Now, I know a lot of people have been on the fence with this game, including myself, but this review makes me so very happy.
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/119/1192319p1.html
Now I can say I'm very excited for Tuesday.
Dead Island
Game » consists of 24 releases. Released Sep 06, 2011
- PC
- PlayStation 3
- Xbox 360
- Xbox 360 Games Store
- + 3 more
- PlayStation Network (PS3)
- Linux
- PlayStation 4
After a zombie virus sweeps across a beautiful island resort, survivors must fight their way to freedom while trying to find out exactly what went down in this open-world first-person action game.
First Review Is In! (IGN)
Yeah, but it's an IGN review - from what the reviewer says it seems like he hasn't even finished the game yet... =/
Yeah, but it's an IGN review - from what the reviewer says it seems like he hasn't even finished the game yet... =/How so? All he said is that he wants to keep playing. It's an RPG. It probably lets you keep playing after the game, or he still wants to explore everywhere and do side quests he missed.
@BeachThunder said:
Yeah, but it's an IGN review - from what the reviewer says it seems like he hasn't even finished the game yet... =/
He says at the end that he finished it but didn't do all the side quests.
@Mr_Skeleton said:
I don't trust IGN, I will wait for more reviews.
I really wish people would stop hating on IGN for stupid reasons.
Brad for Dead Island, no idea for SM, i wish Vinny (since he's the only one actually into the universe) but its probably Jeff, since it's a "shooter"@Rhaknar said:
I predict 3 stars here. And 3 stars for Space Marine alsoYea that sounds about right, do we know whos reviewing it for GB?
It's not so much that he's regressed, it's just the direction that IGN has taken to "appeal to a wider audience." If you listen to Greg Miller on podcasts and stuff he's actually a pretty cool guy. I see no reason not to trust his opinion.@weeman105 said:
@Mr_Skeleton said:
I don't trust IGN, I will wait for more reviews.
It certainly doesn't help that having read the first paragraph, it sounds like Greg Miller has regressed to eight-year-old mode as he did with that Dead Space 2 review.
Game looks great, hopefully the tech issues seen on the PS3 version won't show up on PC. They shouldn't, since they already said that it's not a PC port and looks/plays even better on PC.
That review was painful to get through at the beginning. Sounded like it was written by an 8 year old. Anyway I don't really trust the guys at IGN as they gave War for Cybertron a high review and about every other day they have a top 10 or 100 list just to get more page views.
@benjaebe said:
@iAmJohn said:It's not so much that he's regressed, it's just the direction that IGN has taken to "appeal to a wider audience."@weeman105 said:
@Mr_Skeleton said:
I don't trust IGN, I will wait for more reviews.
It certainly doesn't help that having read the first paragraph, it sounds like Greg Miller has regressed to eight-year-old mode as he did with that Dead Space 2 review.
Appealing to a wider audience means writing shittily because you have such a low opinion of your audience that you think they won't care at best or it's easier for them to understand at worst? You're really not giving me any reason to ever take anything this site says seriously ever again, you know.
I expected more of a review than that (depth-wise), didn't really learn as much about the game as I wanted to
It just means that they tone they're taking with their writing is more casual and less professional. I don't think it makes their writing "shitty," but I'm not saying I enjoy it personally - give me a review written by Brad or Alex any day since they're both great. Having listened to Greg Miller and much of the IGN staff outside of their reviews though, it's not like they don't know their stuff and they haven't given me a reason not to listen to their opinions.@benjaebe said:
@iAmJohn said:It's not so much that he's regressed, it's just the direction that IGN has taken to "appeal to a wider audience."@weeman105 said:
@Mr_Skeleton said:
I don't trust IGN, I will wait for more reviews.
It certainly doesn't help that having read the first paragraph, it sounds like Greg Miller has regressed to eight-year-old mode as he did with that Dead Space 2 review.
Appealing to a wider audience means writing shittily because you have such a low opinion of your audience that you think they won't care at best or it's easier for them to understand at worst? You're really not giving me any reason to ever take anything this site says seriously ever again, you know.
@benjaebe said:
@iAmJohn said:It just means that they tone they're taking with their writing is more casual and less professional. I don't think it makes their writing "shitty," but I'm not saying I enjoy it personally - give me a review written by Brad or Alex any day since they're both great. Having listened to Greg Miller and much of the IGN staff outside of their reviews though, it's not like they don't know their stuff and they haven't given me a reason not to listen to their opinions.@benjaebe said:
@iAmJohn said:It's not so much that he's regressed, it's just the direction that IGN has taken to "appeal to a wider audience."@weeman105 said:
@Mr_Skeleton said:
I don't trust IGN, I will wait for more reviews.
It certainly doesn't help that having read the first paragraph, it sounds like Greg Miller has regressed to eight-year-old mode as he did with that Dead Space 2 review.
Appealing to a wider audience means writing shittily because you have such a low opinion of your audience that you think they won't care at best or it's easier for them to understand at worst? You're really not giving me any reason to ever take anything this site says seriously ever again, you know.
This. Anyone who listens to the IGN podcasts will know that the IGN editors are all really cool guys and they know what they are talking about. I personally like Greg's style of writing but I understand why some people don't like it.
There's really nothing wrong with the way that review was written. You're just being dicks because it's IGN related, and therefore must be evil.
@CptBedlam said:
Never trust IGN reviews ... especially not if it's an early exclusive. Also, Greg Miller is a joke.
@AhmadMetallic said:
@Vegsen said:@Mr_Skeleton said:
I don't trust IGN, I will wait for more reviews.
Can you guys please give me your reasons why we shouldn't trust IGN? Do you have some secret knowledge about them or something?
@benjaebe said:
@iAmJohn said:It just means that they tone they're taking with their writing is more casual and less professional. I don't think it makes their writing "shitty," but I'm not saying I enjoy it personally - give me a review written by Brad or Alex any day since they're both great. Having listened to Greg Miller and much of the IGN staff outside of their reviews though, it's not like they don't know their stuff and they haven't given me a reason not to listen to their opinions.@benjaebe said:
@iAmJohn said:It's not so much that he's regressed, it's just the direction that IGN has taken to "appeal to a wider audience."@weeman105 said:
@Mr_Skeleton said:
I don't trust IGN, I will wait for more reviews.
It certainly doesn't help that having read the first paragraph, it sounds like Greg Miller has regressed to eight-year-old mode as he did with that Dead Space 2 review.
Appealing to a wider audience means writing shittily because you have such a low opinion of your audience that you think they won't care at best or it's easier for them to understand at worst? You're really not giving me any reason to ever take anything this site says seriously ever again, you know.
Does "appeal to a wider audience" mean raping the English language? His DS2 review was an utter joke ("But I have lots of favorite parts to Dead Space 2"); this one isn't much better.
http://m.ign.com/articles/1145332
@Spoonman671 said:
There's really nothing wrong with the way that review was written. You're just being dicks because it's IGN related, and therefore must be evil.
Read this review by Greg Miller: http://m.ign.com/articles/1145332
There's nothing good about it. Also IGN sucks and sells good scores for early exclusive reviews (no I can't prove it, just my impression after many years of reading reviews).
People hating on a games reviewer because they don't like that he doesn't use a thesaurus to get the longest possible adjective? I understand he's probably not got a university degree in the use of the english language but using that as some sort of leverage in an argument as to why you can't trust his review is dogshit.
@CptBedlam said:
@Spoonman671 said:
There's really nothing wrong with the way that review was written. You're just being dicks because it's IGN related, and therefore must be evil.Read this review by Greg Miller: http://m.ign.com/articles/1145332
There's nothing good about it. Also IGN sucks and sells good scores for early exclusive reviews (no I can't prove it, just my impression after many years of reading reviews).
Again that is just your opinion, just because he doesn't write reviews in a conventional style doesn't mean it's bad. It just comes down to personal preference. And you're right, you can't prove that they sell good scores because they don't, do you think any of the big sites could get away with doing this? They get exclusives because they are one of the biggest gaming sites around so more people will see it.
They killed my fadar@CptBedlam said:
Never trust IGN reviews ... especially not if it's an early exclusive. Also, Greg Miller is a joke.
@AhmadMetallic said:
@Vegsen said:@Mr_Skeleton said:
I don't trust IGN, I will wait for more reviews.
Can you guys please give me your reasons why we shouldn't trust IGN? Do you have some secret knowledge about them or something?
@emergency said:
+1People hating on a games reviewer because they don't like that he doesn't use a thesaurus to get the longest possible adjective? I understand he's probably not got a university degree in the use of the english language but using that as some sort of leverage in an argument as to why you can't trust his review is dogshit.
@Heltom92 said:
@CptBedlam said:
Never trust IGN reviews ... especially not if it's an early exclusive. Also, Greg Miller is a joke.
@AhmadMetallic said:
@Vegsen said:@Mr_Skeleton said:
I don't trust IGN, I will wait for more reviews.
Can you guys please give me your reasons why we shouldn't trust IGN? Do you have some secret knowledge about them or something?
No secret knowledge or anything and I didn't say everyone shouldn't trust them (although it seems I am not the only one) it's just that I personally don't trust them. Why? I think they have way too many reviews I don't agree with and way too many reviews that feel like they were written by a child. Another reason that any website who gets an exclusive early review can't be completely not biased.
@emergency said:
People hating on a games reviewer because they don't like that he doesn't use a thesaurus to get the longest possible adjective? I understand he's probably not got a university degree in the use of the english language but using that as some sort of leverage in an argument as to why you can't trust his review is dogshit.
This dude shouldn't get paid for his low quality work. Period.
I don't expect a thesis approach to game reviews but that Greg guy doesn't even fulfil common standards for writing articles - no matter what audience they want to appeal to.
@Heltom92 said:
@CptBedlam said:
@Spoonman671 said:
There's really nothing wrong with the way that review was written. You're just being dicks because it's IGN related, and therefore must be evil.Read this review by Greg Miller: http://m.ign.com/articles/1145332
There's nothing good about it. Also IGN sucks and sells good scores for early exclusive reviews (no I can't prove it, just my impression after many years of reading reviews).
Again that is just your opinion, just because he doesn't write reviews in a conventional style doesn't mean it's bad. It just comes down to personal preference. And you're right, you can't prove that they sell good scores because they don't, do you think any of the big sites could get away with doing this? They get exclusives because they are one of the biggest gaming sites around so more people will see it.
If "unconventional" means being able to write correct English, then sorry, we have very different standards.
As for the scores: On more than one occasion IGN had exclusive first reviews with scores way above the average. Of course they get away with it - because of naive people like you who still go and read their shit just because they have the first review. It is a common business practice by publishers to demand certain scores for early reviews and IGN gives in to this regularly to get their exclusives.
Example: Ao2: 40th Day... IGN exclusive review: 8.5 ... review embargo over: 6s and 7s are pouring in. There are many examples like this and I have a feeling it will be the same way with Dead Island.
I've just always felt IGN gives great scores to all big games. It has nothing to do with well-written or not well-written reviews. I'm not saying they're "bribed" or get early access and give high scores because of that, it's just how I've always felt about IGN.
But what do I know, maybe this game really is super awesome and deserve that score, but I'd never decide what games to get based on their reviews.
I think the reason why most people don't "trust" IGN is because they are a big site, appeal to a wide audience, have clicktraps and the fact that it's cool to hate the big corporation, bro. They are the opposite Giant Bomb in many ways, which is no reason to distrust the whole site and their reviewers. It would make sense to disagree with one particular reviewer because his opinion differs from your own and not because of his writing, but that's rarely the case with these Giant Bomb IGN haters. My point is, those people suck some huge, nasty dicks.
@CaLe: I couldn't care less about convincing you of anything.
The business practice is real, like it or not, and IGN is one of the places where it blossoms.
@neozeke said:
@CptBedlam: It is completely possible they felt that it was an 8.5 game. Just saying.
I'm not ruling out the possibility but after seeing numerous examples of this on IGN, I prefer to believe otherwise.
In my opinion IGN is too much in bed with publishers.
I'm curious about knowing what about his reviews exactly makes them bad. The statement or implication at least that he writes "bad english" doesn't give me much of an idea, and I'm too lazy now to read through his reviews. I'd welcome any examples as someone who is working on improving my own writing.
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment