Spoilers galore all throughout this thread, guys. Says so in the title. I assume there's no need for spoiler block, yes?
So at face value, the character of the Arkham Knight seems to exist mainly for a way to keep the word Arkham in the title. Not only that, but the fact that he's not exactly the main villain AND the fact that he just disappears after his reveal seems pretty....bad. The character Arkham Knight appears to just be there to have tanks battle your batmobile.
But this attitude doesn't give the game nearly enough credit! The title Arkham Knight is a double entendre. Arkham Knight also applies to Batman. Think about it, this series started in the asylum itself, moved to a city filled with the psychos, and now we're here. What is this game about? Batman dealing with HIS OWN sanity. He himself feels like he's becoming one of these freaks. The biggest one of all, in fact. I love the idea that Batman conquers his own delusion and deranged mind in the concluding chapter. He becomes the :"Arkham Knight" in that sense, defeating the craziness in his brain.
Now I know this may be such an obvious thing for smart folk to realize and also because double entendres are nothing new in Batman stories. For example, the title "The Dark Knight Rises" could apply to Bruce, Blake, and even Bane in that film. But the fact that I see so many people complaining about the Arkham Knight character himself feeling unimportant calls for this argument to be made in full, so here's my best attempt at spelling it out and defending the title which frankly I'm in love with now after thinking about it.
Sure the character is all over promo material and thus it could be interpreted as a bit of a fake out, Trust me I know why some would be disappointed by both the title and the character but try thinking of it in this light and I hope you can agree with me that this is a fitting title after all.
Log in to comment