Why "spiritual sequel"?

#1 Posted by ryanwho (12082 posts) -

Why didn't they just make a new Baldur's Gate? Id understand if they were doing something unique with the generic high fantasy formula but this is basically Baldur's Gate but without the preconceived history and lure to grab from.

#2 Posted by Pibo47 (3166 posts) -

Bioware nolonger has the rights to the baldurs gate series. Someone else is making BG2. So BW is making DA:O

#3 Posted by lebkin (331 posts) -

Well, Pibo47 isn't exactly right.  I mean, someone else is not making Baldur's Gate 2; Bioware already made it.  But he is correct that Bioware does not have the rights to the Dungeon and Dragon franchises.  In actuality, Bioware never held those rights.  Interplay did when BG 1 and 2 were made (along with Black Isle games like Planescape and Icewind Dale).  Now Atari holds those rights. 

Bioware is currently, with the exception of the Sonic RPG, focused on creating franchises from IP that they control.  Mass Effect and Dragon's Age are both examples of Bioware doing just that.  They want a level of control that they will never have working on other people's projects.

#4 Posted by ryanwho (12082 posts) -

Oh okay. Still, if their concern is "owning" an IP, you'd think they'd aspire for more than their predecessor.  And maybe they do, but I haven't seen it yet. I'm so over orcs as defacto bad guy forces. Though I have a feeling the long haired guy will be(or can be, depending on choices) the main enemy. So maybe they'll throw a few gray hats in the mix but initial impressions were "this is exactly like Baldur's Gate, so why isnt it". I didn't know the IP issue. Atari should definetly NOT make a Baldur's Gate game.

#5 Posted by Jayge_ (10221 posts) -

They are doing things in Dragon Age: Origins that would drastically change the formulas set down in the Baldur's Gate series. They also don't want to go through the mess of licensing, and it's much easier to make a new story. Plus, a new franchise that does well will help cement BioWare's image as the supreme IP developers of the generation, with both Mass Effect and Dragon Age counted on as successes. Not counting anything else they'd develop alongside those, if they did at all.

#6 Posted by lightwarrior179 (383 posts) -

One of the reasons why no new Baldur's Gate game is being made by BioWare is like one of the above users stated is that they don't have rights to it and now BioWare has become a lot more independant after Jade Empire depending upon their own original IP's.

There were rumors that a BGIII might be in plans which will be most likely be made by Obsidian.

Also even if a new BG game is made it won't be a direct sequel to BGII as BGII's plot arc ended in Throne of Bhaal.
#7 Posted by karubah (45 posts) -

Yeah I agree that they should have called it a "spiritual successor" to BG.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.