flOw Forum

flOw is a video game that consists of 4 releases

flOw as commentary on the stagnation of games?

Topic started by Psytek on Aug. 3, 2008. Last post by daniel_beck_90 1 year, 1 month ago.
Post by Psytek (108 posts) See mini bio
674 ACH / 13799 P

Loading...
This is something that didn't come to me until I'd played flOw for quite a while, and had got used to the mechanics. I had this sudden thought that flOw, at its core, carries a really strong message about how a lot of games fail to innovate.

Obviously the 'actual' innovation in the game like the less goal-oriented approach, and the control system are really important. But I also thought it was really poignant how flOw takes the concept of levels/areas/stages in games, and really shows what you can do just by re-interpreting the status quo.

You don't have loading screens between areas, you can go back or forwards whenever you want, to effectively any part of the game and its a really refreshing contrast with the standard idea of "kill all the dudes in this level, go to exit door, load next level". In fact that's the way I found myself trying to play the game to begin with, but eventually I saw that you didn't have to play like that, and you can move through the world backwards and forwards however you want.

It made me stop and think how boring some games are because they just stick to the tried-and-true formula of "level 1 -> level 2 ..."
Of course there are lots of games like that which are good, but I just think its really great to see people breaking out of the established ideas in gaming, and I really love how so many PSN games are following this pattern.

Thoughts?



Post by Vaxadrin (1,788 posts) See mini bio

Loading...
I agree.


Post by Discorsi (1,055 posts) See mini bio
658 ACH / 13540 P

Loading...
Meh that game was still about getting huge as hell.  I thought it was pretty lame becuase there was no real point in playing it.  Once i realized that it lost it's charm but for a while i enjoyed getting more complex.


Post by Rowr (2,470 posts) See mini bio
1001 ACH / 16140 P

Loading...
I dont necessarily think the game is a "commentary" on anything, but its definitely shows what can be done with some smooth design.

If the game was a commentary on anything i think it would be on the inherent nature of life to grow and consume.

At first i wasnt really sure it was a "game" at all, but after a few minutes i realised it hides the mechanics much better than other games, and is a cleaner, smoother experience for doing so.

The challenges of the game are set by yourself, of course people who have been programmed with years of playing games that follow the standard design will hate that, but i found it refreshing and very much in keeping with the relaxed experience.

I really think its time games started pushing into the territory of not clearly explaining everything in a game, but rather let you enjoy the process of discovering/working it out for yourself. Much like a stanley kubrick movie in comparison to your typical hollywood "leave no viewer behind" production.

Psytek said:
"T I had this sudden thought that flOw, at its core, carries a really strong message about how a lot of games fail to innovate. "
I dont think the game innovates so much in mechanics, but rather design. Ii think the game shows that simpler less cluttered mechanics and design can be just as rewarding as a variety of complex mechanics and a visual barrage.



Post by Davvyk (129 posts) See mini bio
1028 ACH / 19741 P

Loading...
although you could move to the next level without killing all enemys in the stage you could not complete the zone as a whole without doing that. When you got to the end the final "door" was still locked. so for me its just the same premise except for its spread over the entire chapter instead of applying it to individual levels


Post by atejas (2,669 posts) See mini bio

Loading...
In the same way that Pacman is about drug abuse.
Think about it. The maze represents the horrors of the man's own past, a labyrinth of his own mind. The ghosts represent people he has wronged in the past, come to exact revenge on him in his dreams. The 'pellets' are a disguised metaphor for a substance which lets the man confront his past, if only temporarily. Once he sobers up, he must continue living in fear of them.
The very game is about how broken this man is. Look at pacman himself- an incomplete circle.
tl;dr no, and you're reading too deep.


Post by lvl10Wizard (256 posts) See mini bio
1463 ACH / 31380 P

Loading...
There's nothing wrong with reading deeply into subjects and gaining multiple interpretations. Of course Pacman is about drug abuse, everybody knows that!


Post by Bellum (1,321 posts) See mini bio

Loading...
Unless flOw changed a whole lot after it was made into a ps3 game, it didn't really do anything that hadn't been done before. It was fun for a few minutes, but that's about it.


Post by Kush (6,797 posts) See mini bio
5018 ACH / 111567 P

Loading...

Moderator

I don't  find flOw to be commentary on anything. I think the flOw is just this simple "game" you play to relax...doesn't work for me, but I know others love the game. It may be commentary on something; but not on the stagnation of video games.


Post by Rowr (2,470 posts) See mini bio
1001 ACH / 16140 P

Loading...
Davvyk said:
"although you could move to the next level without killing all enemys in the stage you could not complete the zone as a whole without doing that. When you got to the end the final "door" was still locked. so for me its just the same premise except for its spread over the entire chapter instead of applying it to individual levels"
are you sure about that? im pretty sure i completed levels without killing everything.


Post by BiggerBomb (5,747 posts) See mini bio

Loading...
I think you read a little too much into it...


Post by LCad (155 posts) See mini bio
638 ACH / 12705 P

Loading...
flOw is just a souped up version of Shark! Shark!, is it not?


Post by get2sammyb (4,189 posts) See mini bio
46 ACH / 725 P

Loading...
Wow... talk about searching for hidden depths. What you came up with is great if you're looking for metaphor but all I could think about while playing that game is how shit the six axis tilt controls are.

And I fear I'll think the same thing when fl0wer comes round.


Post by Davvyk (129 posts) See mini bio
1028 ACH / 19741 P

Loading...
Rowr said:
"Davvyk said:
"although you could move to the next level without killing all enemys in the stage you could not complete the zone as a whole without doing that. When you got to the end the final "door" was still locked. so for me its just the same premise except for its spread over the entire chapter instead of applying it to individual levels"
are you sure about that? im pretty sure i completed levels without killing everything."
Ive deffo reached the end of a level and the final finishing gate would not be active. then going back and killing more things made it active.


Post by Rowr (2,470 posts) See mini bio
1001 ACH / 16140 P

Loading...
Davvyk said:
"Rowr said:
"Davvyk said:
"although you could move to the next level without killing all enemys in the stage you could not complete the zone as a whole without doing that. When you got to the end the final "door" was still locked. so for me its just the same premise except for its spread over the entire chapter instead of applying it to individual levels"
are you sure about that? im pretty sure i completed levels without killing everything."
Ive deffo reached the end of a level and the final finishing gate would not be active. then going back and killing more things made it activeT"
That sux. That kind of ruins the point imo.


Post by Davvyk (129 posts) See mini bio
1028 ACH / 19741 P

Loading...
Rowr said:
"Davvyk said:
"Rowr said:
"Davvyk said:
"although you could move to the next level without killing all enemys in the stage you could not complete the zone as a whole without doing that. When you got to the end the final "door" was still locked. so for me its just the same premise except for its spread over the entire chapter instead of applying it to individual levels"
are you sure about that? im pretty sure i completed levels without killing everything."
Ive deffo reached the end of a level and the final finishing gate would not be active. then going back and killing more things made it activeT"
That sux. That kind of ruins the point imo."
I suppose from the design stand-point it gave the game the starting and finishing point that defines a "game" but yeah now ive thought about it it would of been cool to have just left it that you didnt have to kill things. in essence you would be making the choice to make the experience a game if you so choose.

Real world example. i could walk to work today like i normally do. or i could drive in a burnout fashion setting myself a goal of 2.9 seconds of getting there making the experience a game.

Lucky i dont own a car.


Post by daniel_beck_90 (2,289 posts) See mini bio

Loading...
Agreed





Jacob816
47 points

Psytek
37 points

Quadrifoglio
22 points

Sentry
3 points

LuckyWanderDude
3 points


You are in Edit Mode. Make sure to save your work at the end!!
  • Submissions can take 24 hours to be moderated.
  • Please leave a comment to explain why you're making this change.
Save Changes Cancel