A small honest review if anyone is interested.

  • 95 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for papuccino1
#1 Edited by papuccino1 (355 posts) -

I've had this game for the past two days, yay Bolivian black market! Unfortunately the game is pretty mediocre.

I can't really put my finder on it but this game lacks heart. There is no story! You get a lot of fast camera cuts and fucking numbers popping up everywhere during flashbacks. The games cutscenes just feels very fast paced without reasons.

You have your typical CoD hollywood type scenes like riding a motorcycle and escaping a Russian POW Camp, or defending a huge onslaught of vietnamese soldiers in Khe Sang. But like I said you don't know why you're doing these things.

The framerates are spectacular as the previous game. Solid 60fps ALWAYS. No gripes there. The character models look even better than before. 

 The guns 'feel' light. I guess this is for most CoD games, but I prefer it when bullets are heavy. One hit or two and the enemies are down, and likewise for yourself. Like FEAR. But hey, not every gamer has the same tastes on this particular area. Your weapons in this game almost always start out with 900 bullets, giving you quite the message to just spray and pray. :/

All in all I'd recommend a rental at best and then judge the game for yourself.

tl;dr: Very good technical accomplishments, but lacks heart of previous games. 

 
EDIT: 
 
Pictures I took of the game can be found here:  http://imgur.com/a/7DA7Y/oepne_source_hur_dur 

   
   
EDIT 3: 
 
Here's the video: 
 
  
Avatar image for fireprince
#2 Posted by FirePrince (1793 posts) -

MW2 didn't have heart.

It had more explosions than a Michael Bay movie.

Avatar image for jim_dandy
#4 Posted by jim_dandy (885 posts) -

How many units of heart does it not have?
 
Like, 30 liters?

Avatar image for somejerk
#5 Edited by SomeJerk (4077 posts) -

60fps solid and you're on a 360 with it? What the f?  The bullets thing and the resupplying in MoH makes me think the focus group tests have moved down a generation in player ages, we're heading towards infinite ammo and eternal hand-holding.
 
 
edit: I confused this with a poorly done PC port, nevermind my fps comment, the game runs just over 50 on 360 etc :D

Avatar image for pessh
#6 Posted by Pessh (2510 posts) -

Heart? Pretty sure people play for the multiplayer...

Avatar image for shivermetimbers
#7 Posted by shivermetimbers (1306 posts) -

It's about Black Ops during the Cold War/Vietnam war era, it doesn't need heart. They add in those action segments because they have to do it to give variety and make things fun.

Avatar image for djeffers03
#8 Posted by Djeffers03 (2537 posts) -
@FirePrince said:
"

MW2 didn't have heart.

It had more explosions than a Michael Bay movie.

"
Has any CoD game had heart? Don't say CoD 4 because im pretty sure that had even less emotional moments.
Avatar image for fireprince
#9 Posted by FirePrince (1793 posts) -
@Djeffers03 said:
" @FirePrince said:
"

MW2 didn't have heart.

It had more explosions than a Michael Bay movie.

"
Has any CoD game had heart? Don't say CoD 4 because im pretty sure that had even less emotional moments. "

I really liked CoD2.It may be just me,but that game was great.Destroying that building in the Russian campaign will be forever in my mind.
Avatar image for meltac
#10 Posted by Meltac (2008 posts) -
@Djeffers03 said:
" @FirePrince said:
"

MW2 didn't have heart.

It had more explosions than a Michael Bay movie.

"
Has any CoD game had heart? Don't say CoD 4 because im pretty sure that had even less emotional moments. "
No man, you don't get it man! CoD4 had tons of heart, it was an emotional rollercoaster, dude! Don't you remember?! Price gave you his gun just before he died, or atleast we thought so, GAVE YOU HIS GUN! That's some shit that makes you cry! and dude, I'm a grown man, and that game made me fucking cry! CoD4 was the shit! man
Avatar image for papuccino1
#11 Posted by papuccino1 (355 posts) -

I frankly haven't tried multiplayer because I couldn't care less about it. Too many perks and combos and shit you don't need. Just a gun and a sight and that's all should be given.

Avatar image for djeffers03
#12 Posted by Djeffers03 (2537 posts) -
@papuccino1 said:
" I frankly haven't tried multiplayer because I couldn't care less about it. Too many perks and combos and shit you don't need. Just a gun and a sight and that's all should be given. "
Then this little review is only usefully to about 2 people...
Avatar image for shockd
#13 Posted by ShockD (2487 posts) -

Thanks for the information.

Avatar image for wickedsc3
#14 Posted by wickedsc3 (1043 posts) -

There's a game mode called barebones that has no killstreaks or perks.@papuccino1 said:

" I frankly haven't tried multiplayer because I couldn't care less about it. Too many perks and combos and shit you don't need. Just a gun and a sight and that's all should be given. "
Avatar image for sander
#15 Posted by Sander (425 posts) -
@papuccino1 said:
"

I've had this game for the past two days, yay Bolivian black market! Unfortunately the game is pretty mediocre.

I can't really put my finder on it but this game lacks heart. There is no story! You get a lot of fast camera cuts and fucking numbers popping up everywhere during flashbacks. The games cutscenes just feels very fast paced without reasons.

You have your typical CoD hollywood type scenes like riding a motorcycle and escaping a Russian POW Camp, or defending a huge onslaught of vietnamese soldiers in Khe Sang. But like I said you don't know why you're doing these things."


There is a story, you missed it. I knew exactly why we were in Cuba, then Soviet Union, then Vietnam and all the rest. Everything is there for a good reason, including numbers popping up and fast camera cuts.
One thing that people should do is turn on the subtitles because hearing the muffled voice of the interrogator is hard and you'll miss things.
Avatar image for yummylee
#16 Posted by Yummylee (24646 posts) -

Is the SP as short as the Modern Warfare games?

Avatar image for zombie2011
#17 Posted by zombie2011 (5490 posts) -

I loved MW2, but this game just doesn't appeal to me for some reason. I'll still get it though, i don't know why but i will. 
 
It's a shame Treyarch are cranking these out, kinda wish they would do their own thing. Let IW make COD, the only reason i play the games are because of single player, and without Price and Soap i don't care about this game.

Avatar image for floodiastus
#18 Posted by floodiastus (1288 posts) -
@papuccino1 said:
" I frankly haven't tried multiplayer because I couldn't care less about it. Too many perks and combos and shit you don't need. Just a gun and a sight and that's all should be given. "
haha you are trolling 
Avatar image for chango
#19 Posted by Chango (867 posts) -

If it's better than the clusterfuck that is mw2 then I'll probably get it.

Avatar image for papuccino1
#20 Posted by papuccino1 (355 posts) -
@floodiastus: What gives you that idea? This is just my opinion of the whole multiplayer scene. Full of 13 year olds that rely on perks and other shit to win.
Avatar image for jerichoblyth
#21 Posted by JerichoBlyth (1039 posts) -
@papuccino1 said:
" @floodiastus: What gives you that idea? This is just my opinion of the whole multiplayer scene. Full of 13 year olds that rely on perks and other shit to win. "
I don't often say this but....agreed.
 
COD multiplayer has become worse and worse every year since it peaked as it started to get good with COD4.
Avatar image for august
#22 Posted by august (4031 posts) -

I watched a steam of the campaign and didn't have any trouble following the story. I thought it was pretty fun in a crazy way.

Avatar image for black100
#23 Posted by black100 (10 posts) -

Just out of curiosity, how did you manage to get a copy?     
 
In my understanding this game can only be played thorugh steam so even if you got a copy early you would have to wait until launch day to actually play it?  Am I mistaken about that or have you used another method. 
 
I don't want to sound like I'm trying to discredit you, I am genuinely interested.
Avatar image for bucketdeth
#24 Posted by Bucketdeth (8252 posts) -
@black100 said:
" Just out of curiosity, how did you manage to get a copy?      In my understanding this game can only be played thorugh steam so even if you got a copy early you would have to wait until launch day to actually play it?  Am I mistaken about that or have you used another method.  I don't want to sound like I'm trying to discredit you, I am genuinely interested. "
He said he got it in the Bolivian black market.
Avatar image for alternate
#25 Posted by alternate (2819 posts) -
@Abyssfull said:
" Is the SP as short as the Modern Warfare games? "
I hear 7-8 hours, which is a touch longer than MW2.  WAW was about that.
Avatar image for jayzilla
#26 Edited by Jayzilla (2695 posts) -
@papuccino1 said:

" I frankly haven't tried multiplayer because I couldn't care less about it. Too many perks and combos and shit you don't need. Just a gun and a sight and that's all should be given. "

^totally. i have had 5 games with the perk/reward/medal system etc. we are in the dead horse phase and need something new because we all have OCD/ADD.
Avatar image for spaceturtle
#27 Posted by spaceturtle (1660 posts) -

There hasn't really been any good story in any of the previous Call of Duty games, nor any other military shooter I'VE played, so I never expected any better from this game. But I do look forward to the explosive action in singleplayer and hopefully the multiplayer will be awesome once again on PC like with the first Modern Warfare.

Avatar image for fluxwavez
#28 Posted by FluxWaveZ (19836 posts) -
@black100: A ton of people have been getting early copies by different methods.  Either by a retailer screwing up, someone being a friend of a store associate who's willing to get them a copy, either by some online store sending a copy late.  This has been happening very frequently for the Xbox 360 and PS3 and people are playing legit copies already.  This always happens for a significant release game.  There's no way around it.  As for Steam, I don't think anyone is able to play it as, like you said, they block everybody from playing it until release day. 
 
papuccino1, I know it's just your opinion, and sorry if this is too blunt, but you sound a little too clueless for me to actually consider your thoughts.  I believe Sander who says that you just missed it.  You sound like the people who got confused as to why you were going to different places in CoD4 or MW2 and didn't even realize that different characters were being played throughout the game.  Generally, from what I've heard, the story is pretty great and considering that David S. Goyer (the writer of Batman Begins and The Dark Knight) is the writer for Black Ops, I'll believe that the story is much more impactful than how you described it until I play it myself.  And saying the game "lacks heart" is so vague and corny that it's almost silly.  This isn't supposed to be some emotional or psychological thriller, it's supposed to be akin to an action movie. 
 
And your ignorant dismissal of the multiplayer with the reasoning " Just a gun and a sight and that's all should be given." when those specific modes are in the game (barebones modes, as someone mentioned) doesn't make for an all too "honest" review.
Avatar image for withateethuh
#29 Posted by withateethuh (766 posts) -
@somejerk said:
" 60fps solid and you're on a 360 with it? What the f?  The bullets thing and the resupplying in MoH makes me think the focus group tests have moved down a generation in player ages, we're heading towards infinite ammo and eternal hand-holding. "
60fps has been the norm with CoD games on the consoles since MW1.
Avatar image for papuccino1
#30 Posted by papuccino1 (355 posts) -
@FluxWaveZ: I'm reviewing singleplayer, not multiplayer, champ.
Avatar image for sander
#31 Posted by Sander (425 posts) -

Yeah well, perks, leveling and customization is what made Call of Duty into the billion dollar franchise it is. True not all people can handle all the different variables, tactics and split second decision making that's required, but for those that can, have a great time. 
 
If you don't like/can't handle what COD gives you, then there are many other FPS games out there. Complaining about perks etc really makes you look stupid, it's like going into playing Halo and complaining you can't aim down the sight.

Avatar image for fluxwavez
#32 Edited by FluxWaveZ (19836 posts) -
@papuccino1 said:

" @FluxWaveZ: I'm reviewing singleplayer, not multiplayer, champ. "

You still gave your reasoning as to why you didn't want to play multiplayer without actually knowing what it consisted of.  It doesn't matter if your initial post was about the single player, your response regarding the multiplayer is absolutely stupid and shouldn't have been made if you didn't know what you were talking about, unless you wanted to actually seem dishonest.  And I've already commented on your "review" on the single player, mainly revolving on the story aspect.
Avatar image for mattymattmatt
#33 Posted by mattymattmatt (70 posts) -

Thank you for your comments.  I'm looking forward to seeing what people will be saying about the game in reviews as I don't think it is going to do as well as people are saying it will.  Sure, this game is going to sell boat-loads coming off the success of MW2, but as I have stated in another thread, I feel like there is just too much CoD out there right now and I'm not ready for the same thing all over again with just different skins and fonts.  And by the way your comments read, it doesn't sound like I'm too far off based.  I agree with your assessment in saying it's probably just a rental and then see. 
 
Just to mention about multiplayer as well, I've seen a couple live streams of it on Justin.tv, and my comments would probably be pretty much the same as MW2, but you can certainly tell the difference with the killstreak changes.  There were numerous rounds where I watched, literally, no killstreaks were happening except for the occasional UAV or RC C4.  No gunships, no blackhawks, nothing higher than the 4 or 5 killstreaks.  I'm thinking that that small change could be the difference between success or failure in the multiplayer portion. You can finally go around the map without the fear of running into a harrier, then a pavelow, then chopper gunner.  Who knows though.  At this point, I feel like the developers could put a piece of crap in the players hands and put CoD on it and it will sell anyway.

Avatar image for mikemcn
#34 Posted by Mikemcn (8139 posts) -
@FirePrince
@Djeffers03 said:
" @FirePrince said:
"

MW2 didn't have heart.

It had more explosions than a Michael Bay movie.

"
Has any CoD game had heart? Don't say CoD 4 because im pretty sure that had even less emotional moments. "

I really liked CoD2.It may be just me,but that game was great.Destroying that building in the Russian campaign will be forever in my mind.
COD 2 is by far the best call of duty game, it had such an intense and memorable campaign. it was the closest thing to saving private ryan: the game.
Avatar image for papuccino1
#35 Posted by papuccino1 (355 posts) -
@mattymattmatt: Yes it's true that they could wrap a turd and put a CoD name on it, and it would sell. 
 
For the people saying that 'the story is fine', mind you that I followed Inception easily, Memento and even Primer for the most part. This story is nonexistant! It's just random 'muricans (but that's fun!) going around exotic locations blowing shit up. Then they loosely tie things together at the end. Definitely needs more work there.
Avatar image for black100
#36 Posted by black100 (10 posts) -
@FluxWaveZ said:
" @black100: A ton of people have been getting early copies by different methods.  Either by a retailer screwing up, someone being a friend of a store associate who's willing to get them a copy, either by some online store sending a copy late.  This has been happening very frequently for the Xbox 360 and PS3 and people are playing legit copies already.  This always happens for a significant release game.  There's no way around it.  As for Steam, I don't think anyone is able to play it as, like you said, they block everybody from playing it until release day.  "

UIhhh Duurrrrr.  Lol I guess I'm just a little too much of a PC gamer haha.  Forgot completely about the 360 and PS3 version.  I was raised on COD for PC and I guess I've just zoned in on the PC version for black ops.  
 
Thanks
Avatar image for invadernick
#37 Posted by invadernick (282 posts) -

well the game is pretty heavy on the multiplayer, and I know I will be spending muuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuch more time with it than SP. BTW screen shots?

Avatar image for papuccino1
#38 Posted by papuccino1 (355 posts) -

I'll try to take some in a bit, but rest assured the framerates (at least on the 360) are superb. Constant 60 fps almost everywhere.

Avatar image for the_tolman
#39 Posted by The_Tolman (460 posts) -
@papuccino1 said:
" @floodiastus: What gives you that idea? This is just my opinion of the whole multiplayer scene. Full of 13 year olds that rely on perks and other shit to win. "
No Caption Provided
Avatar image for jnerd
#40 Posted by jNerd (2193 posts) -

Thanks for the honest review man, I'll definitely rent Black Ops on Gamefly, but I definitely won't be purchasing it.

Avatar image for papuccino1
#41 Posted by papuccino1 (355 posts) -
Avatar image for skytylz
#42 Posted by Skytylz (4131 posts) -
@papuccino1: Hows the multiplayer I couldn't care less about the single player.   I always like a little COD Multiplayer at this time every year.
Avatar image for papuccino1
#43 Posted by papuccino1 (355 posts) -
@Skytylz: Haven't played it online so can't say. I never play multiplayer online.
Avatar image for joyfullofrockets
#44 Posted by JoyfullOFrockets (1206 posts) -
@papuccino1 said:
" @Skytylz: Haven't played it online so can't say. I never play multiplayer online. "
Then I have no idea why you like Call of Duty.
 
Anyway, can you say anything about the zombie mode?
Avatar image for ragingforces
#45 Posted by RagingForces (4 posts) -

I would think most are planning on purchasing this for the MP. I know I am, though I do expect good things from the SP. Based on your thoughts I would say i'm even more interested to check it out. :)

Avatar image for canucks23
#46 Posted by canucks23 (1080 posts) -

What kind of copy of the game is that...?

Avatar image for hansolol
#47 Posted by hansolol (712 posts) -
@papuccino1 said:

I never play multiplayer online. "

I had guessed this from the start.  This makes a lot more sense than
 

" Too many perks and combos and shit you don't need. Just a gun and a sight and that's all should be given. "

Avatar image for meltac
#48 Posted by Meltac (2008 posts) -
@Mikemcn said: 
COD 2 is by far the best call of duty game, it had such an intense and memorable campaign. it was the closest thing to saving private ryan: the game. "
Imo the Band of Brothers series is still the best WW2 games, both when it comes to story and gameplay. 
Avatar image for drpockets000
#49 Posted by DrPockets000 (2877 posts) -

I want a deep, emotional story with heart in MY Call of Duty. 
 
*cancels pre-order 
 
Just joking, duder.  Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

Avatar image for fluxwavez
#50 Posted by FluxWaveZ (19836 posts) -
@canucks23 said:
" What kind of copy of the game is that...? "
Yeah... I know some people have actually been getting legit copies but that one's obviously illegal.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.