attackosaur's Batman: Arkham City (PlayStation 3) review

  • Score:
  • attackosaur wrote this review on .
  • 0 out of 0 Giant Bomb users found it helpful.

Full Assassin's Creed ahead! Sort of.

Arkham Asylum was great. Arkham City is good. The open world doesn't take long to navigate around at all - you can do it in a couple minutes from one side to the other - and there's really bugger all to do inside it beyond beating more dudes up. All it really does is give you a chance to run about as Bats, which is awesome for the first hour before you end up just legging it backwards and forwards between buildings like it's some kind of interactive load screen. The game is still incredibly linear and I didn't get the feeling I could affect the story at all as much as delay it with side missions. Having to trek back and forth through the city makes the linearity even more irritating.

All the gizmos are back from Asylum. There might be a couple of new ones - I can't remember exactly what was in Asylum - but there's nothing massively different that sticks out. You start with most of your gadgets ready and the upgrade system doesn't do anything dramatic, nothing that you'll use much anyway. There's no real sense of getting more awesome as a character, but you're flippin' Batman to start with - how more awesome d' you wanna be? I think the fake open world gives it a little bit of an RPG feeling, but all the fun stuff of an RPG - freedom, morality, character building - is nowhere to be seen. Fighting is still amazing, though I really don't like the sound effects. They're not weighty enough. Punches sound like little taps. This is Batman, dudes! He should goddamn PUMMEL people in the face!

The story's OK. Nice central idea, good ticking clock, but it does suffer from having to cram all the villains in (as Asylum did). There are a couple of cameos from other Bat-universe types, but it would've been nice to have them utilized better. How about a Sonic 2-style team-up with Robin? There are some Catwoman bits, but they're not important to the story and feel a bit jammed in. She controls very well, though, and is fun to kick people with.

Good game! It does new stuff and has a larger scope, but it all just makes it a little more boring.

0 Comments Refresh

Other reviews for Batman: Arkham City (PlayStation 3)

    A Safe Sequel to a Already Steller Product 0

    I have a lot of mixed emotions with Arkham City..... in one hand I loved the game where in the other I felt slighted. I want to give a fair review to a game I truly enjoyed but maybe my expectations were too high. The game built upon a great, surprising game, Arkham Asylum, that came out a few years ago which had minor issues but didn't take away from the experience at all. With that said, Arkham City is the same way. Minor issues here and there that I have with the side missions being to short,...

    1 out of 1 found this review helpful.

    Batman: Arkham City (PS3) Review 0

    If you would have told me when I was young that one of my favorite games of an entire generation of video game consoles would be a game based on Batman, I would have rolled my eyes and scoffed at you but that’s exactly what happened. Batman games were never anything great, only managing to squeeze out a decent game ever once in awhile but Arkham Asylum changed that. The atmosphere, wonderful voice acting and combat system made that game not just a good licensed game but a good game period....

    2 out of 2 found this review helpful.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.