No, I don't still enjoy them. I have enjoyed much of the series in the past, but I really don't like where they're taking it. I didn't play the first one, but I loved II,III, and IV for different reasons. II is the best game overall, IV was the most polished and fun, and I am one of apparently very few who really appreciated III for making some bold choices to tell a darker story with a protagonist who was jaded instead of charismatic. (It should be noted that I played III post-patches when it wasn't as buggy as I've heard it was initially.) I'll defend basically everything about that game except for the really annoying switcheroo they pulled early on. The Frontier area is still one of my favorites in the series overall.
I'm a sucker for cool environments and some nods to history, though. Which, for me, makes the setting fairly key. Italy is of course amazing, New England circa Revolution is fantastic American history, and the Caribbean is pretty alluring in general. I felt like all those worlds were interesting and were realized well, which helped me overlook some flaws a bit. Which brings us to the past few games. Setting-wise, Rogue and Chronicles are the two that have intrigued me, but both games were actively relegated to second or third-tier in the franchise. It was hard to get too amped for either, given that one released exclusively on an older console and the other is limited as a side-scroller. I may give Rogue a shot at some point, though. It seemed to be 100% decent and had a more interesting premise than usual. That Chronicles is apparently as close as we'll get to an Asian setting in an Assassin's Creed game is extremely disappointing.
With Unity, there was some real potential. However, I was out the second they revealed another generic male protagonist. I don't usually get in a tizzy about that stuff, but women played such a huge role in the French Revolution that it was a complete disservice to not make the protagonist female. Spare me the "but, but, Liberation" crap. Vita third-tier shit doesn't count. Ubi, since this was a main release in the series, chose to pander to market research suggesting a white male might sell more copies rather than a character more befitting the era, and that's bullshit. It was essentially actively ignoring a big part of that history out of greed. I mean, how cool would it have been to play as some badass woman taking on oppression by cutting people apart in hyperviolent fashion? Huge missed opportunity there. They deservedly took some heat for it, and then the game released as a buggy piece of shit. For me, Unity was a huge blow for the franchise. I hadn't given up on the AC series yet, though. I was ready to forgive this disastrous dud in hopes the next entry would be interesting
Then they announce it's set in Victorian England. Now, I know there's people into that setting, and that's fine, but I think it has been really overdone of late in games, TV, film, etc. This probably wouldn't bother me so much, except Ubi is completely uppity in their refusal to do a feudal Japan/China/Mongolia AC game (which could be fucking amazing) because they think it's played out. Fucking hypocrites. On top of that, yet again we have a white male protagonist getting top billing in every possible respect. Apparently there will be an option to play as a female character, but it seems 100% like an afterthought tossed in simply as an appeasement after the Unity fiasco. You wouldn't even know it's an option from the trailer or released gameplay footage, either. It's like they're trying to do the bare minimum just to say they did while trying their best to hide it from the general public, and that's all kinds of fucked up.
Moreover, Unity and Syndicate don't appear to be evolving the series much at all. They're arguably taking steps backwards. I mean, II at least had some varied Italian cities and locations, III had multiple cities and the Frontier, IV had the naval warfare component and different islands, and Unity and Syndicate are back to just one city. Paris and London are obviously iconic places with rich history, but the exploration aspect is inherently a bit limited there unless you're super into those cities. I don't want to take away from the environments because that part of the AC games (even the bad ones) tends to be masterful, but that just isn't able to continue masking the ever-growing list of flaws. The gameplay doesn't seem to have changed much, either. The latest iterations appear little more than re-skins of late, and that's truly a shame.
The AC series is just a cash grab at this point. I'm usually the guy defending companies for profit-seeking so they can continue to make games, but Ubi has gone off the deep end. The show over there is clearly run by suits who sit there vetoing creativity if it might mean larger profit. This is acceptable to a point, but Ubi flew by that long ago. Now it's formulaic garbage based entirely on what awful market research tells them will sell the most, replete with gross apparel, attempts to incentivize pre-ordering, and what's surely soon-to-be DLC content that's probably already done and is simply being withheld from the main game to be sold for more later. Let's not forget flooding the market with multiple games in the series to try to whore out the license as much as possible. Oh, plus review embargoes to try and move launch copies before the verdicts are in. Making good AC games is a secondary goal at best for Ubi these days, so I'm out until that changes...if it ever does.
Log in to comment