Normally a suggestion like this is just like chumming the waters in some forums but I'll not trying to troll here.

I picked up BF:BC after reading the GB review and I have to say I was a bit disappointed.  By no means is it a bad game but I've found it to be fairly unpolished with lots of minor bugs / flaws here or there.  Anyone else feel the same way?

I havent played much but id have to agree. Still enjoying it though

I actually never gave the game another thought until I saw Jeff's review and decided to try out the demo which convinced me to buy the game.

What kind of flaws/bugs did you find? I haven't really noticed anything.

I love Bad Company. The single-player is decent, but the multiplayer really makes the game.

Bad Company is an amazing game. It has a good single-player mode, and the multiplayer is amazing. It is the best "modern warfare" FPS out for the 360 (I  don't know about the PS3). Thats right, you  heard what I said: Bad Company.> COD4! I'm not say COD4's bad, but BC is better;There is so much crap going on in BC. It isn't a perfect game by any means, but it is very good. It deserves 5 stars.

It does have its flaws and bad points but once you can see past or get used to them its an awesome game, especially the multi-player.

To the thread creator: Try playing the game some more. It will take a while to get use to it and once you get around the flaws, you will be hooked, especially the multiplayer. Overall, it's a very addictive game that give you that feeling of...<oh, i'll just play another game until i'm done> and next thing you know it's 2 in the morning and are wondering where time went?

More like underrated

I've played a bit, but I like what I played. The one thing that stuck with me is the sound design. The guns sounds like they handout some major PAIN!

Whats unpolished about it? It's one of the better looking games I've seen in a while.

There are many bugs within Bad Company, especially with the multiplayer, but when you have a persistant stats/ranking system, there are bound to be. Also, any new release will have bugs-a-plenty, it's just the way it is. Game developing is a long, hard process, which surprisingly, most people don't seem to see. (Not directing that at you guys exactly, but you can probably see where i'm coming from).

I think the game is fantastic, maybe Jeff went a little far with how great the explosions are but his review was enough for me to go out and get BF and I have yet to regret it.

This site is over rated if that is what you mean

The effect of firing a weapon is excellent in terms of sound, recoil and its effect on the environment. That's what makes it fun I guess.
I did find it very hard to see the enemy most of the time, having to rely on the radar to even give me a clue as to where anyone was.

Yous are all bashing it yet it got 5/5 here at GiantBomb which tells us they need to get their review system sorted out.

"This site is over rated if that is what you mean"

Care to explain what these "bugs/flaws" are?

I like that game, not overrated at all.

I'm enjoying the single player alot. I haven't done alot of multiplayer, but from what I've played I'm not a fan.

I decided not to get the game because i am still playing Call of Duty 4 multiplayer.

The first time i played the demo I actually didn't like it, but i gave it another chance, now I own the game and LOVE IT!

"The first time i played the demo I actually didn't like it, but i gave it another chance, now I own the game and LOVE IT!
"

I think the minor flaws this game has doesn't detract from the gameplay at all. I have only played the multiplayer but I think this game is easily one of the best of the year.

I didn't think it was that great. It's fun but not as good as the other Battlefield games.

I played the demo and didn't really think much of it. I think it was mentioned in the 1up show that the enemy AI finds out where you are way too easily, and I totally agree. Even if I was hiding, the enemies would know where I was and start shooting at me. Made things very difficult. Personally I'm going to stick with cod4.

I don't feel this game is underated at all, what bugs/flaws are you talkin about? I can't stop playing it.

I beg to differ. Multiplayer is a blast. I guess, if you don't play it online, you will never get the 'goods' of BF:BC. Singleplayer is merely a very elaborate tutorial. At least, that's what it was to me. Clocked in 4d of multiplayer playtime  already. It only gets better! Can't stop playing until I get to be the Nr.1! Just pick up a XBOX live gold sub and play it online. It's full of win. I guess, that's what's in those crates...  100% PURE WIN!

yer, i wasnt supper impressed by it. In my review i talked a little more in depth of what i thought of it but the main thing is that it was a bit rough arround the edges but if you go into it with low expectations you will be pleased

"To the thread creator: Try playing the game some more. It will take a while to get use to it and once you get around the flaws, you will be hooked, especially the multiplayer. Overall, it's a very addictive game that give you that feeling of...<oh, i'll just play another game until i'm done> and next thing you know it's 2 in the morning and are wondering where time went?"

"Yous are all bashing it yet it got 5/5 here at GiantBomb which tells us they need to get their review system sorted out."

I think it's great game. Really deserved the rating it got.

It's ok, worth playing, but nothing special really. The singleplayer is really repetitive and rather boring, and the multiplayer only has one game mode, and doesn't have an over abundance of maps, leading it to become dull  pretty fast as well.

Nope. Awesome game.

"Normally a suggestion like this is just like chumming the waters in some forums but I'll not trying to troll here.

I picked up BF:BC after reading the GB review and I have to say I was a bit disappointed.  By no means is it a bad game but I've found it to be fairly unpolished with lots of minor bugs / flaws here or there.  Anyone else feel the same way?
"

"This site is over rated if that is what you mean"

For me, the game is fun, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's a "good" game.  A five-out-of-five is a bit high for this game, I'd give it four or maybe four and a half.  I've only taken a few steps in Multiplayer and I've yet to beat SP yet, but I've not seen any bugs.  The games character models look good, but there is an overall lack of variety in both buildings and the way buildings crumble.  The strange constant haze that covers the screen is only noticeable in a couple of instances (particular when you are looking over vistas, etc) and the tank drives like garbage.  Other then the small flaws that I pointed out, the game is still really damned fun at the end of the day, but just slightly undeserving of a 5/5.

"More like underrated"

You just need to know that Jeff likes to blow shit up so that's definitely a plus for him.

I absolutely love the game.

I played the demo and thought this game was junk.  I hate to compare it to Call of Duty 4, but compared to that game, the shooting and controls in Bad Company felt like crap.

i personally think it's underrated. I love this game. Multiplayer is pretty ballin'.

It just doesn't have that awesome feeling that BF2 on the PC has...

"It just doesn't have that awesome feeling that BF2 on the PC has..."

BF:BC was terrible.

Funny thing:  I absolutely 100% HATED the demo.  Couldn't stand it.  I wrote the game off strictly because the single player portion seemed to have stupid ass AI and barely any enemies anywhere.  The multiplayer was something I didn't really play much during the demo, but it seemed too slow for me.

"Gizmo said:

"It just doesn't have that awesome feeling that BF2 on the PC has..."

That's because it's completely inferior to BF2."

"Gizmo said:

"It just doesn't have that awesome feeling that BF2 on the PC has..."

That's because it's completely inferior to BF2."