i was playing with youtube doubler after watching this vid going around on r/gaming today

i was hyped when this game was announced but now its falling way back down to just plain modern military genericism, fighting generorrists in generistan as generica

i hope they show something unique with this game that will maybe stem this feeling of them just wasting great tech on horribly boring design (the crysis syndrome) ;-;

Wasted? what do you want? Fur in your face? some gentle jerk in you pants while playing? Or just blow you away while YOU!!!! think about games that have been?

Wasted? what do you want? Fur in your face? some gentle jerk in you pants while playing? Or just blow you away while YOU!!!! think about games that have been?  

@Vortexus1981 said:

Wasted? what do you want? Fur in your face? some gentle jerk in you pants while playing? Or just blow you away while YOU!!!! think about games that have been?  

 I would buy that game

er, the ea guy in the GT interview said we will definitely see mirror's edge in some way in the frostbite 2 engine. 

@Vortexus1981: i want something new, like what bf2 did for games at the time, this just looks like bc2:2 D:

You can't "waste" tech, so what are you talking about?

@Ahmad_Metallic: not a new game, just something new to the game, rather than just swapping weapons into different classes :[ (which too me is honestly the most interesting thing they have announced), maybe like some more depth to the game, building mechanics coming back (like artillery and comm stations) , a new revamped commander mode, maybe some new modes like a graw style enemy hunt mode ... right now its just looking like bc2 with better paint and jets D:

edit: or maybe shifting/tiered objectives in certain modes, like lets say you drop into a map and have to cap a control point, then you get that as a spawn point to then go and destroy some m-com stations (ala rush) and maybe have to capture some intel or something after that, or map specific like blow up a dam to allow progress to further parts of the mission

I want a Rampage game built in the Battlefield engine.

You saw a tiny pre-alpha 8v8 rush level with the sole purpose to show the engine, lighting and the feel of the combat. Maybe you should wait till they've announced what multiplayer features will be in or not before you go call "waste" and "BC2"?

Guess what. A lot of stuff happens between pre-alpha and gold.

I wanna see a Mirror's Edge 2 with that amazing engine

Don't judge a game before it comes out. We've only seen a couple of trailers and some minor gameplay. Maybe it will be just another military shooter but hey, I haven't played it yet! I've been shooting stuff in fps games since the original Doom and I am still not tired of it...

Did you know that games that involve guns, tanks, and planes often have explosions in them? 
 
Someone told me that one time. I don't really believe them.

@russythefox: Actually, they have not announced any final list of the modes and what the structure of team play will be. What we saw at E3 only showed us how the classes worked and that you can be in a squad. That's it. All we've heard are snippets of info that have gone from rumors to confirmed rumors.

Pretty sure one of the producers even said in an interview that they have a lot more in store for the game modes, beyond team deathmatch, rush and conquest.

@Ahmad_Metallic: not a new game, just something new to the game, rather than just swapping weapons into different classes :[ (which too me is honestly the most interesting thing they have announced), maybe like some more depth to the game, building mechanics coming back (like artillery and comm stations) , a new revamped commander mode, maybe some new modes like a graw style enemy hunt mode ... right now its just looking like bc2 with better paint and jets D:

edit: or maybe shifting/tiered objectives in certain modes, like lets say you drop into a map and have to cap a control point, then you get that as a spawn point to then go and destroy some m-com stations (ala rush) and maybe have to capture some intel or something after that, or map specific like blow up a dam to allow progress to further parts of the mission

I want a Rampage game built in the Battlefield engine.

There has been an incredible amount of judging the fuck out of games/systems/anything on this site based on very little information for the past few weeks.

it being soooooo far away is what is worrying me most of all about it, they should be doing something huge to come back rather than just put a coat of paint on bc2; when do we expect these major changes to happen? with a ton of series they never really change it up because they are so close together (like assassins creed 2 and brotherhood) with something, and with nearly 6 years away id expect them to go all out on it by putting as much into it as possible considering they did the same thing come bf2 after 1942 after a few years

Yes, well not every aspect of the game has been announced, so chill the fuck out .

Yawn, have you played it?  I admit Crysis 2 was disappointing, but I didn't know it until I had played it.  This whole thread is just another case of internet cynicism.

@Coombs said:

@Vortexus1981 said:

Wasted? what do you want? Fur in your face? some gentle jerk in you pants while playing? Or just blow you away while YOU!!!! think about games that have been?  

 I would buy that game

You a furry bro?

@Ahmad_Metallic: 

it being soooooo far away is what is worrying me most of all about it, they should be doing something huge to come back rather than just put a coat of paint on bc2; when do we expect these major changes to happen? with a ton of series they never really change it up because they are so close together (like assassins creed 2 and brotherhood) with something, and with nearly 6 years away id expect them to go all out on it by putting as much into it as possible considering they did the same thing come bf2 after 1942 after a few years

Threads like this make me laugh, BF3 is a modern military shooter, that's what it is. What are they to do so differently other than polish it? Would you rather they make it into some limbo clone or something? It's a fucking FPS set in modern times, and a polished, well made one at that. Do you expect the next Braid or something?

You can't "waste" tech, so what are you talking about?

I want people to wait for games to come out before calling them 2.5 versions of their prequels or shitting all over them.

@russythefox: ROFL actually that video sumps up pretty well the whole Modern Shooter "Ideas" going on.

I still might get BF3 thou.

Yeah, they should add chainsaws and flamethrowers...and sharks that shoot lasers out of their freakin eyes.

I agree, there needs to be a frostbite 2 game that doesn't involve a random war. Military games are some of the most pointless, stale genres that exist today, of course, to me. 

I agree, there needs to be a frostbite 2 game that doesn't involve a random war. Military games are some of the most pointless, stale genres that exist today, of course, to me. 

Whoever compares a Battlefield game to a Michael Bay film clearly has no idea about BF. Also this game hasn't even come out yet so let's just relax and wait to play the fucking game first and bash it later.

I want a Rampage game built in the Battlefield engine.

I wanna see a Mirror's Edge 2 with that amazing engine

You don't buy a Battlefield game for it's singleplayer mode.

Depends if the campaign ever gets more ambitious than just being another guided tour down the war funnel (which it won't).

If they figure out how to make suppressive fire effective in multiplayer, then that will be a pretty significant step forward for the genre imo. You can't really simulate combat without it.

IDK, personally I really like bf2 gameplay and hope that bf3 brings some of the feeling back along with new shit. I trust dice to make something kick ass.