#1 Edited by BigJeffrey (4950 posts) -

Next Gen Systems, Will be shown at Microsoft's Unveiling of the Next Xbox.

Infinity Ward birthed the master piece that was COD 4, can they ever live up to that?

Loading Video...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQEbPn36m1c

#2 Posted by TooWalrus (13319 posts) -

CALL!

#3 Posted by jdh5153 (1097 posts) -

Will there be guns??

Cross platform?

Infinity Ward birthed the master piece that was COD 4, can they ever live up to that?

http://www.callofduty.com/______

What do you mean can they ever live up to that? They also made MW2 and 3 you know? Each was a major improvement over the previous edition, so yes they already have 'lived up to that' and will again. Can't wait for GHOSTS.

#4 Edited by Monopolized (554 posts) -

@jdh5153: if you think MW2 and MW3 were better then COD 4.. I respect your opinnion, but it's wrong.

#5 Edited by RecSpec (4527 posts) -

G-G-G-G-GHOSTS!!

#6 Edited by Creamypies (4158 posts) -

That teaser site is suffering from serious ghost problems. More Call of Duty though, eh? I hope it's a collection of fishing mini games this time round.

#7 Posted by Nightriff (6143 posts) -

Meh, haven't played CoD since MW3 and that was only to play the story and then return it to GameStop the same day

#8 Edited by BigJeffrey (4950 posts) -

if you think MW2 and MW3 were better then COD 4.. I respect your opinnion, but it's wrong.

I concur

#9 Posted by Ravenlight (8057 posts) -

It will actually be a Call of Duty/Call of Juarez crossover.

#10 Edited by Oldirtybearon (5167 posts) -

@monopolized said:

@jdh5153: if you think MW2 and MW3 were better then COD 4.. I respect your opinnion, but it's wrong.

MW2 had amazing multiplayer. I was hooked on it for a good eight months, and the campaign was pretty great. Full of plot holes, but pretty great to play.

I'm not sure why people shit on MW2. It was an excellent follow up to the ground breaking Modern Warfare.

Online
#11 Edited by Rainbowkisses (519 posts) -

So is the idea that when enough people join to fill out the picture there will be some big reveal?

#12 Posted by BigBoss1911 (2650 posts) -

Fuck this series

#13 Edited by hakunin (403 posts) -

@recspec said:

G-G-G-G-GHOSTS!!

Yup. The number of underscores in the URL fits.

Also we knew this.

Also, yaaawn...

#14 Edited by Darson (466 posts) -

if you think MW2 and MW3 were better then COD 4.. I respect your opinnion, but it's wrong.

I concur

Not only that, but the development team increasingly fell apart after COD4 (especially by MW3) and more teams got involved.

#15 Posted by konig_kei (736 posts) -

well, i found something....

#16 Edited by BigJeffrey (4950 posts) -

well, i found something....

YOLO

#17 Posted by Snail (8769 posts) -

ghosts cant eat

#18 Posted by the_OFFICIAL_jAPanese_teaBAG (4311 posts) -

well, i found something....

YOLO

#FISH

#19 Edited by FunkasaurasRex (855 posts) -

@konig_kei said:

well, i found something....

I love the internet

#20 Edited by CastroCasper (1393 posts) -

I thought this was gonna be a thread where we filled in the ______ part. :(

#21 Edited by ZeForgotten (10368 posts) -

@darson said:

@bigjeffrey said:

if you think MW2 and MW3 were better then COD 4.. I respect your opinnion, but it's wrong.

I concur

Not only that, but the development team increasingly fell apart after COD4 (especially by MW3) and more teams got involved.

And yet, the only change to the Call of Duty series made after COD4 was that the credits got shorter and shorter because people got fired here and there.

#22 Posted by FLYmeatwad (164 posts) -

I definitely think, thinking about the way narrative worked in something like Black Ops 2 compared to the other CoD games this generation, the series has made strides since CoD4, both in terms of single player and multiplayer.

#23 Posted by djou (895 posts) -
#24 Edited by MariachiMacabre (7097 posts) -

I don't think Ghosts is a good subtitle. I think it's kind of a lame attempt to one-up the "edginess" of Black Ops.

#25 Edited by Quarters (2081 posts) -

Is it weird that I'm getting a post apocalyptic vibe from everything?

#26 Edited by BigJeffrey (4950 posts) -

I don't think Ghosts is a good subtitle. I think it's kind of a lame attempt to one-up the "edginess" of Black Ops.

Call of duty the brand is what sells games

#27 Posted by Winternet (8236 posts) -

Uuhhh... what?

#28 Posted by Blu3V3nom07 (4186 posts) -

I call malarky on this thread title. This thread was something about callofduty.com______ Something. :Sleepy:

#29 Posted by PeasantAbuse (5094 posts) -

I HAVE A WEAKNESS FOR MASKS

#30 Posted by MariachiMacabre (7097 posts) -

I don't think Ghosts is a good subtitle. I think it's kind of a lame attempt to one-up the "edginess" of Black Ops.

Call of duty the brand is what sells games

Obviously. That has nothing to do with what I said.

#31 Edited by JouselDelka (981 posts) -
@bigboss1911 said:

Fuck this series

I for one am thankful for this terribly un-creative series because it brought millions of people into gaming. Thanks to this brand, it's easy for me to get new friends into games and have them playing co-op and multiplayer with me and having a blast. They all know about Call of Duty and think they're gaming experts, which makes them more prone to hold the mouse.

Always start by showing them the new Call of Duty, then you can gradually ease them into good games. Before the CoD craze, this was a mission impossible.

I played CoD 5 zombies with my roommate for two days, he was reluctant to play anything outside FIFA and NFS until I showed him zombies. Now two weeks later we're playing Torchlight 2 and stealth games, among other "core" stuff.

CoD knows how to hit that sweet spot that makes non-gamers wanna jump in, it's quite fascinating how quality intimidates them yet this shitty brand intrigues them.

#32 Posted by Video_Game_King (36567 posts) -

@snail said:

ghosts cant eat

Buddhists would disagree....maybe.

#33 Edited by marchismo (87 posts) -

The release date for this should've been 10.31.13. They fucked up.

#34 Posted by stryker1121 (1754 posts) -

And somewhere a kitten dies..

#35 Posted by EuanDewar (5141 posts) -

I dunno this could be a great game that I could really enjoy playing as could millions of others

#36 Edited by Bourbon_Warrior (4569 posts) -

@monopolized said:

@jdh5153: if you think MW2 and MW3 were better then COD 4.. I respect your opinnion, but it's wrong.

I dunno MW2 was pretty great, probably the best roller coaster campaign I have played. Spec Ops was some really great co-op whether online or on the couch, from racing snowmobiles to doing MGS type stealth missions in the fog. Online got really crazy with some of the best COD maps out of all the games IMO, piloting that AC-130 for the 1st time was a real rush, and experiencing the first Nuke was a real WTF moment, but all that was ruined by the hacking which was a shame. COD 4 was really good and revolutionary but I fricken loved MW2. I thought MW3 was garbage though and Black Ops 2's campaigns had some alright moments and some nice graphics for a game running at 60fps on a 8 year old console, but zombies is nothing like some good Spec Ops missions.