GDC Podcasts

Avatar image for genjai
Genjai

311

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Genjai

I was so blown away by the incredible things the developers had to say about the gaming press and the gaming industry as a whole.

I'm curious to the community's reaction.

1) Do you like hearing the developer's thoughts?

2) Do you agree/disagree that gameplay is on the rise?

3) Were you bored or captivated by Paul Barnett's discussion?

Avatar image for vaiz
vaiz

3188

Forum Posts

28

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 4

#2  Edited By vaiz

1.) Very much so. These sorts of things help to humanize game development. How often do you think of game developers as people? I mean, obviously they're people, but... Well, you should get what I mean, I guess.
2.) Yes and no. I think we've hit a stagnation point when it comes to big name commercial games, but when it comes to the indie side of things, definitely.
3.) He repeated himself once or twice, but aside from that, he had my attention the entire time.

Avatar image for damswedon
damswedon

3246

Forum Posts

1809

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 12

#3  Edited By damswedon

yes to all

Avatar image for penguindust
penguindust

13129

Forum Posts

22

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#4  Edited By penguindust

Absolutely, although the 1st GDC podcast was a bit disorganized for the 1st half-hour or so, it eventually found some focus.

Honestly, I don't know.  I think it's hard to say when it is mostly hardcore game developers and games media whose focus audience is the hardcore discuss that topic without a strong knowledge on the casuals.  I think one of the best questions asked, although I don't recall a clear answer, was "are all of you guys [hardcore game makers] in the wrong business [making hardcore games]?

Captivated by Paul Barnett...now I am off to "funkytown"

Avatar image for toowalrus
toowalrus

13408

Forum Posts

29

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#5  Edited By toowalrus

Paul kind of bored me, until he started talking about his giant man plugged into his computer.

Avatar image for hamz
Hamz

6900

Forum Posts

25432

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#6  Edited By Hamz
  • I'd rather hear the Developer's thoughts than the publishers or even video games journalists. Mainly because these dudes and dudettes create games for a living, its great to hear what inspires them to create what they do and keep going on and doing it even after they've perhaps made bad decisions in the past. As someone said already it helps to humanise them when its all too easy to demonise them for possible bad design decisions and games in the past.
  • I'd say gameplay is being considered more, but there is a point where you can't change how many ways there is to shoot guys. On the other hand this sort of relates to the first question, hearing developers discuss what they think is on the rise. What they think can be done to improve it and so on. But again new blood into the industry can reboot somewhat stagnating concepts.
  • Paul Barnett's piece was entirely captivating and I enjoyed every moment of it. The man is a god amongst men!
Avatar image for get2sammyb
get2sammyb

6686

Forum Posts

1993

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 4

#7  Edited By get2sammyb
TooWalrus said:
"Paul kind of bored me, until he started talking about his giant man plugged into his computer."
I agree. That guy, urgh, something about him irritated me. I'm sure he's a top guy and all -- I'm just talking purely from the sensibility of the podcast.

I enjoyed the first podcast but didn't feel like the structure nor subject matter gelled with GiantBomb's mentality - things got a bit too super-serious, which while interesting, is something that GiantBomb have said no to from the start. For me GiantBomb is all about - "this game is fun", "this game is not fun" mentality without any pretense.

What did interest me is the reputation Giant Bomb seems to have -- I knew Jeff and the gang were respected among the industry, but it sounds to me, almost like, they're kinda the pioneers of video game journalism. I dunno -- I don't want that to sound to ass-kissy but y'get what I mean right - like everyone seems to know and respect them. Even the developers who may be on the end of some product criticism.
Avatar image for tekmojo
tekmojo

2365

Forum Posts

104

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

#8  Edited By tekmojo

They keeps it real. I like that.

Avatar image for liveordie1212
LiveOrDie1212

944

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By LiveOrDie1212

all i got from that podcast was that Paul Barnett thinks the ps2 was evil, and his son is a prodigy at video games. that is all.

oh, and somehting about plastic dudes being plugged into a computer....?

Avatar image for get2sammyb
get2sammyb

6686

Forum Posts

1993

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 4

#10  Edited By get2sammyb
LiveOrDie1212 said:
"

all i got from that podcast was that Paul Barnett thinks the ps2 was evil, and his son is a prodigy at video games. that is all.

"
Haha yeah. He wasn't much of a Playstation fan was he?
Avatar image for hamz
Hamz

6900

Forum Posts

25432

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#11  Edited By Hamz
get2sammyb said:
"What did interest me is the reputation Giant Bomb seems to have -- I knew Jeff and the gang were respected among the industry, but it sounds to me, almost like, they're kinda the pioneers of video game journalism. I dunno -- I don't want that to sound to ass-kissy but y'get what I mean right - like everyone seems to know and respect them. Even the developers who may be on the end of some product criticism."
Considering they've been doing the job for most of their adult lives I imagine they've struck up some professional friendships with people within the industry.
Avatar image for musdy
musdy

319

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#12  Edited By musdy

I felt that paul was kinda annoying with his whole "My kid" bit.

Avatar image for flipperdesert
FlipperDesert

2236

Forum Posts

40

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#13  Edited By FlipperDesert
get2sammyb said:
"TooWalrus said:
"Paul kind of bored me, until he started talking about his giant man plugged into his computer."
I agree. That guy, urgh, something about him irritated me. I'm sure he's a top guy and all -- I'm just talking purely from the sensibility of the podcast.I enjoyed the first podcast but didn't feel like the structure nor subject matter gelled with GiantBomb's mentality - things got a bit too super-serious, which while interesting, is something that GiantBomb have said no to from the start. For me GiantBomb is all about - "this game is fun", "this game is not fun" mentality without any pretense.What did interest me is the reputation Giant Bomb seems to have -- I knew Jeff and the gang were respected among the industry, but it sounds to me, almost like, they're kinda the pioneers of video game journalism. I dunno -- I don't want that to sound to ass-kissy but y'get what I mean right - like everyone seems to know and respect them. Even the developers who may be on the end of some product criticism."
I hate to sound too fanboyish as well, but I think that with one of the other points brought up about game reviews evolving and individuals becoming more well-known like with film reviews, GB could be an example of that happening. With larger review sites, I couldn't say the name of one reviewer off the top of my head, it all melds into "This site said this game was good." with the occasional "Oh, it's that guy that reviewed that other game! Hey, guy!" Here, I can even name a couple of behind-the-scenes guys, and you get the general idea of where the reviewer's coming from in a personal taste standpoint, as it's just the four guys mostly.

Oh, and I liked what Paul had to say, I was kind of out of it for bits but I totally agree that people should work more on gameplay (AI improvments would also be pretty great) and less on graphics and gimmicky control schemes. Don't worry, Funkytown is loading.

Yay 100th post to me!
Avatar image for vinchenzo
Vinchenzo

6461

Forum Posts

245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 2

#14  Edited By Vinchenzo

I hated the GDC Bombcast. Well didn't hate it, but keep reading on...

  • Too many people.
  • Paul was alright at first, but by the time he reached the second "my boy..." I was bored of him.
  • Anyone who talks over Greg Kasavin must burn in hell.
  • Not enough of the people I actually care about.

I did however really enjoy the Tuesday normal Bombcast with the GRIN folks. Very funny.
Avatar image for jakob187
jakob187

22972

Forum Posts

10045

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 9

#15  Edited By jakob187

The first day's podcast was absolute hysteria and I really couldn't listen to it because of all the people trying to talk over each other and such.  I find it interesting that most people didn't dig Paul because he wasn't being super hilarious and shit, because I really enjoyed listening to him talk about some philosophy of a developer standpoint.  I really liked how he related his own childhood gaming to his son's, as it shows a major contrast of the industry in the last 20 years.  So fuck all the haters.


The second day's podcast was great because it wasn't a super Rock Band-centric podcast.  There was a lot of good talk on that one.

Personally, I'm just waiting for them to have Mr. Bionic Commando on, Mr. Ben Judd!!!
Avatar image for daniel_beck_90
daniel_beck_90

3243

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

#16  Edited By daniel_beck_90
  • Yes
  • I agree
  • No , not really
Avatar image for crimsonarmy
CrimsonArmy

4

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17  Edited By CrimsonArmy

1) Yes. I always love meeting and getting to know the dev's of my favorite games.
     Although if I get a negative vibe from them, that could influence my opinion of they're game.

2) I believe that game play is on the rise, but I also believe that could hurt the industry. A lot of games lacking creativity, originality, and quality game play are becoming mainstream,
     and outselling the deserving games. =/ Take Army of 2 for example haha.

3) Not at all. One of the reasons I fell in love with the Warhammer world is Paul Barnett. He's an amazing public speaker and personality.

Avatar image for jayge_
Jayge_

10269

Forum Posts

2045

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

#18  Edited By Jayge_

Paul Barnett was a fucking dynamo. Great guy. I would have loved to hear him talk even more. It was also interesting to hear that Chris guy (forgot his last name :-( ) talk about audio design in games, which is always something I pay attention to that nobody seems to really regard very seriously. I listened to the normal Bombcast this week, the GDC cast, and I'm listening to the second GDC cast. I've never really completed a Bombcast by Saturday, so this is an accomplishment.

Avatar image for prinny_god
prinny_god

337

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#19  Edited By prinny_god

I like the 2nd one better the first one was really boring

Avatar image for ddensel
ddensel

423

Forum Posts

5610

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#20  Edited By ddensel

Too many people, I think 4 or 5 guys is a maximum for podcasts.

The guests were kinda hit and miss. Greg Kasavin and Alex Navarro are great as always, and Paul Barnett had a lot of interesting things to say, but everyone else was just a blur.