Hmmm... Battlefield... Is it really worth your time?

Game » consists of 15 releases. First released on Oct 25, 2011

Battlefield 3 is DICE's third numerical installment in the Battlefield franchise. It features a single player and co-operative campaign, as well as an extensive multiplayer component.

Hmmm... Battlefield... Is it really worth your time?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#1 Posted by Grambo (21 posts) - 11 months, 7 days ago

Battlefield has it's up, and like any other shooter, it's downs. Are these holes really worth digging out of? Or should we just find a new place to dig?

#2 Posted by Jack268 (3386 posts) - 11 months, 7 days ago

Video games... are they worth our time?

#3 Edited by big_jon (5066 posts) - 11 months, 7 days ago

What is this, I don't even?

#4 Edited by AhmadMetallic (18957 posts) - 11 months, 7 days ago

Yes.

/Thread

#5 Edited by _Zombie_ (1287 posts) - 11 months, 7 days ago

Toast.. is it worth our time?

#6 Posted by Wacomole (732 posts) - 11 months, 7 days ago

Watches. Are they worth our time?

#7 Posted by mosdl (2995 posts) - 11 months, 7 days ago

Life, is it worth it...

#8 Posted by gunstar (219 posts) - 11 months, 7 days ago

Nope.

#9 Posted by zombie2011 (4657 posts) - 11 months, 7 days ago

@AhmadMetallic said:

Yes.

/Thread

Whats so great about this video? You can do this in pretty much any shooter.

#10 Posted by believer258 (7825 posts) - 11 months, 7 days ago

I often have fun with it when I play it, so yeah.

The thing I find about the most fun multiplayer shooters is that there's always those times where you're really not having fun because of something. Battlefield has those dry moments where you're running around searching for guys or some fuckwad with a sniper rifle is killing you every time you turn around or, the worst, your team is full of idiots and you're pushed all the way back and can't move forwards.

But then, the great moments are very well worth it. I would describe them but that might cheapen their glory. Seriously, go watch the BF3 TNT and tell me that you don't think that some of those moments are stupendously magnificent.

#11 Posted by AhmadMetallic (18957 posts) - 11 months, 7 days ago

@zombie2011: The scale, map size, player count (33 people including cameraman and C4 detonator) and the graphics?
No?

Ok how about this :D

/Thread!

#12 Posted by big_jon (5066 posts) - 11 months, 7 days ago

@Grambo: So was there even a point to this thread? Is that why you have not bothered to add anything to it?

#13 Posted by Ben_H (2656 posts) - 11 months, 7 days ago

@AhmadMetallic said:

@zombie2011: The scale, map size, player count (33 people including cameraman and C4 detonator) and the graphics?
No?

Ok how about this :D
/Thread!

You can do stuff like that in the old Battlefield games and probably better in them? Battle For Britain in BF1942 is way cooler than anything in BF3 because everybody was in planes other than people doing AA, including bombers that had tons of people doing different jobs.