Call of Duty
Originally starting as a World War II-themed first-person shooter, the Call of Duty franchise now incorporates other time periods and conflicts and can be found on virtually every modern platform.
Man Kills Friend Over Call Of Duty Argument
Not true.
The actually article states they were playing COD when the arguement occured, nothing more.
Anyway, it baffles me. How can you be good enough friends to play with someone yet then go shoot them? Weird.
Omfg... Well I'm glad that he isn't my friend."
hahahaha, anyways, this is from the article
More fuel for the videogames = criminals argument.
There are so many other causes for violence but videogames always get listed when it is suspected
I have people come into my store asking for handles all the time. It took me awhile to figure out they were referring to controllers.
" If the victim was holding cake would the headline bethatMan Kills Friend Over Cake Argument
"
" He was just proving to his friend that a single rifle round to the chest would, in fact, kill you. "Haha
What's sad is that I remember reading another story just like this a few months back. Two friends were playing some shooter, and it ended with one of them getting shot in the head. Why does this happen?
Wait wtf... This is the second time this has happened. Wasn't a very similar event reported just a few months back, with two soldiers playing xbox in their barracks, following an argument one of them shot the other in the head with his sidearm.
Once, fucked up, but twice WTF IS GOING ON?!?!
" If the victim was holding cake would the headline beOh come on now, seriously? I know we all love our chosen form of entertainment but don't let that blind you to cops and detectives doing their fucking job, using the evidence displayed at the scene of the crime to come to some sort of explanation as to what happened. If a dude dies on the street with a wallet in his hand, it only makes sense to assume the death was money related, if theirs crack sprinkled on his lips (props to whoever gets that reference) we have to assume its drug related. If the two were at home, sitting in front of a tv, playin xbox the most logical assumption is that some argument ensued concerning the game. There are plenty of examples of gamer rage out there in our own personal lives. Don't act all shocked and bewildered that an argument over games could lead to physical complications.Man Kills Friend Over Cake Argument
"
"Oh come on now, seriously? I know we all love our chosen form of entertainment but don't let that blind you to cops and detectives doing their fucking job, using the evidence displayed at the scene of the crime to come to some sort of explanation as to what happened. If a dude dies on the street with a wallet in his hand, it only makes sense to assume the death was money related, if theirs crack sprinkled on his lips (props to whoever gets that reference) we have to assume its drug related. If the two were at home, sitting in front of a tv, playin xbox the most logical assumption is that some argument ensued concerning the game. There are plenty of examples of gamer rage out there in our own personal lives. Don't act all shocked and bewildered that an argument over games could lead to physical complications. "Chappelle FTW. "Doesn't it seem a little suspicious... that every dead black guy the cops find has crack sprinkled on them? Who gets shot and sprinkles crack on themselves?"
Good point though. It's not a stretch to say that game rage caused a crime. That doesn't mean that games cause violence though, it just means that crazy motherf*ckers cause violence when they get angry enough over something.
" That is pretty fucked up. I wonder what the arugement was about. This is why we need more gun control in this country. "More people are killed by cars, you want to take them away too?
" @Wolverine said:Thing is, cars are designed for tranportation, and do a lot more good than guns do. Guns are designed to hurt people - they don't have any other purposes." That is pretty fucked up. I wonder what the arugement was about. This is why we need more gun control in this country. "More people are killed by cars, you want to take them away too? "
" @Alex_Murphy said:And getting rid of Hitler is a bad idea? Taking the lives of others can be a good thing you know." @Wolverine said:Thing is, cars are designed for tranportation, and do a lot more good than guns do. Guns are designed to hurt people - they don't have any other purposes. "" That is pretty fucked up. I wonder what the arugement was about. This is why we need more gun control in this country. "More people are killed by cars, you want to take them away too? "
Also, this looks fake.
FUCK, people are stupid. Who does that?? Over COD? I feel bad for the guy's family, that's just tragic.
" @Wolverine said:I'm sorry, that was a really dumb and flawed response. Both sides of the argument have valid points but relating guns to cars is a weak tactic. The statistic that matters is purposeful deaths/injuries from guns against purposeful death/injuries from cars. Don't bend a fact to fit the mold you prefer, its why arguments like this never get far in the public eye." That is pretty fucked up. I wonder what the arugement was about. This is why we need more gun control in this country. "More people are killed by cars, you want to take them away too? "
" @Alex_Murphy said:Guns aren't designed to hurt people. Guns are designed to move small pieces of metal at supersonic speeds, what you do with it is up to you. I will say that guns are a very good tool to hurt people because you don't have to be right next to them to do it. Saying that guns don't serve any purpose other than to hurt people is a ludicris argument. Plenty of people have guns for hunting, target practice, or they just like to collect them as a hobby. As far as what helps people more, cars or guns, I'd have to say guns by far. Cars are a convince, but how many people would really say that their lives had been saved by a car, versus people who's lives were saved by a gun? The country I live in wouldn't exist, and I wouldn't have the freedom's I have, if it weren't for guns. A 110 pound woman is never going to be a match for a 200 pound man. The police don't have a one second response time. Everybody should have the right to defend themselves from anybody that would threaten them, including the government." @Wolverine said:Thing is, cars are designed for tranportation, and do a lot more good than guns do. Guns are designed to hurt people - they don't have any other purposes. "" That is pretty fucked up. I wonder what the arugement was about. This is why we need more gun control in this country. "More people are killed by cars, you want to take them away too? "
"Guns aren't designed to hurt people. Guns are designed to move small pieces of metal at supersonic speeds, what you do with it is up to you. I will say that guns are a very good tool to hurt people because you don't have to be right next to them to do it. Saying that guns don't serve any purpose other than to hurt people is a ludicris argument. Plenty of people have guns for hunting, target practice, or they just like to collect them as a hobby. "You must know you're fighting a losing argument. Or you really are that dense. A gun is a weapon. Weapons are made for killing, end of story. Any other use of a gun is secondary to its inherent purpose, no matter what the reason. If you want to argue in favor of gun rights thats your perogative but please don't base your argument on such ridiculous leaps of logic.
" @Alex_Murphy said:I don't think it's a flawed response at all. When you say "The statistic that matters is purposeful deaths/injuries" you're setting up a straw man argument. Why is that the statistic that matters? Because you say it is? You're misrepresenting my position to make it easier for you to prove your point. What I was saying was that yes, bad things are going to happen. People are going to get killed. This world isn't made out of pillows and rubber where nobody gets hurt. But just because some people are going to get hurt in no way justifies EVERYBODY loosing their rights. Taking away people's freedom, even if it saves lives, is just not right. That's why banning violent video games is bullshit, that's why the war on drugs is bullshit, and that's why gun control is bullshit." @Wolverine said:I'm sorry, that was a really dumb and flawed response. Both sides of the argument have valid points but relating guns to cars is a weak tactic. The statistic that matters is purposeful deaths/injuries from guns against purposeful death/injuries from cars. Don't bend a fact to fit the mold you prefer, its why arguments like this never get far in the public eye. "" That is pretty fucked up. I wonder what the arugement was about. This is why we need more gun control in this country. "More people are killed by cars, you want to take them away too? "
" @Alex_Murphy said:Negative. I feel confidant I can defend my position :)"Guns aren't designed to hurt people. Guns are designed to move small pieces of metal at supersonic speeds, what you do with it is up to you. I will say that guns are a very good tool to hurt people because you don't have to be right next to them to do it. Saying that guns don't serve any purpose other than to hurt people is a ludicris argument. Plenty of people have guns for hunting, target practice, or they just like to collect them as a hobby. "You must know you're fighting a losing argument. Or you really are that dense. A gun is a weapon. Weapons are made for killing, end of story. Any other use of a gun is secondary to its inherent purpose, no matter what the reason. If you want to argue in favor of gun rights thats your perogative but please don't base your argument on such ridiculous leaps of logic. "
A weapon is defined as ' something used to injure, defeat, or destroy ' so Anything can be a weapon. If I stab someone in the neck with a pencil, that's a weapon. If I put a padlock in a sock and hit somebody in the head, that's a weapon. If I smother somebody with a pillow, that's a weapon. If anything can be a weapon then your statement "Weapons are made for killing, end of story." is false. You'll probaly argue that guns are hardly used for anything other than hurting people. But if you do, you'll be wrong. Most people who own a gun don't ever shoot anybody with it. The ATF says that there are 4.37 milion guns produced in the US every year, but only 20,695 people were killed with a gun that same year (1995, most recent stats I could find). So most people who own guns are not using them as weapons. If you decide you want to kill somebody, a gun might be the best tool for the job. But if you look at the stats, that's not how most of them are being used.
" @Nasar7 said:That definition is incomplete. The full definition is, according to the Oxford American dictionary, 'a thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage." The key word here being designed. Yes, you can kill someone by smothering them with a pillow, and then the police might call the pillow the murder weapon, but since pillows are not designed for this purpose, they are not commonly labeled as weapons in general. Obviously, anything can be used as a weapon, but that doesn't mean they are inherently weapons." @Alex_Murphy said:Negative. I feel confidant I can defend my position :)"Guns aren't designed to hurt people. Guns are designed to move small pieces of metal at supersonic speeds, what you do with it is up to you. I will say that guns are a very good tool to hurt people because you don't have to be right next to them to do it. Saying that guns don't serve any purpose other than to hurt people is a ludicris argument. Plenty of people have guns for hunting, target practice, or they just like to collect them as a hobby. "You must know you're fighting a losing argument. Or you really are that dense. A gun is a weapon. Weapons are made for killing, end of story. Any other use of a gun is secondary to its inherent purpose, no matter what the reason. If you want to argue in favor of gun rights thats your perogative but please don't base your argument on such ridiculous leaps of logic. "
A weapon is defined as ' something used to injure, defeat, or destroy ' so Anything can be a weapon. If I stab someone in the neck with a pencil, that's a weapon. If I put a padlock in a sock and hit somebody in the head, that's a weapon. If I smother somebody with a pillow, that's a weapon. If anything can be a weapon then your statement "Weapons are made for killing, end of story." is false. You'll probaly argue that guns are hardly used for anything other than hurting people. But if you do, you'll be wrong. Most people who own a gun don't ever shoot anybody with it. The ATF says that there are 4.37 milion guns produced in the US every year, but only 20,695 people were killed with a gun that same year (1995, most recent stats I could find). So most people who own guns are not using them as weapons. If you decide you want to kill somebody, a gun might be the best tool for the job. But if you look at the stats, that's not how most of them are being used.
"
" @Illmatic said:Its the statistic that matters because we're trying to figure out how dangerous these guns actually are in the wrong hands. I'm in no way in favor of banning guns. I believe they are important in self-defense and in the hands of police who are meant to protect but at the same time I am not going to say something is more dangerous simply because it kills more people on average. The reasons behind the numbers are important too which is why I said stating the exact statistic that is being compared is important. One bullet will usually only harm one person while one car can harm the people inside and those who are hit during the path of whatever crash we are considering. Of course the numbers are going to be widely in the direction of cars in terms of sheer numbers. The reasons behind the deaths will give us a better understanding of each "weapon" and their dangers though. We are constantly making measures to make cars safer with computerized mechanisms that slow down cars, ways to keep the driver awake, seat belts, air bags on various sides of the car, classes required, and licenses required. For guns we have the need for a license and a safety. Why not be pro-regulation in making guns safer and harder to obtain for situations like these? I don't want to ban them, but more protocols concerning them has the ability to do more harm than good." @Alex_Murphy said:I don't think it's a flawed response at all. When you say "The statistic that matters is purposeful deaths/injuries" you're setting up a straw man argument. Why is that the statistic that matters? Because you say it is? You're misrepresenting my position to make it easier for you to prove your point. What I was saying was that yes, bad things are going to happen. People are going to get killed. This world isn't made out of pillows and rubber where nobody gets hurt. But just because some people are going to get hurt in no way justifies EVERYBODY loosing their rights. Taking away people's freedom, even if it saves lives, is just not right. That's why banning violent video games is bullshit, that's why the war on drugs is bullshit, and that's why gun control is bullshit. "" @Wolverine said:I'm sorry, that was a really dumb and flawed response. Both sides of the argument have valid points but relating guns to cars is a weak tactic. The statistic that matters is purposeful deaths/injuries from guns against purposeful death/injuries from cars. Don't bend a fact to fit the mold you prefer, its why arguments like this never get far in the public eye. "" That is pretty fucked up. I wonder what the arugement was about. This is why we need more gun control in this country. "More people are killed by cars, you want to take them away too? "
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment