PS3 version frame-rate drops in cities?

#1 Posted by KillerClaw (64 posts) -

Has anyone else experienced some notable frame-rate drops in major cities (ex. Boston) when running around? (on the PS3 version at least). It is getting to the point where the game is more frustrating to play more than anything and I'm feeling like I've wasted my 60$.

#2 Posted by Blommer4 (191 posts) -

Yup, that's the reason I've only played 2 hours in this whole week...

#3 Posted by hollitz (1398 posts) -

The PS3 version of the AC games tend to have the most technical hiccups, so I get them on 360 despite the extra PS3 content.

#4 Posted by adam1808 (1359 posts) -

I think the framerate drops are just there regardless of platform. It's a rough version on PS3 and 360.

#5 Posted by mordukai (7129 posts) -

Considering the amount of objects and people the game has to render; I think you need to say thanks the game runs on consoles at all.

#6 Posted by ikwal (225 posts) -

Yeah the frame rate is really bad. I'm starting to regret that I didn't have patience to wait for the PC version, because it's almost unplayable in the cities.

#7 Posted by KillerClaw (64 posts) -

@mordukai said:

Considering the amount of objects and people the game has to render; I think you need to say thanks the game runs on consoles at all.

I'd personally trade complex graphics for smoother game-play. Honestly a dishonored style of textures would work perfectly fine.

#8 Posted by Wuddel (2078 posts) -

It has been rough at times, but still better than AC:Rev.

#9 Posted by NekuSakuraba (7240 posts) -

The general consensus seems to be that the PS3 version is choppy. That's why I'm holding out for the PC version when I eventually get the game.

#10 Posted by probablytuna (3525 posts) -

I haven't noticed significant drops in frame rate other than a few cutscenes. I've gotten used to playing on less than optimal FPS in the previous Assassin's Creed games anyway so I don't mind it.

#11 Posted by moffattron9000 (351 posts) -

Technical errors are are admittedly worse on the PS3, but the 360 version have their fair share of issues as well (my personal favorite was when a deer got stuck in a tree). Realistically technical issues of this kind are going to be par for the course in any open world game as the amount of variations that can happen are far too high in number to be without some hiccups.

#12 Posted by Sooty (8082 posts) -

It can't be worse than the first game on PS3, good god that was really bad.

#13 Posted by Ujio (565 posts) -

I haven't noticed anything. Maybe I just can't "see it" like everyone else, apparently. But I'm not having any trouble running around Boston at all.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.