Oh snap!

Topic started by AaronBelfast on Oct. 4, 2008. Last post by BengoshiSan 1 year, 4 months ago.

Post by AaronBelfast (993 posts) See mini bio

Seriously, 2K really think I'm going to pay more for a inferior game when I get the better version alot cheaper...

PS3

360

Thanks but no thanks 2K, you can keep your half assed port.

Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by Sir_Ragnarok (2,354 posts) See mini bio 1529 ACH / 31186 P

I have a hard time accepting the veracity of these screenshots.

Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by Jayge (9,082 posts) See mini bio 954 ACH / 16150 P

It took me a minute or two to actually see the ridiculous differences. At first glance the PS3 looks slightly better in terms of lighting and shit, but man it's totally washed out and the textures are absolute ass!

Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by AaronBelfast (993 posts) See mini bio

Sir_Ragnarok said:

"I have a hard time accepting the veracity of these screenshots. "

2K Community Manager admits it's a half assed port

Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by brukaoru (3,373 posts) See mini bio 373 ACH / 5488 P

Guess I'll be getting the 360 version. I was going to go with the PS3 version if they had the same limited edition because I want the Big Daddy figurine. I guess I'll be trying eBay.

Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by get2sammyb (4,634 posts) See mini bio 46 ACH / 725 P

Hmmm obviously a quick glance at those screens says that the 360 version is a mile-better... but they're not exactly the best photos to begin with are they?

When playing the demo the game looked awesome. But then I've never experienced it on the 360 so I can't comment.

Did you take these screens yourself or did you get them elsewhere?

Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by AaronBelfast (993 posts) See mini bio

get2sammyb said:

"Hmmm obviously a quick glance at those screens says that the 360 version is a mile-better... but they're not exactly the best photos to begin with are they?

When playing the demo the game looked awesome. But then I've never experienced it on the 360 so I can't comment.

Did you take these screens yourself or did you get them elsewhere?"

Elsewhere. It's been proven as others have tried out the PS3 demo and done comparisons.

Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by Max_Chill (142 posts) See mini bio

WTF!!!!!!!!! LMAO!!!!!! .......its..........its............RAW square ps1 quality Pixels on the ps3 version. wow. thats pretty SAD

and its not fake, go play the ps3 demo, it looks exactly like that

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26619695&page=3

Edited 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by AaronBelfast (993 posts) See mini bio

Max_Chill said:

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26619695&page=3
"

Just saw that thread, their going crazy. Well, that's SW for you.

Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by Coltonio7 (2,858 posts) See mini bio 1192 ACH / 15765 P

=/ even less of a reason to get it.

I like the Bioshock theme for PS3 though =D

Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by Kush (6,803 posts) See mini bio 5509 ACH / 120382 P

Moderator

Well I was never really for this port, but thought it was good to get this game to the biggest possible audience...but if it's just going to be a half-ass port, why bother? ...plus @AaronBelfast: your new avatar reminds me of those old Flintstones ice cream sticks.

Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by Karmum (10,338 posts) See mini bio 2765 ACH / 67395 P

Online Now

I love how people begin to say how its the console's fault, yet, it is probably just lazy developers who didn't take the time to make the textures look somewhat decent.

Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by jakob187 (10,508 posts) See mini bio 2361 ACH / 45030 P

It's PS3. Paperweights do this kind of thing.

Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by AaronBelfast (993 posts) See mini bio

Kush said:

@AaronBelfast: your new avatar reminds me of those old Flintstones ice cream sticks."

I changed it to blend in with the green Online Now function. I may change my allignment to Microsoft, just to even things out.

Edited 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by jakob187 (10,508 posts) See mini bio 2361 ACH / 45030 P

Karmum said:

"I love how people begin to say how its the console's fault, yet, it is probably just lazy developers who didn't take the time to make the textures look somewhat decent."

Ken Levine and crew? Lazy? Seriously?

Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by Kush (6,803 posts) See mini bio 5509 ACH / 120382 P

Moderator

Karmum said:

"I love how people begin to say how its the console's fault, yet, it is probably just lazy developers who didn't take the time to make the textures look somewhat decent."

People always like to blame the easy target. It's true that it has nothing to do with the system and is purely because of the developer. It could be because the PS3 is said to be a difficult machine to work with, but that isn't really a good excuse.

Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by jakob187 (10,508 posts) See mini bio 2361 ACH / 45030 P

Kush said:

"Karmum said:
"I love how people begin to say how its the console's fault, yet, it is probably just lazy developers who didn't take the time to make the textures look somewhat decent."
People always like to blame the easy target. It's true that it has nothing to do with the system and is purely because of the developer. It could be because the PS3 is said to be a difficult machine to work with, but that isn't really a good excuse for anyone but PS3 owners because of their inability to face the fact that they bought a big black paperweight."

FIXED XD

Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by Karmum (10,338 posts) See mini bio 2765 ACH / 67395 P

Online Now

jakob187 said:

"Kush said:
"Karmum said:
"I love how people begin to say how its the console's fault, yet, it is probably just lazy developers who didn't take the time to make the textures look somewhat decent."
People always like to blame the easy target. It's true that it has nothing to do with the system and is purely because of the developer. It could be because the PS3 is said to be a difficult machine to work with, but that isn't really a good excuse for anyone but PS3 owners because of their inability to face the fact that they bought a big black paperweight."
FIXED XD"

Contrary to belief, I don't see how the PS3 is a 'paperweight.' If anything, I'd consider the 360 to be a paperweight. Hell, there is a good chance your 360 will RROD. I'm not hoping that for my 360, though. :(

By the way, that is the definition of a paperweight. Something that is not working.

Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by jakob187 (10,508 posts) See mini bio 2361 ACH / 45030 P

Karmum said:

"By the way, that is the definition of a paperweight. Something that is not working."

With the lack of worthwhile games on the PS3...I don't see how ANYONE'S is actually "working".

buh-duh-ching

Edited 1 year, 4 months ago

Post by Sir_Ragnarok (2,354 posts) See mini bio 1529 ACH / 31186 P

Really, guys? Really? We're going to start a console war over this?

Neither of the two are paperweights. There shouldn't be anymore discussion about it than that.

On the note of the textures--if it is real, and these shots are indicative of the final product, there is some serious hell to be paid for the programmers on 2K's PS3 front. This is unacceptable.

Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

130 results
1
2
3
4
5
Next
Last

	natetodamax 31 posts
	jakob187 24 posts
	Demilich 21 posts
	Sir_Ragnarok 20 posts
	Arkthemaniac 17 posts
	HandsomeDead 16 posts
	dcpc10 16 posts
	Jayge 15 posts
	AaronBelfast 14 posts
	atejas 14 posts

BioShock Forum

Oh snap!