Previous Titles First?

#1 Edited by Emoney244 (183 posts) -

So should I play Path of Raidiance and Radiant Dawn before Awakening? Would miss some story beats or is it pretty standalone?

#2 Posted by Poonz (163 posts) -

I'm actually really curious about this too as Awakening will be my first Fire Emblem and I'm getting it for Christmas.

#3 Posted by Solidsnak (148 posts) -

might make bonus content more meaningful, but the game is great on it's own.

#4 Posted by afabs515 (1478 posts) -

You definitely don't have to. If you wanna give one of the others a shot, I recommend the first one on the GBA. That's the one with Eliwood, Hector, and Lynn. That was a great game too.

#5 Posted by BisonHero (8564 posts) -

The Fire Emblems generally have mini-arcs that are connected to each other, but overall there isn't really a greater storyline (except a character named Anna weirdly shows up in multiple games, though often only as a tutorial character - don't worry about it).

So like, Path of Radiance and Radiant Dawn are one storyline, and that is unrelated to everything else.

Awakening is a distant, distant sequel to the original Fire Emblem (the one with Marth). The only easy way to play that in English would be to get the DS remake/reimagining thing, Shadow Dragon. For story continuity, that is the only game maybe you could play, but honestly Awakening more or less mentions all the relevant details (catches you up on Marth, ancient dragon nonsense, etc.).

I mean, I think Path of Radiance is a perfectly fine game that is actually a much better first Fire Emblem experience because you can't just grind your team so that they're invincible (this becomes an issue later in Awakening where your team is untouchable). So I encourage you to play it in general. Radiant Dawn I am less jazzed about, though there are noticeable plot threads from Path of Radiance that go unresolved until Radiant Dawn.

The DLC of Awakening relates to past titles, but it honestly works better if you already have nostalgia for the characters from those games, and want to see them interact with the characters of Awakening. I wouldn't recommend going back to play them just to enhance the impact of that DLC or anything.


@arbitrarywater, I summon thee! *blows conch*

#6 Posted by TheManWithNoPlan (6345 posts) -

You'd probably be able to recognize some of the Dlc characters.

#7 Edited by Flappy (2406 posts) -

It's not mandatory to play the previous FE games to enjoy Awakening, but the DLC makes a lot of callbacks to the past games. In fact, now that I think about it, I'd say a significant portion of the DLC is designed to overwhelm long-time fans with nostalgia.

As far as the main story goes, they do a good job of keeping you well-informed about the things that are going on. If you're not familiar with the story, here's a tip for ya: Marth was a pretty influential figure and accomplished a lot in his lifetime. Happy trails!

#8 Edited by Random45 (1440 posts) -

No, don't bother. The games are all stand-alone, with only a few things tying them together.

#9 Posted by ArbitraryWater (12882 posts) -

@arbitrarywater, I summon thee! *blows conch*

And just as bisonhero said the words, I appeared in a puff of smoke.

Fire Emblem games are pretty stand-alone. There are a couple of direct sequels, but you're totally fine playing Awakening as a first game.

#10 Edited by Emoney244 (183 posts) -

Alright cool. I'll definently get it soon. I need a new 3ds game.

#11 Posted by Hunter5024 (6447 posts) -

When you are done I wholeheartedly recommend you play Path of Radiance and then halfheartedly recommend you play Radiant Dawn. Also those GBA games are pretty great too especially the first one (technically second, if you count japan only releases).

#12 Posted by BisonHero (8564 posts) -

@hunter5024: Man, Radiant Dawn is just so fucking weird. Kudos to them for trying something structurally different, but all of the minicampaigns are kinda unsatisfying until the actual ending, and it turns out it sorta sucks to not have a consistent team throughout the whole game. And props for making Micaiah quite different from the usual stoic main character/lord in all the previous games, but I never liked her all that much.

#13 Edited by Hunter5024 (6447 posts) -

@bisonhero: Totally. The annoying part is it seems like they could've very easily fixed all the glaring issues and had a super great game on their hands. If they'd just totally dropped act 2 in favor of fleshing out the dawn brigade a little bit better, and done some difficulty tweaking I think that would've made for a much better experience.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.