Oh snap!

Topic started by AaronBelfast on Oct. 4, 2008. Last post by BengoshiSan 1 year, 11 months ago.

117 results
1
2
3
4
5
Next
Last

Post by AaronBelfast (993 posts) See mini bio Level 3

Seriously, 2K really think I'm going to pay more for a inferior game when I get the better version alot cheaper...

PS3

360

Thanks but no thanks 2K, you can keep your half assed port.

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by Sir_Ragnarok (3,219 posts) See mini bio Level 13 / 1822 ACH / 36906 P

I have a hard time accepting the veracity of these screenshots.

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by Jayge (9,091 posts) See mini bio Level 8 / 986 ACH / 16625 P

It took me a minute or two to actually see the ridiculous differences. At first glance the PS3 looks slightly better in terms of lighting and shit, but man it's totally washed out and the textures are absolute ass!

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by AaronBelfast (993 posts) See mini bio Level 3

Sir_Ragnarok said:

"I have a hard time accepting the veracity of these screenshots. "

2K Community Manager admits it's a half assed port

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by brukaoru (3,393 posts) See mini bio Level 9 / 429 ACH / 6812 P

Guess I'll be getting the 360 version. I was going to go with the PS3 version if they had the same limited edition because I want the Big Daddy figurine. I guess I'll be trying eBay.

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by get2sammyb (5,268 posts) See mini bio Level 12 / 46 ACH / 725 P

Hmmm obviously a quick glance at those screens says that the 360 version is a mile-better... but they're not exactly the best photos to begin with are they?

When playing the demo the game looked awesome. But then I've never experienced it on the 360 so I can't comment.

Did you take these screens yourself or did you get them elsewhere?

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by AaronBelfast (993 posts) See mini bio Level 3

get2sammyb said:

"Hmmm obviously a quick glance at those screens says that the 360 version is a mile-better... but they're not exactly the best photos to begin with are they?

When playing the demo the game looked awesome. But then I've never experienced it on the 360 so I can't comment.

Did you take these screens yourself or did you get them elsewhere?"

Elsewhere. It's been proven as others have tried out the PS3 demo and done comparisons.

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by Max_Chill (142 posts) See mini bio Level 1

WTF!!!!!!!!! LMAO!!!!!! .......its..........its............RAW square ps1 quality Pixels on the ps3 version. wow. thats pretty SAD

and its not fake, go play the ps3 demo, it looks exactly like that

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26619695&page=3

Edited 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by AaronBelfast (993 posts) See mini bio Level 3

Max_Chill said:

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26619695&page=3
"

Just saw that thread, their going crazy. Well, that's SW for you.

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by Coltonio7 (3,017 posts) See mini bio Level 13 / 1399 ACH / 19160 P

=/ even less of a reason to get it.

I like the Bioshock theme for PS3 though =D

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by Kush (6,803 posts) See mini bio Level 13 / 6189 ACH / 132160 P

Well I was never really for this port, but thought it was good to get this game to the biggest possible audience...but if it's just going to be a half-ass port, why bother? ...plus @AaronBelfast: your new avatar reminds me of those old Flintstones ice cream sticks.

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by Karmum (10,819 posts) See mini bio Level 18 / 2908 ACH / 70905 P

Online Now

I love how people begin to say how its the console's fault, yet, it is probably just lazy developers who didn't take the time to make the textures look somewhat decent.

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by jakob187 (13,087 posts) See mini bio Level 26 / 3075 ACH / 58085 P

It's PS3. Paperweights do this kind of thing.

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by AaronBelfast (993 posts) See mini bio Level 3

Kush said:

@AaronBelfast: your new avatar reminds me of those old Flintstones ice cream sticks."

I changed it to blend in with the green Online Now function. I may change my allignment to Microsoft, just to even things out.

Edited 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by jakob187 (13,087 posts) See mini bio Level 26 / 3075 ACH / 58085 P

Karmum said:

"I love how people begin to say how its the console's fault, yet, it is probably just lazy developers who didn't take the time to make the textures look somewhat decent."

Ken Levine and crew? Lazy? Seriously?

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by Kush (6,803 posts) See mini bio Level 13 / 6189 ACH / 132160 P

Karmum said:

"I love how people begin to say how its the console's fault, yet, it is probably just lazy developers who didn't take the time to make the textures look somewhat decent."

People always like to blame the easy target. It's true that it has nothing to do with the system and is purely because of the developer. It could be because the PS3 is said to be a difficult machine to work with, but that isn't really a good excuse.

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by jakob187 (13,087 posts) See mini bio Level 26 / 3075 ACH / 58085 P

Kush said:

"Karmum said:
"I love how people begin to say how its the console's fault, yet, it is probably just lazy developers who didn't take the time to make the textures look somewhat decent."
People always like to blame the easy target. It's true that it has nothing to do with the system and is purely because of the developer. It could be because the PS3 is said to be a difficult machine to work with, but that isn't really a good excuse for anyone but PS3 owners because of their inability to face the fact that they bought a big black paperweight."

FIXED XD

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by Karmum (10,819 posts) See mini bio Level 18 / 2908 ACH / 70905 P

Online Now

jakob187 said:

"Kush said:
"Karmum said:
"I love how people begin to say how its the console's fault, yet, it is probably just lazy developers who didn't take the time to make the textures look somewhat decent."
People always like to blame the easy target. It's true that it has nothing to do with the system and is purely because of the developer. It could be because the PS3 is said to be a difficult machine to work with, but that isn't really a good excuse for anyone but PS3 owners because of their inability to face the fact that they bought a big black paperweight."
FIXED XD"

Contrary to belief, I don't see how the PS3 is a 'paperweight.' If anything, I'd consider the 360 to be a paperweight. Hell, there is a good chance your 360 will RROD. I'm not hoping that for my 360, though. :(

By the way, that is the definition of a paperweight. Something that is not working.

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by jakob187 (13,087 posts) See mini bio Level 26 / 3075 ACH / 58085 P

Karmum said:

"By the way, that is the definition of a paperweight. Something that is not working."

With the lack of worthwhile games on the PS3...I don't see how ANYONE'S is actually "working".

buh-duh-ching

Edited 1 year, 11 months ago

Post by Sir_Ragnarok (3,219 posts) See mini bio Level 13 / 1822 ACH / 36906 P

Really, guys? Really? We're going to start a console war over this?

Neither of the two are paperweights. There shouldn't be anymore discussion about it than that.

On the note of the textures--if it is real, and these shots are indicative of the final product, there is some serious hell to be paid for the programmers on 2K's PS3 front. This is unacceptable.

Posted 1 year, 11 months ago

117 results
1
2
3
4
5
Next
Last

	natetodamax 37 posts
	jakob187 25 posts
	Sir_Ragnarok 23 posts
	Demilich 21 posts
	Arkthemaniac 17 posts
	HandsomeDead 17 posts
	Jayge 15 posts
	AaronBelfast 14 posts
	atejas 14 posts
	daniel_beck_90 13 posts

BioShock Forum

Oh snap!