Would You Pay for Dark Knight Rises Story DLC for Arkham City?

Avatar image for realph
#1 Edited by realph (317 posts) -
No Caption Provided

So, I just thought of this and I feel Rocksteady might have missed a trick here. Why not capitalise on the release of The Dark Knight Rises next week, with themed The Dark Knight Rises Story DLC for Arkham City? I'm sure it's a lot harder than just that, seeing as TDKR I believe takes place all over Gotham, but I feel it would be worth the effort have sold quite well on the back of the movie and on the back of Rocksteady's reputation with the Batman games. Maybe they could have made it standalone DLC, one that doesn't require a copy of Arkham City. I kind of feel something like this would have sold gangbusters. What do you think?

Avatar image for flyinnmunkee
#2 Posted by Flyinnmunkee (32 posts) -

I'd buy it, as long as they got the actual actors to do voice.

Avatar image for klei
#3 Edited by Klei (1798 posts) -

No, i'm not really a fan of the films, especially not Christian Bale as Bruce. They're far from bad, but when you can't recognize the main character even with two films, it's hard to dive in totally. I don't like the suit either. Something's wrong with the mask.

Avatar image for mesoian
#4 Posted by mesoian (1621 posts) -

I'd rather have a red hood campaign, but sure.

As long as it's written well.

Avatar image for phatmac
#5 Posted by Phatmac (5930 posts) -

Nah, the games have done a great job of being strong without the movie's infulence. I'd also rather see Rocksteady's talent go into something else.

Avatar image for realph
#6 Posted by realph (317 posts) -

@Flyinnmunkee: I'm sure some movie tie-ins have managed to land the original voice actors. Depends on the budget I guess.

Avatar image for aelric
#7 Posted by Aelric (436 posts) -

If Rocksteady made a specific separate game based on that, sure. I don't think what you want would really be 'DLC' territory.

Avatar image for daneian
#8 Posted by Daneian (1308 posts) -

Only if Jonathan Nolan got to write it.

Avatar image for project343
#9 Posted by project343 (2895 posts) -

Tonally, the films and the games are drastically different. I feel like doing the crossover would end up with some sort of identity-confused Frankenstein of a thing.

Avatar image for clonedzero
#10 Posted by Clonedzero (4206 posts) -

nah, not really.

the batman i wanna watch, and the batman i wanna play as, are two different things.

Avatar image for yummylee
#11 Posted by Yummylee (24646 posts) -

@Mesoian said:

I'd rather have a red hood campaign, but sure.

As long as it's written well.

Complete with a John DiMaggio'd Joker!

Avatar image for little_socrates
#12 Posted by Little_Socrates (5844 posts) -

Knightfall would not make for a fun Rocksteady game, and I would definitely not want to see a straight film adaptation. I'd much rather see them take on The Dark Knight Returns or The Long Halloween, though the latter is certainly out of fandom for the book.

Avatar image for mariachimacabre
#13 Posted by MariachiMacabre (7097 posts) -
@Little_Socrates

Knightfall would not make for a fun Rocksteady game, and I would definitely not want to see a straight film adaptation. I'd much rather see them take on The Dark Knight Returns or The Long Halloween, though the latter is certainly out of fandom for the book.

I agree with this. Knightfall wouldn't be fun.
Avatar image for zaccheus
#14 Posted by Zaccheus (1934 posts) -

The Rocksteady Batman and the Nolan Batman are two different characters.

Avatar image for mildmolasses
#15 Posted by MildMolasses (3200 posts) -

I'd rather not have Nolan's awful vision of the Batman universe infect what is otherwise a pitch perfect version of it

Avatar image for kindgineer
#16 Posted by kindgineer (3059 posts) -

Not really, I just never thought that the movies really justified a gaming release. There isn't enough freedom to make alternate side-stories like Arkham City and Asylum. Not to mention, no offence intended, but I never enjoyed the Dark Knight's version of the Joker. He just didn't lean enough into the insanity for me, but maybe I am just a Mark Hamill Joker fanboy.

Avatar image for daiphyer
#17 Posted by Daiphyer (1470 posts) -

No? No. No!

Yeah, no.

Avatar image for realph
#18 Posted by realph (317 posts) -
Loading Video...

So, this happened.

Avatar image for xyzygy
#19 Posted by xyzygy (10595 posts) -

Nah, I'd rather keep them separate. The rumours of a silver age Batman Rocksteady game are too good to be true - they could really have a lot of fun with that project.

Avatar image for gunstarred
#20 Posted by GunstarRed (6044 posts) -

Oh god no! I'd rather have a movie based on the game.

Avatar image for gamer_152
#21 Posted by Gamer_152 (14474 posts) -

No. I love the Arkham games, I love Nolan's Batman, but they're two separate and distinct things, and to see Warner Bros. try to mash the two universes into one big blob just to make some quick cash would be upsetting.

Moderator
Avatar image for oldguy
#22 Posted by OldGuy (1666 posts) -

@GunstarRed said:

Oh god no! I'd rather have a movie based on the game.

...or an entireseries on which the game wasbased... :-)

Avatar image for mariachimacabre
#23 Posted by MariachiMacabre (7097 posts) -

@Gamer_152 said:

No. I love the Arkham games, I love Nolan's Batman, but they're two separate and distinct things, and to see Warner Bros. try to mash the two universes into one big blob just to make some quick cash would be upsetting.

Especially considering Bane and Catwoman are in AC and their characters are completely different from Nolan's versions.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.