Now I can only speak for the PS3 versions cause unfortunately I don't have an XBOX still, but after just playing the demo for BFBC2 I already am loving the game's multiplayer.
The first thing is the Maps (or the "Map" in BFBC2's case).
When playing MW2, I love sprinting across maps stabbing fools in mid-sprint and getting head shot's with dual pistols. But MW2 doesn't have a single map that I enjoy playing on, and frankly all the maps are really kind of boring. I just don't get the same thrill out of it as I do when I shoot an RPG at an emplacement on the third floor of some house and taking out the whole wall, revealing a sniper's nest only to take him out with my silenced SCAR rifle.
I could say more but I'd like to hear whatever one else thinks about the demo so far.
Battlefield: Bad Company 2
Game » consists of 26 releases. Released Mar 02, 2010
Battlefield: Bad Company 2 is the second installment in this spin-off Battlefield series. It has a more serious campaign and a vastly expanded multiplayer system.
Has Battlefield finally beat out MW2?
I don't understand why people keep comparing Battlefield to Call of Duty. Completely different kinds of games.
One is a great, longstanding series based around teamwork and fullscale tactics that continues to amaze, and the other is a shallow arcade shooter.
NEW GAME THAT ISN'T OUT YET IS BETTER THAN OLD GAME!1!111!1!11
One is more of an arcade style shooter and the other is more based in realism. OH MAN FORZA 4 IS WAY BETTER THAN OUTRUN!!!
" NEW GAME THAT ISN'T OUT YET IS BETTER THAN OLD GAME!1!111!1!11 One is more of an arcade style shooter and the other is more based in realism. OH MAN FORZA 4 IS WAY BETTER THAN OUTRUN!!! "There's nothing realistic about a battlefield game, but yes as you say they aren't very comparable. However, this same garbage that people keep throwing about"THE GAME ISN'T EVEN OUT YET HOW CAN IT BE BETTER" is really dumb. Its common sense why its dumb, so I won't bother pointing it out.
People really need to stop making dumb ass topics like these. The game isn't fucking out yet, it's a demo. Wait and see about the real game just like everybody else.
First off, I disagree about people saying they are "totally different games." When you start splitting modern warfare semi-realistic team-based FPSes into multiple categories, you really are going too far. Sure, some people will like one game and some will like the other, but that doesn't mean they're apples and oranges. They're oranges and tangerines at most.
Second, I think the OP's question itself is misguided, not least because it probably should have been MW in general, not MW2, to which BC2 is Battlefield's first competitor (unless you count Battlefield Heroes, and you shouldn't.) Call of Duty was primarily a single player console experience until CoD 4, and Battlefield was primarily a multiplayer PC experience until BC1. At the convergence of CoD4 and BC1, the two series collided on the consoles and CoD won. So here's round two. There's no "finally" involved, and it's too early to say.
It's not that I'm comparing just based on the gameplay. It's obvious that the first Bad Company game was made to get in the "modern shooter" type market, however the overall feel of the game is very different. And right now the DEMO of BC2 just feels better and more exciting then the "bigger, badder, better," MW2. Yes they are completely different game's but are you having "fun" playing BC2 as compared to MW2.
Basically do you like class-based-large-scale-battles, or the smaller-scale-just-shoot-the-other-guy type thing.
Battlefield has always beat out COD to me... just not in sales. This time I expect the sales gap to be much smaller though, with MW2 remaining in the lead as the mainstream game of choice. But I also expect this to be the most successful Battlefield game yet.
Maybe it's all hope. I don't want Battlefield to become more mainstream than COD.
And WTF @ BC being made to get into the "'modern shooter' type market". BF was "modern" waaaay waaaay before COD ever thought about it. This is the type of stuff I have a problem with.
Modern Warfare 2 is a arcade shooter.
Battlefield Bad Company 2 is a team based objective shooter, or whatever the hell you want to call it.
Its subjective. There is no "beating" each other. Battlefield and Call of Duty are both long standing solid series that attract different fanbases.
" People really need to stop making dumb ass topics like these. The game isn't fucking out yet, it's a demo. Wait and see about the real game just like everybody else. "This, I agree with fully. However I must say that I am a huge fan of the Battlefield franchise, plus theres also the fact that MW2 and BF:BC2 are completely different games, and each have their own ups and downs to them.
Besides I could give two shits less about the Multiplayer.... I care more about Haggard getting his Truckasauras Rex!
" @baconbits33 said:huh?Besides I could give two shits less about the Multiplayer.So you're the one. "
im going with they are different types of shooters. but MAG beats both of them and will be my online shooter for a while.
MAG>>>>>>MW2=bfbc2
" @shadows_kill: What do you consider to be better about MAG? "love the community. example i dont think i have played any other shooter with medics that actualy heal you. i am loving the gameplay its just... fun. NO lag at all (but i have been disconnected once or twice). the setup for unlocking equipment. lastly choosing 1 group and you will always play as that group in bad company and cod you really only care which side you spawn on while in mag you stick with it.
overall its the gameplay though its just fun.
" @sodiumCyclops: its a ps3 exclusive obviously "yes cause that makes a game so much better......
" @sodiumCyclops said:You see, those points don't make anything about MAG seem more appealing to me at all. Probably the same for a large number of players. Still, good to see people actually playing MAG." @shadows_kill: What do you consider to be better about MAG? "love the community. example i dont think i have played any other shooter with medics that actualy heal you. i am loving the gameplay its just... fun. NO lag at all (but i have been disconnected once or twice). the setup for unlocking equipment. lastly choosing 1 group and you will always play as that group in bad company and cod you really only care which side you spawn on while in mag you stick with it. overall its the gameplay though its just fun. "
The beta beats the full version of MW2 for me. I've already said a lot on the subject so I won't say much more than that here.
" @Fullmetal216: I'm saving all my real opinions for the actual release of course. And I'm not trying to start a freaking nerd war here, but the DEMO is fun and I just want to hear other peoples opinion. It's not my fault that people see theses posts and bitch that they aren't the same game when that isn't the point. Just wanna know who is digging the new to-be-released game. "The title of your topic says otherwise.
" @baconbits33: Nothing really. It's just that playing a Battlefield game only for the singleplayer is like playing a Total War game and not doing any RTS battles. Some folks just prefer to play that way. But you might as well just play another game, is the way I see it. "That doesn't make any sense...... You do realize that right?
I play the multiplayer, but I end up getting all the achievements in like a couple days and I get bored with it, while I'll play the campaign over and over just so I can see what different ways I can approach the missions, it's one of the few shooters that actually has a really well done single player.
And i do play Total War.... your analogy makes no sense at all.... The RTS battles are in the single player, what you should have said is: It's like playing a Total War game and not going doing the multiplayer, that at least would of made sense.
" @MrKlorox said:No, it makes perfect sense because the multiplayer is what makes it a Battlefield game. In fact there have only been two previous Battlefields (out of eight, not even counting expansions) that even had a singleplayer campaign. The Total War analogy makes sense because the RTS battles are what makes it a Total War game. Otherwise when you click auto-resolve on your battles, you might as well just be playing Civilization or Colonization." @baconbits33: Nothing really. It's just that playing a Battlefield game only for the singleplayer is like playing a Total War game and not doing any RTS battles. Some folks just prefer to play that way. But you might as well just play another game, is the way I see it. "That doesn't make any sense...... You do realize that right? I play the multiplayer, but I end up getting all the achievements in like a couple days and I get bored with it, while I'll play the campaign over and over just so I can see what different ways I can approach the missions, it's one of the few shooters that actually has a really well done single player. And i do play Total War.... your analogy makes no sense at all.... The RTS battles are in the single player, what you should have said is: It's like playing a Total War game and not going doing the multiplayer, that at least would of made sense. "
Battlefield bet out MW a long time ago, before both MW games had been made in fact. It's called BF2.
The only thing I like about MW2 is running around with my knife stabbing dudes in the face, and no i don't use care package, just marathon and lightweight. I love sniping and I feel that battlefield does it best, plus their maps are bigger and better, and they have vehicles so yea I think battlefield has beaten MW2.
Oh ok now I see what your getting at.... but meh, don't get me wrong I love the multiplayer but like I said: Have the achievements in a couple of days and get bored, now if my friends actually played something other then Fallout and COD and joined me in a match every now and then I would really enjoy playing the multiplayer. But if you've ever just jumped into the multiplayer, after like 3 matches you get bored cause most of the other players don't have a microphone so all your doing is playing all by yourself and it gets boring very fast. At least when your playing single player you get the remarks from B-Company and have the luxury of messaging your friends on Live. But hey that's just me, you probably have completely different experiences with the online." @baconbits33 said:
No, it makes perfect sense because the multiplayer is what makes it a Battlefield game. In fact there have only been two previous Battlefields (out of eight, not even counting expansions) that even had a singleplayer campaign. The Total War analogy makes sense because the RTS battles are what makes it a Total War game. Otherwise when you click auto-resolve on your battles, you might as well just be playing Civilization or Colonization. "" @MrKlorox said:
" @baconbits33: Nothing really. It's just that playing a Battlefield game only for the singleplayer is like playing a Total War game and not doing any RTS battles. Some folks just prefer to play that way. But you might as well just play another game, is the way I see it. "That doesn't make any sense...... You do realize that right? I play the multiplayer, but I end up getting all the achievements in like a couple days and I get bored with it, while I'll play the campaign over and over just so I can see what different ways I can approach the missions, it's one of the few shooters that actually has a really well done single player. And i do play Total War.... your analogy makes no sense at all.... The RTS battles are in the single player, what you should have said is: It's like playing a Total War game and not going doing the multiplayer, that at least would of made sense. "
I've actually never used the auto-resolve function with Total War and I've logged in a lot of hours on that series..... Does it just like bring up a battle summary?
" @systech: I know maybe 3 people who still play MW2, but right now my friends list is filled with BC2 Demo, BC2 Demo, BC2 Demo, BC2 Demo. "Same here, everyone I actually play online games with in general doesn't really play MW2 anymore, and the ones that do, aren't going to when BC2 comes out.
I donno it just seems like BF and CoD are always releasing games within like 6 months (give or take) of each other. And first impressions of BC made me think that EA needed a Modern Shooter to compete, at least that is just how it felt to me. Doesn't really matter either way, cause I'm totally loving BC2 right now and am glad that DICE is putting it out.
What's really sparking my interest now though is, what DICE is gonna do with Medal of Honor. Lol, off topic but whatever.
" @MrKlorox: I donno it just seems like BF and CoD are always releasing games within like 6 months (give or take) of each other. And first impressions of BC made me think that EA needed a Modern Shooter to compete, at least that is just how it felt to me. Doesn't really matter either way, cause I'm totally loving BC2 right now and am glad that DICE is putting it out. What's really sparking my interest now though is, what DICE is gonna do with Medal of Honor. Lol, off topic but whatever. "Even of the new MoH actually turns out well, I think its pretty safe to say it really won't be much in the long run as far as multiplayer goes. I think your assessment of them making BC though to compete for a modern shooter is a bit off. They wanted to make a streamlined, bit more simplified console BF in the vein of BF2(which came far before Cod4 or MW2 and was a modern shooter), and that they did. I liked BC1 but I felt it had a lot of problems. BC2 surpasses it in every way, and since they took out some of the simplified class structure from the first and added more things, it feels like the real successor to BF2 in my opinion.
Dice already did the modern shooter thing a while before IW did, so thats all I'm saying. Even the first BC was still nothing like a Call of Duty game.
" NEW GAME THAT ISN'T OUT YET IS BETTER THAN OLD GAME!1!111!1!11 One is more of an arcade style shooter and the other is more based in realism. OH MAN FORZA 4 IS WAY BETTER THAN OUTRUN!!! "Rallisports challenge 2 is the best racing game ever made (according to me and I have played others) and that was released in 2004.
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment