Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    Brink

    Game » consists of 10 releases. Released May 10, 2011

    A multiplayer-focused, class-based first-person shooter running on id Tech 4, in which oppressive soldiers and anarchistic terrorists battle for the few remaining resources on a failed paradise known as the Ark.

    epicsteve's Brink (Xbox 360) review

    Avatar image for epicsteve
    • Score:
    • epicsteve wrote this review on .
    • 14 out of 17 Giant Bomb users found it helpful.
    • epicsteve has written a total of 87 reviews. The last one was for Outlast
    • This review received 7 comments

    Collapses under its own weight in issues.

    No Caption Provided

    Brink attempts to differentiate itself from standard conventional shooters, like Call of Duty and Halo as much as possible. Unfortunately there are too many issues that bog down the game. Splash Damage, the studio that brought you Enemy Territory: Quake Wars, attempted to make Brink a breath of fresh air in the shooter genre, implementing several neat ideas. Despite the effort of being different, Brink only manages to be on the verge of resembling anything fun. The dull combat and endless list of issues just makes me appreciate how well those conventional shooters work.

    Like Quake Wars, Brink is a class-based multiplayer shooter. The game puts objectives ahead of kills, making teamwork the focus. The majority of your character progression will come from performing your class role and completing objectives throughout a match. The structure of the game is decent. However, the lack of content is what really holds Brink back. There are eight maps, which would be an alright volume in most cases. The issue is that Brink doesn’t have traditional modes. Instead, you will sit through the same cutscenes, complete the same objectives, and probably fight matches the same way every time. With Brink’s maps having a specific purpose, it makes for a repetitive experience.

    Brink is virtually the same online and offline. In fact, the campaign is also the competitive multiplayer…and the co-op. For conflicts that aren’t that interesting to begin with, Splash Damage recycled them across all modes. You can instantly pick to play any level from the start, just to show how little the narrative matters. Once you decide upon which match you want to play, you have to choose to play with all bots, play with real players against bots, or a versus game with both teams comprising of people. It’s a ridicules system that puts a spotlight on the cheap feel of the Brink. There’s no “online” button on the menus, or a quick match option. The game boils down to “Hey, wanna play Brink? Do you want bots?”

    Playing singleplayer is simply not applicable for anyone wanting to enjoy the game. The bots are completely unreliable. With Brink being an objective based game, you’re going to have to tackle all the tasks yourself and have the bots fight one another in the background. Enemy bots will sometimes just stare at you and forget to fight back, but other times they’ll be on your ass throughout an entire segment of the match. I can’t even say it’s a rubber band AI issue, the difficulty of the bots appears totally random. Despite picking Versus Mode to play with humans, the match will fill in all the player gaps with bots. Which ended up being the bulk of most teams being bots. There isn’t any obvious indication on who’s a bot and when a human joins the game. This puts the player in an unfortunate circumstance of being forced to play with and against bots 100% of the time in some capacity.

    This is assuming you can actually get into a game to begin with. Brink is bad at working. You can generally get an operational game of co-op going, but getting anything beyond one team of human players together is impossible. Even in co-op when a team of eight is nearly full, the frame rate drops significantly. Despite playing the game since the morning of release, I have never completed a game of Versus. The lag makes Brink unplayable. Despite me literally turning off all my wireless devices at home to free some bandwidth, Brink’s online modes are unplayable. Which is a pretty nasty con for an online game. This issue is widespread across the Xbox 360 and PC versions of the game. Finding matches and bots aren’t the online’s only problem. The lack of a lobby system makes getting together with friends more of a hassle than it needs to be. It’s 2011, joining a game through my friends list isn’t ideal.

    Even if a patch releases that fixes all the network issues, Brink is simply not a fun game to play. The guns aren’t fun to use, and other weapons such as grenades just feel weak. The unlock system forces you to pick a go-to class at a certain point, but that doesn’t make sense due to the need to switch classes in matches to overcome obstacles. There’s an unlock system that boils down to obtaining goofy stuff to make your character wear and utilitarian items for whatever class you choose. It’s difficult to keep track of how much your character is progressing match to match. Everything from the combat to the game’s presentation doesn’t have any flash to it. Brink has a cheap feel to it.

    Brink has a bunch of great ideas that break the mold of conventional shooters. However, none of those ideas develop into anything meaningful due to game-breaking issues. It’s as if Splash Damage took notes on everything they didn’t like about Call of Duty and made the antithesis of it without thinking about what makes those type of games work. Brink is a bunch of non-sense and broken netcode in a box. You can’t take away any specific issue Brink has to make it an enjoyable game. Splash Damage’s latest collapses under it’s own weight of problems.

    -Steven Beynon

    7 Comments

    Avatar image for neoimperialist
    Neoimperialist

    8

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By Neoimperialist

    Ha, It's nice to see Bethesda finally getting what it deserves for publishing crappy games.  It seems that this one was released almost simultaneously with a patch.  I chose to avoid it entirely simply because it had Bethesda's name on it.  Seems it was the right call.

    Avatar image for teran
    Teran

    876

    Forum Posts

    45

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 1

    Edited By Teran
    @EpicSteve: You make a good point the internet.  I'm not sure how it works on the consoles but you more or less can create a lobby in the pc version.  If you want to just play with friends you can use a dedicated server, or create a private game and invite your friends directly (or give them the password). 
    Avatar image for epicsteve
    EpicSteve

    6908

    Forum Posts

    13016

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 89

    User Lists: 11

    Edited By EpicSteve
    @Teran said:
    @EpicSteve: If the online doesn't work, you forgot to mention that in your review.  Your review contradicts my personal experience with the game and you have under rated the game so significantly it is difficult to take your opinion seriously.  Why you would prefer sitting around in a lobby waiting I will never understand, it must be a console gamer thing.If you are not going to be honest in your reviews, I hope no one factors your opinion when deciding whether to purchase or not.
    I can only speak from my experience. This is why the internet is great, people have dozens of reviews from good users and many professional reviews on various gaming publications. No one should just read a single review and have that be the end-all-be-all. 

    Lobbies make it easier to gather your friends and the go into a game together. It isn't a game-breaker, but the lack of a lobby system is just a silly deal. 
    Avatar image for teran
    Teran

    876

    Forum Posts

    45

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 1

    Edited By Teran
    @EpicSteve: If the online doesn't work, you forgot to mention that in your review.  Your review contradicts my personal experience with the game and you have under rated the game so significantly it is difficult to take your opinion seriously.  Why you would prefer sitting around in a lobby waiting I will never understand, it must be a console gamer thing.

    If you are not going to be honest in your reviews, I hope no one factors your opinion when deciding whether to purchase or not.
    Avatar image for epicsteve
    EpicSteve

    6908

    Forum Posts

    13016

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 89

    User Lists: 11

    Edited By EpicSteve
    @Teran: Other games such as Bad Company 2 do fine without bots. There's no excuse to just not have a lobby system, and wait for it to fill with player like normal games. I would have given the game a 2/5 if the online worked. Brink could have been the greatest game of all time, but if it doesn't work, I can't recommend anyone buy it. 
    Avatar image for deactivated-5ad2b9eed0cdd
    deactivated-5ad2b9eed0cdd

    418

    Forum Posts

    1761

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 10

    Agree with all of the points you've brought up.  I wanted to enjoy it but it's too much of a mess to care about.

    Avatar image for kyreo
    Kyreo

    4680

    Forum Posts

    5544

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 9

    Edited By Kyreo

    Glad to see you feel the same way I do.  Also, great review.

    Other reviews for Brink (Xbox 360)

      A fine multiplayer shooter, and nothing more. 0

      Some might feel that defining a game by its genre is a completely unfair way to classify a game. For example, is referring to Deadly Premonition as a third-person survival horror game fair when Silent Hill: Shattered Memories would probably be described the same way? Many games strive to expand the meaning of their genre, or go forward and defy genre definition.So with this in mind, I can only define Brink as a multiplayer-focused objective-based first person shooter. Brink fails to differentiat...

      21 out of 24 found this review helpful.

      All the waiting for this? 0

      The Ark. No Covenant. I have been waiting, holding my breath in anticipation of Brink for as long as I can remember. Once upon a time, I jested at the idea of mixing Battlefield with Mirror's Edge. I thought 'Well, that will never happen, nobody could possibly ever make that game.' Then came Brink, a class-based, first person shooter that boasted an interesting creative direction, a fairly intriguing universe and, above all, parkour. I was sold. The trailers revealed a game that looked like a po...

      2 out of 2 found this review helpful.

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.