Battlefield has it's up, and like any other shooter, it's downs. Are these holes really worth digging out of? Or should we just find a new place to dig?
Hmmm... Battlefield... Is it really worth your time?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I often have fun with it when I play it, so yeah.
The thing I find about the most fun multiplayer shooters is that there's always those times where you're really not having fun because of something. Battlefield has those dry moments where you're running around searching for guys or some fuckwad with a sniper rifle is killing you every time you turn around or, the worst, your team is full of idiots and you're pushed all the way back and can't move forwards.
But then, the great moments are very well worth it. I would describe them but that might cheapen their glory. Seriously, go watch the BF3 TNT and tell me that you don't think that some of those moments are stupendously magnificent.
@zombie2011: The scale, map size, player count (33 people including cameraman and C4 detonator) and the graphics?You can do stuff like that in the old Battlefield games and probably better in them? Battle For Britain in BF1942 is way cooler than anything in BF3 because everybody was in planes other than people doing AA, including bombers that had tons of people doing different jobs.
Ok how about this :D/Thread!
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.
Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.