing the definition given to me by my circumstances. This has brought with it all the consequences Deresiewicz describes, but without any of the benefits gained from the hard work real-world success requires."

This is something a lot of us can empathize with. The reason for this is partially explained by how our parents/tv shows/disney/movies decided to spin reality into that whole "you can become anything you want!" cliché (or lie). When you're growing up you see your future as all kinds of amazing -- ANYTHING I WANT! WOHOO! Then you hit your mid 20s and sorta go "well.. that didn't go the way I was led to believe.." and you start trying to find a sense of worth elsewhere. If you were already into gaming then hey, you'll continue that, most likely. If not.. Then you have a lot of different options.. Drugs, become a playa if you have the looks for it, being a super needy social sponge.. I guess that's what they meant when they said you can be anything you want, they just decided not to tell you the full story. You can be anything you want as long as you don't want anything fancy.

I suspect a lot of people who didn't end up where they wanted to end up know what I'm talking about. If you feel like delving deeper into the whys of our generation, dig up some info about Generation Me. There are some resources out there that outline why our generation ended up being self obsessed needy twats whose misery is a direct result of lies we were told and lies we chose to hang on to for comfort.

Best regards - A slightly (quite) bitter dude whose time is mostly spent living vicariously through games/movies/tv shows/music/etc and pondering where it all went to shit.

Avatar image for dijon
Itwastuesday

1269

Forum Posts

38

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Itwastuesday

@Dixavd: I was commenting (poorly, with low effort) more at dumb friends on Facebook who often link to TED talks about schooling and are like "YYYYeeh eff schools, man!" *continues working retail/fastfood with few hopes of ever getting out* I said that the guy in the video was an intellectual, because that's how I regard the kinds of critical thinkers that TED frequently has give TED talks. It's just a word I use to describe people in shorthand so that other people understand who I'm talking about, I don't mean to try to single out THESE DAMN DEVIL LIBERAL INTELLECTUALS (not that I think you were implying that about me).

Avatar image for dallas_raines
Dallas_Raines

2269

Forum Posts

45

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Dallas_Raines

Ignoring users ala GameFAQs would be the best feature you could add to the site.

Avatar image for andyace83
AndyAce83

137

Forum Posts

17

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 2

Edited By AndyAce83

"You've probably seen it already, but read this excellent essay criticizing The Big Bang Theory." That was NOT an excellent essay. People really need to get a brain. All comedy is based on flaws. To critizise a show that is suppose to be funny because they make fun of the characters is dumb, dumb, dumb. And then also rant that it makes to much cultural reference (meaning NOT MAKE FUN of characters).

Jeez!

Avatar image for dixavd
Dixavd

3013

Forum Posts

245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Dixavd

@Itwastuesday: Oh, sorry. I read it as you were saying that they shouldn't have these discussions because of how some people repond to it (not as you criticising those who respond badly to it).

Avatar image for spidergoat
Spidergoat

130

Forum Posts

38

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

Edited By Spidergoat

@GrantHeaslip said:

@Pingu44 said:

No, I'm sure they wouldn't, but my issue here is that anyone should feel entitled to complain when there are errors. If the staff wish to set a high standard for themselves, it is incumbent on them to enforce it, not for anyone who has no interest in this other than personal. To rather simplify a point I would hope I've already made, no one apart from the staff has any skin in this game. If they fuck up and people don't like it and stop clicking articles, well, that's their problem, and I imagine it's one they would find out about (or know about already) soon enough. I also imagine that if that was an actual problem they were having, these posts wouldn't be going up in such a fashion that is apparently so unconscionable to so many people (albeit unconscionable for reasons that I genuinely can't fathom, or in this case, see). Not to put words in the mouths of the staff here but I daresay they wouldn't particularly miss the people who seem to get up in arms about some informalities anyway, especially when considering the rest of the site's content is hardly designed to be prim and proper at every available opportunity. Bottom line, everyone needs to lighten the fuck up. We're not debating literature or politics or religion here, we're talking about games. We all love them but they're not so important that we need to pick apart grammatical errors in the discussion of them that are frankly unapparent to most.

I think "unconscionable" is perhaps a stronger wording than what I feel. More than anything, it's baffling — I don't get why he continues to make mistakes that could so easily be rectified.

I get what you're saying, but again, I don't buy your premise. Market economics, in certain contexts, work on a macro level, but I don't think their success rides on Patrick's ability to proofread. In that sense, you're right, it doesn't matter — he could probably write all of their articles with the syntax of a middle-school AIM conversation without substantially impacting their ad impressions (I imagine the videos and reviews are the big traffic drivers).

The standard I'm holding Patrick to isn't about Giant Bomb's material success, it's about respect for his readers and pride in his work. They might not miss me and the other nitpickers, but I think our existence should be seen as a good sign — that there are people who care enough and expect enough to bother.

My apologies if that word is not indicative of your feeling but I wasn't only referring to you, but, while there are plenty of people for whom that term would be apt I shouldn't have generalised.

Ignoring money altogether (as that wasn't the reasoning behind my statement, although I certainly can see how it could be construed as such), Jeff has set out his stall and said on many occasions that games are fun and so should reporting and coverage. It may well be that these minor, miniscule errors (and they are exactly that - they aren't factual errors, they're not even spelling mistakes, they're grammatical in nature and infinitesimally noticeable in stature) are not ones that the staff are concerned by, since this particular edict practically begs for informality. Would it have noticeably improved the article and therefore the site to change some small aspect that exceptionally few people would notice and and an even smaller number would care about? I doubt it highly.

The 'pride in his work' notion is misguided as well in my opinion. Do you know that he takes no pride in his work? Last time I checked he was human and capable of making mistakes, as are the people who would have proof read this and as are the people who have claimed there are mistakes that, frankly, I'm still yet to see. I genuinely see no errors in this, but please, feel free to correct me. I'm sure I'll still not find them nearly as egregious as some apparently do. I think if he had no respect for his readers he wouldn't write for a living, or at the very least he would find it hard to be gainfully employed to do so. What has bothered me about this is that the criticism hasn't been constructive, it's been vague and empty threats. If you genuinely feel there is an error, tell the man. Spitting vitriol (which I'm not accusing you of, but is present here) serves no purpose, especially when that vitriol is over something so unbelievably insignificant yet bears repeating: we are talking about the grammar in what is basically a blog post on a video game site that is known for not taking itself seriously. It's hardly peace in the Middle East we're debating here, is it?

Avatar image for cooljammer00
cooljammer00

3187

Forum Posts

17

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By cooljammer00

Ctrl+F "Jurassic Life"

How could you, Patrick?!

Avatar image for pat
Pat

114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

Edited By Pat

Keep it real, Scoops! Love what you bring to the site.

Avatar image for hughesman
hughesman

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By hughesman

@AndyAce83 said:

"You've probably seen it already, but read this excellent essay criticizing The Big Bang Theory." That was NOT an excellent essay. People really need to get a brain. All comedy is based on flaws. To critizise a show that is suppose to be funny because they make fun of the characters is dumb, dumb, dumb. And then also rant that it makes to much cultural reference (meaning NOT MAKE FUN of characters).

Jeez!

Yup, exactly. I got about halfway through that article before i couldn't stand it anymore and started skipping paragraphs. Why shouldn't it be ok to laugh at geeks? Or jocks, or rednecks or whatever. It's like this guy thinks he is an ambassador to the normals for the geeklings. THEY ARE LAUGHING AT US ITS JUST LIKE HIGH SCHOOL ALL OVER AGAIN!!!!

Dude, chill it's cool. You ought to be able to laugh at the stereotypes because they are caricatures based on kernels of truth. Probably written by people who can very much relate to the thing they are riffing on.

Avatar image for darkcargio
darkcargio

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By darkcargio

Thank you Patrick the TED video was very inspiring.

Avatar image for satelliteoflove
SatelliteOfLove

1379

Forum Posts

2315

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

Edited By SatelliteOfLove

Gavin Purcell likely speaks for many of us when he talks his guilt from playing with the popular iOS word game Letterpress in 2012. I went through a similar psychological arc years ago when Words With Friends, and it surfaced some of my worst tendencies. It’s awfully easy to start a game with someone, but I’d usually never make it past the second turn. Then, you’re trying to avoid the messages from people asking you to keep playing, and you resent the game, the concept of push notifications, and, ultimately, your friends. Terrible! I don’t blame people for giving up.

That is because Playing in Parallel is not Multiplayer.

Avatar image for silver-streak
Silver-Streak

2030

Forum Posts

587

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 4

Edited By Silver-Streak

Shining Force is pretty great, yes. Shining Force 2 is also pretty great, and if memory serves, may be slightly easier to get into.

Avatar image for devoureroftime
DevourerOfTime

771

Forum Posts

7079

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 65

Edited By DevourerOfTime

The genesis Shining Force games are great, Patrick. The translations don't hold up very well and the storylines aren't that deep, but the games are still mechanically sound. Not as cutthroat as X-Com is, as there is no permadeath, but they are still fairly challenging.

They are actually very similar to Fire Emblem. Maybe you should check out the new FE as well when it comes out next month?

Avatar image for andyace83
AndyAce83

137

Forum Posts

17

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 2

Edited By AndyAce83

@hughesman: Yes. But also I think its important to note that the Big Bang Theory is not hateful either. Its not making cruel fun of nerds, but making jokes at character flaws mixed with sympathetic sides. I dont think that show makes fun of nerds, more than the Simpsons makes fun of males or women or children or scottish people. To make a show funny one needs character flaws. That is what comedy is all about.

But the show is not just about the jokes. Like the show Friends, people keep watching cuz they like the characters. This guy is way of into Whiney-Town, Population: FU!

Avatar image for satelliteoflove
SatelliteOfLove

1379

Forum Posts

2315

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

Edited By SatelliteOfLove

@Morrowind & Agency:

Nobody told me that I was special. No one held my hand. There was no mystic prophecy about how I would be the one to save the world. Not yet.

This is one of the reasons I have problems with alot of recent RPGs. They try and "fluff" me too much. It's like "I'm already great and the forthcoming game is just grind towards the inevitable." Even back in the day, the prophecied hero was more along the lines of "the best we got right now" versus a guarantee.

The Player Character Nepotism needs to be curtailed a good bit.

@DevourerOfTime said:

The genesis Shining Force games are great, Patrick. The translations don't hold up very well and the storylines aren't that deep, but the games are still mechanically sound. Not as cutthroat as X-Com is, as there is no permadeath, but they are still fairly challenging.

They are actually very similar to Fire Emblem. Maybe you should check out the new FE as well when it comes out next month?

The art and music are also top notch.

Avatar image for ripelivejam
ripelivejam

13572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ripelivejam

@EnduranceFun said:

So basically Patrick is writing less news and appearing in more videos, and they're paying for a replacement to do the old news job? Correct me if I'm wrong.

Like, that may be the very worst thing I've ever heard, I think? I only ever supported Patrick at all because he facilitated the unwanted news guy role. If he's now full on 'member of the crew' a la Ryan when he's awful at videos and the podcast, that's pretty atrocious. I know plenty of you guys just love how he runs around in circles in quick looks, states incorrect factoids far more than anyone else in videos and talks over everyone else with his inane blabber... but if they're really giving him even less of a real job then I can see myself unsubscribing, as I don't know if I can take more of his entitled bullshit. I'll wait and see but this really cuts the mustard.

Also still waiting on a reply to the 3,200 baited comments, Klepek.

@Xeirus said:

It always cracks me up when people do this, who cares...

Who cares if the editor knows how to write English. Not like that's a requirement for being a journalist, pshaw.

i think every post of yours i've seen is just following patrick around complaining about him.

you have a blog functionality: put together your own Worth Reading type article and be the improvement you want to see. otherwise stop complaining and stop reading patrick's articles; it's not constructive in the slightest.

Avatar image for insanejedi
insanejedi

781

Forum Posts

777

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

Edited By insanejedi

@Dixavd said:

@insanejedi: This has nothing to do with a shooting. All of these arguments were brought up when the advertising was first brought up. You can criticise anyone from making those arguments about them crossing a line but saying that people only care because of a shooting is absurd - it was talked about for great length when it was first mentioned and people cared then. The recent events have meerly made people out more scrutiny in it and now people are saying "hey guys, remember this - we never resolved before; it is worth discussing again". It isn't that people didn't care before; it is just these are things that people who want toblame video games will latch on to so we have to bring it up again due to recent events.

Don't insult the people bringing up this topic by implying that they only care because of what is in the news. If you have a problem with what they are saying then just say the second half of your comment actually criticising their arguement.

And don't take this as me simply criticising you due to me not liking your opinion - I personally don't know what to think as being in the UK where guns are illegal (well at least to the point where there aren't stores that people can go to and impulse-buy a gun from), it is hard for me to figure out what my opinion would be if that wasn't the case.

Above apparently did not read...

"OH BUT SANDY HOOK SHOOTING. IT'S SO DISRESPECTFUL!"

And a week before that it wasn't? What's so wrong with it right now that it was okay a month ago? It's such a childish notion to censor stuff because of recent events, but it's okay after a several months or a year after it has happened.

If you are also one of those people who think that crossing the threshold between real life guns and video games, then I suppose we shouldn't have name brand guns in video games as well because THAT'S crossing the line between real life and video games.

And someone apparently did not open the link which was an article that attacked EA for promoting an M rated game with real life firearm and edged tool advertising in light of the shooting.

There is no further opinion which Patrick gave other than EA was being indecent and linked to this article. There are two most likely things That Patrick believes in by bringing up that article.

A: That EA shouldn't be crossing the line between real life and games

B: That EA shouldn't be crossing this line in light of the recent shootings

Both of which I conclude are childish notions and morally inconsistent, when we have games with real life weapons, and we have games that fictionalize important historical events where many people tragically die.

Avatar image for bigbootyhoe
BigBootyHoe

7

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By BigBootyHoe

Ohhh god nooooo! Stick to news please please please. You are very good at news and very bad at everything else. You state completely incorrect things as fact and suck the funny out of the room faster than an AIDS diagnosis. PLEASE just stick to news.

Avatar image for nidzumi
nidzumi

117

Forum Posts

50

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By nidzumi

@hughesman: I think it's more because they laugh directly at the audience they appear to be targeting. I can see both points of view even though I don't care for that show.

Avatar image for karkarov
Karkarov

3385

Forum Posts

3096

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Karkarov

Hmm wonder why that same dude wrote basically the same story for two different places? Duhamel also has basically the same article posted to Kotaku. Of course Patrick did link the superior article since that one (while being basically the same) comes sans Kotaku users and their inane moronic comments.

Avatar image for endurancefun
EnduranceFun

1116

Forum Posts

223

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By EnduranceFun

@ripelivejam said:

i think every post of yours i've seen is just following patrick around complaining about him.

you have a blog functionality: put together your own Worth Reading type article and be the improvement you want to see. otherwise stop complaining and stop reading patrick's articles; it's not constructive in the slightest.

I'm not complaining about the Worth Reading. Try reading my post instead of grouping them up with the other 'bashing my idol' comments you never try to understand.

Avatar image for mjhealy
MjHealy

2009

Forum Posts

17432

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 15

Edited By MjHealy

Oh Patrick you linked to that "mid-core" article on Gamasutra, didn't you? I could not roll my eyes any harder at that piece. I think I hate "mid-core" more than Triple A, which believe me says a whole lot.

Avatar image for ripelivejam
ripelivejam

13572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ripelivejam

@EnduranceFun said:

@ripelivejam said:

i think every post of yours i've seen is just following patrick around complaining about him.

you have a blog functionality: put together your own Worth Reading type article and be the improvement you want to see. otherwise stop complaining and stop reading patrick's articles; it's not constructive in the slightest.

I'm not complaining about the Worth Reading. Try reading my post instead of grouping them up with the other 'bashing my idol' comments you never try to understand.

well everything you said in your post was a negative jibe at patrick, so it was hard to construe you had no problem with the worth reading articles (which i'm pretty sure is bullshit too). worth reading articles aren't entirely news anyway, more videogame/human interest pieces and editorial, mixed with blog, so i don't understand how that gets a pass from you if what you're desiring from patrick is news only. scratch that, i believe you just want to have him sequestered to one place so he's easier to avoid and not offend your delicate sensibilities. i think you and others are also overestimating patrick's role as the only news guy; he's one guy, he's not going to be able to report on everything. if you don't think he's doing a good job then be fucking constructive about it, and don't harp on it and obsess over every single little flaw like it's physically harming you or something. maybe try to add some praise on what you like. that's called feedback. you call him out, berate him, and fling petty insults his way all the time. if you have nothing nice to say, don't say anything at all? or maybe more to the point: better to remain silent and be thought a fool than speak out and remove all doubt. go ahead and unsubscribe as you're adding nothing of benefit to this site as far as i can see besides petty, childish complaints.

Avatar image for dixavd
Dixavd

3013

Forum Posts

245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Dixavd

@insanejedi said:

Above apparently did not read...

"OH BUT SANDY HOOK SHOOTING. IT'S SO DISRESPECTFUL!"

And a week before that it wasn't? What's so wrong with it right now that it was okay a month ago? It's such a childish notion to censor stuff because of recent events, but it's okay after a several months or a year after it has happened.

If you are also one of those people who think that crossing the threshold between real life guns and video games, then I suppose we shouldn't have name brand guns in video games as well because THAT'S crossing the line between real life and video games.

And someone apparently did not open the link which was an article that attacked EA for promoting an M rated game with real life firearm and edged tool advertising in light of the shooting.

There is no further opinion which Patrick gave other than EA was being indecent and linked to this article. There are two most likely things That Patrick believes in by bringing up that article.

A: That EA shouldn't be crossing the line between real life and games

B: That EA shouldn't be crossing this line in light of the recent shootings

Both of which I conclude are childish notions and morally inconsistent, when we have games with real life weapons, and we have games that fictionalize important historical events where many people tragically die.

Above apparently did not read...

@Dixavd said:

@insanejedi: This has nothing to do with a shooting. All of these arguments were brought up when the advertising was first brought up. You can criticise anyone from making those arguments about them crossing a line but saying that people only care because of a shooting is absurd - it was talked about for great length when it was first mentioned and people cared then. The recent events have meerly made people out more scrutiny in it and now people are saying "hey guys, remember this - we never resolved before; it is worth discussing again". It isn't that people didn't care before; it is just these are things that people who want toblame video games will latch on to so we have to bring it up again due to recent events.

Don't insult the people bringing up this topic by implying that they only care because of what is in the news. If you have a problem with what they are saying then just say the second half of your comment actually criticising their arguement.

And don't take this as me simply criticising you due to me not liking your opinion - I personally don't know what to think as being in the UK where guns are illegal (well at least to the point where there aren't stores that people can go to and impulse-buy a gun from), it is hard for me to figure out what my opinion would be if that wasn't the case.

... Where I clearly stated that the second half of your comment, where you said you disagreed with the sentiment that it is immoral for a company to blur the line between fictional weaponry and real life weaponry, was a totally valid arguement but it is the only valid arguement you have. I clearly told you that this topic was brought up before and cared about before the shooting and that it is being brought up now after the shooting not because people suddenly care but because it needs to be discussed and people trying to blame all of this on videogames will bring it up anyway (so it must be tackled and mentioned no matter what anyones individual opinion of it was.

Avatar image for endurancefun
EnduranceFun

1116

Forum Posts

223

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By EnduranceFun

@ripelivejam said:

snip

No, I did not criticise Worth Reading, so while you may say I make a fool of myself it is you who does by repeatedly making false accusations. If you actually read the first post [can you read?] you'd see that I did praise Patrick for doing the annoying job of being the news editor. Yes, I don't like Patrick in videos or the podcast and would rather have him do the news as that's supposed to be his expertise, I don't see why this is offensive enough for you to tell me to leave the site in a wall of, consistently self-indulgent and masturbatory, text.

Avatar image for bybeach
bybeach

6754

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By bybeach

I am honestly loooking foward to your PC build. I personallly went way too far. I admit it. I still am questioning some of the advice I got was completely sincere. But boy does it perform.

Thereis that happy space, where you can play on high settings the games of today, and easily upgrade tomorrrow. It starts with your PSU.....

Avatar image for envane
envane

1289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By envane

you dont fuck with dark dragon

Avatar image for akumaxxx
AkumaXxX

16

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By AkumaXxX

Awesome post! The projects on Kickstarter look good..

Avatar image for truthtellah
TruthTellah

9827

Forum Posts

423

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By TruthTellah

Wait, the developers of The Ship wanted funding to make another one?

Why did I never hear about this? Did... anyone here about this?

I would have contributed if I thought they were actually doing a Kickstarter to make another.