Haven't even touched an Assassins Creed game since 2, and i don't plan to until 3 comes out.
Hope i didn't miss anything too major
You missed Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood, the best game in the franchise.Haven't even touched an Assassins Creed game since 2, and i don't plan to until 3 comes out.
Hope i didn't miss anything too major
@Voxel said:
@thebunnyhunterYou missed Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood, the best game in the franchise.Haven't even touched an Assassins Creed game since 2, and i don't plan to until 3 comes out.
Hope i didn't miss anything too major
Not only when referring to gameplay, but overall, you've missed out on some important story stuff.
I've only played the first two, so yes, Im going to play brotherhood and revelations first.
I recently went through the all of the ACII Trilogy. It was hard enough getting through these games the first time around. They are cool on paper... bun fun playing them? Not so much. At least for me.
The entirety of Assassin's Creed is too plodding for me. And it pretty much plays itself.
Hell - AC3 looks cool, but yet again seems like more of an autopilot game to me. For example the bow. Fun bow gameplay involves pulling the sinew just right. To aim and lead just right. To anticipate drop. To friggin' shoot the damn thing myself. But no... it's yet another autopilot tool. So no thanks, maybe for a buck fiddy a couple of years down the road, and even then only due to a false sense of dilligence.
Why anybody would get so excited, to waste so much time on playing the previous Assassin's Creed games again, when there are so many other good games coming out all the time? Oh wasteful heart of the youth, how I can no longer afford thee. Or is it just that youth can't afford more games?
I tend to play through previous titles in a series before playing a new installment (Metal Gear, Legacy of Kain, Halo), so I'll probably do it here. But because of the expansiveness of the games, I'll probably limit myself to just the central story and suppress my completionist tendencies.
I got my xbox in 2009....so I've literally played through the whole 4 games in 3 years....I'll know what's up come this (november?).
So excited!!
No, I think the gameplay between them is similar enough, that it might drain some of my enjoyment from III, as for the story itself I can remember that pretty well.
No no, I've had enough of AC2 tech. Waiting for the AC3 innovation!
I love the series, but there is simply not enough time. Anyone who hasn't played Brotherhood should do that ASAP.
Revelations less so, but it's more important story-wise than Ryan Davis would have you believe. Even if the ending isn't as "crazy random" when compared to Assassins Creed II.
@Grimace said:
Revelations less so, but it's more important story-wise than Ryan Davis would have you believe. Even if the ending isn't as "crazy random" when compared to Assassins Creed II.
Yes, this is very much true. I think it'd be a huge mistake to pass on AC:R.
@Canteu: I hope most people don't think the game will be as you just put it, because Assassin's Creed 3 will be different. Go look at videos, it'll have small additions that I believe will end up making the experience feel fresh. It's not just your new iteration of the last AC game you played.
i bought AC:II and didn't play it too much. dunno why i didn't i just did not play it that much.
I've played through them all already and I do not intend on playing them again.
Anyway, due to how bad I am at finishing a single game at once, there is no way in hell I could replay all of the previous ones to get ready for the next one. I might get the Desmond/Subject 16 DLC for Revelations (As I sort of liked those Puzzle segments) and I should watch the Embers animated video/film that I haven't seen even though it came with my Revelations pre-order (I honestly only ordered that version for the soundtrack) which should easily be enough for me to get ready for AC III.
I was burnt out on AC by AC2, I doubt I'll ever get around to playing AC3, yet alone replaying the past games.
i wasn't going to, but i picked up AC:B off steam last week for £5. just reminded me how fucking great the AC games are and has got me really hyped for 3. the PC version of 3 isn't out till the end of nov so gives me plenty of time to catch up.
wow, I'm really surprised by this perception of AC. Sure, Brotherhood and Revelations were more of AC2, but AC2 is a great game (especially compared to the first game) and AC3 looks incredible. They have totally reworked most, if not all of the systems in the game for 3 including the combat, the navigation and the stealth, if what they have been showing off in videos is to be believed then they all look good changes and the conclusion to this arc of the AC story as a whole should be interesting.
No. I played Brotherhood and Revelations back-to-back and it left me incredibly burned out by the middle of Revelations. I want my ACIII experience as exhilarating as ACII was, which I still consider to be one of the best games of the generation.
I only played AC2 and it was enjoyed. Was looking forward to future releases but they just seemed to similar to bother with.
AC3 looks like it will be fun but probably story limited with lots of DLC and pumping out more yearly sequels after that. Really puts me off wanting to go back to it.
Assassin's Creed is one of those series' that is really difficult to playthrough back-to-back-to-back-to-back....because from AC II, Brotherhood, and Revelations iterate so much that at some point, it'll feel like you're playing the longest game in history. Especially if you're doing all the sidequests, and collectibles or anything non-story related.
I did finally wrap up Revelations last week before AC III's release, though.
I still haven't finished AC1 even if I own all the other ones too. It's just too damn BORING, and I'm a person who dislikes to watch the end on YouTube. It feels wrong somehow... *sigh* Someday I will embark upon this most holy of quests and complete the damn games.
I did pick up AC3 - Liberation for the Vita though, since that's a bit more stand-alone and it has been a blast so far! Is the other AC games like that? (i.e the ones that came after the first one, and regarding repetitiveness)
The Quick Look of the third one looked pretty cool and the combat looked pretty fun so I may play it. Actually, the combat kind of reminded me of The Patriot. Mel Gibson axes people like nobody's business in that movie.
However, out of all of the AC games I've played 2 for about three or four hours, maybe a bit more, and none of the others. I know the twist at the end of 2 and a bit of the Desmond stuff but that's all I know about the series. Judging by my past track record, I could never get through all of the games before the end of this year unless they really, really clicked well with me and 2 didn't draw me in as well as something like Dead Space or Skyrim or Halo. Chances are, I'd play one of the previous games (probably 2 or Brotherhood) and then dive into 3, and maybe play some of the other ones later. All of them, in order, in a short span of time? That isn't going to happen.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment