His review of CoJ:BiB was way too negative. I really loved this game and fully believe this is better than fucking wolfenstein.

Yep. 
 
Your OPINION is correct
 
Jeff's OPINION is wrong.

Yeah, after reading your post everything starts to make sense to me.
 
Edit:
Aww... you edited your post :/ Oh well, "sdfsdf" made as much sense as your new post.

K thx

haven't tried wolfenstein yet, but with my experience with COJ: BIB Jeff seemed spot on. 
 
I dont agree with everything though, majoras mask is still an awesome game.

Learn how to elaborate.  How did you feel he was off the mark?

Played the demo, and hated it. But thats my opinion.

I thought his review was accurate, though I think I enjoyed the game more than he did.

Oh no! Now Jeff will be fired :(

I only tried the demo, and it seems like a fun western rental. I imagine the online is intolerably slow. I love the cover system, though.

I really liked the game, 3/5 sounds low though, I'd give it a thumbs up 4/5.

" I only tried the demo, and it seems like a fun western rental. I imagine the online is intolerably slow. I love the cover system, though. "

" Yep.   Your OPINION is correct  Jeff's OPINION is wrong. "

It's a good thing they didn't take that Call of Juarez advertising package for the site.  Otherwise, this could be a rather hairy situation! 

Cover system was below average and Jeff was right, it was an average shooter, you should learn to elaborate on your thoughts otherwise you come off as a moron who doesn't deserve to be listened to

Opinion =/= Fact

" I only tried the demo, and it seems like a fun western rental. I imagine the online is intolerably slow. I love the cover system, though. "

It's an opinion. Do you want reviews to come with a disclaimer at the bottom saying: "The views and opinions expressed here might not match those of the reader"? Come on...

The problem with Call of Juarez is that it's really hard to review - the start is crap, the "tutorial", corn-hiding and shooting horseback feels awkward and like it's straight from a budget game. After that, the game kicks into the right trail and it's almost pure win, but some ideas feel a bit underdeveloped.

Besides, only Nemesis cares about stars. It's all about the reviews here - there are plenty of games when in the review you can feel so much entusiasm mixed with a bit of disappointment which can't be reflected in stars.

" Opinion =/= Fact "

I bought it and enjoyed it all of the way through,there were even some moments that made me lol,I never tried the multiplayer,but I beat the single player game.I don't review games so I don't know how many "stars" it should have gotten,but I really liked it so.....

Having played through the game myself I did enjoy it, especially considering I'm not keen on that time in history. But it was a very solid game, if a little rough around the edge.

" Oh no! Now Jeff will be fired :( "

He reviewed Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood? 
Well, whaddaya know? He did! Shows what I know. The game was so not on my radar.
 
 
 
Also, opinion.

"It's a good thing they didn't take that Call of Juarez advertising package for the site.  Otherwise, this could be a rather hairy situation!  "

I thought it was "if you don't agree with what I say your wrong" isn't that how it works?

" His review of CoJ:BiB was way too negative. I really loved this game and fully believe this is better than fucking wolfenstein. "

Did you read Jeff's review of it? It was very positive. Sure, he pointed out it's flaws, but he was largely positive about the game, and gave it a decent score. And at the end of the day, it's just an opinion. You can't expect Jeff's taste in games to line up perfectly with yours.

Opinions are opinions.

What about 3 stars is bad? You fucking tool...

" @JJOR64: Like asshole everyone has one! But sadly sometimes people are them, assholes I mean! "

This is GB. Most people here don't like people bitching about review scores. I'm one of them.

Why do people take review scores so personally?  Jeff's review is his opinion of the game, that is why you must take every reviewer's review with a grain of salt

Who gives a flying fuck about 'scores' given to games. Read the review and talking about the points he raised in it. If you're going to argue about review scores go to Gamespot and whine why a game 'was given a 9.1 when it clearly is a 9.6+, reviewer biased to give such low score???'.

The dude's not commented since he made that post, I think he's realised what he said now.
And how it's Jeff's opin.....ah feck it sure he knows.

You should have taken the time to think about this and instead said, "I do not agree with Jeff's review," rather than coming out and saying "it's off the mark." Sorry you're butt-hurt, but that's your own fault for being unable to enjoy games and leaving it at that, not Jeff's, for giving his more informed opinion on a game.
 
For instance, I enjoy the Dynasty Warriors series, even though it consistently receives scores that indicate it's rather low quality. Do I usually agree with these reviews? Yes! But it doesn't stop me from still finding my own enjoyment out of the game.

This thread exists in every game Jeff has reviewed.

" It's an opinion. Do you want reviews to come with a disclaimer at the bottom saying: "The views and opinions expressed here might not match those of the reader"? Come on... "

" Oh no! Now Jeff will be fired :( "

Lame joke after lame joke. 

" Lame joke after lame joke.  "

Yes, exactly.

I'm only halfway but so far I give it 4 stars out of 5.  

Congratulations, sir. You just learned what opinions are. Now please learn to cope with them or you won't go far in life.

" This thread exists in every game Jeff has reviewed. "

Looks up the word "opinion" brah

ENOUGH! 
 
The OP has not posted a response and all of these needless posts are ridiculous since you are talking to a wall.