@Video_Game_King said:
But just because a game doesn't do that does not make it bad; it simply makes it just as good as the game before it. And what if I hadn't played either of those games? How would you be able to tell me that Assassin's Creed III is a bad game based on its similarities to previous games? Your argument would make no sense.
It's not the mechanics people are buying Revelations for, it's the story. I skipped Revelations after hearing it's quite thin on the meaningful story side. Games should evolve; it makes perfect sense why people would be bored of Revelations. Assassins Creed 1 was new interesting but slightly broken, Assassin's Creed 2 improved on the story; gameplay and visuals, Brotherhood was a smaller step but still significant It included a more fluid combat system and assassin friends while adding to the story. Revelations from what i've seen/heard failed to evolve the formula and add enough to the story. And having a 1 year break in between each game did them no favours in keeping it fresh. I do have high hopes for 3 though, because of it being about Desmond the setting will force gameplay differences.
Log in to comment