Poor Alex having to review this crap
Seems about right
Speaking as a fundamentally terrible person on every imaginable level, I disagree. I want nothing to do with this shit.
I think that second screenshot literally say it all.
You probably didn't even have to write the review alex.
I'm so sorry, Alex.
Now say I hate my life and everyone in it. Is Family Guy: Back to the Multiverse the game for me?
I'd buy a second Premium membership to watch an Endurance Run of this game.
Alex, I feel for you, but someone has to endure so the rest of us dont have to.
If you are a fundamentally terrible person on every imaginable level, then Family Guy: Back to the Multiverse is the video game for you.
Absolutely perfect. This review was too much fun to read.
@SeanFoster: It'd be about a four hour endurance run. Not really worth the price of admission.
i think someone in the SF office should review a garbage game once and a while, give alex a break.
Worst game he's done since Big Rigs?
Not if Alex continues to churn out gold like this. I had to reread it because it was too good.
I at least had fun thinking about you playing this awful game, that's something right?
Yup, I am not shocked at all. That show is filth so I am not surprised the game is either.
This is the review posted today that I care about.
Much platonic love for you Alex.
You know, when this came out with no fan fare and that "DIY" review from OXM I think it was I had a feeling you would be reviewing this, Alex. I enjoyed reading this more then I think you enjoyed playing it, if that's any consolation. @DougCL: Alex chooses to review the games he does. A lot of people seem to forget that haha - Sometimes I suspect he does it out of curiosity and because sometimes... somebody has to.
Alex, why would you do this to yourself when you could be doing fun, joyful things like updating Year of the Cage? :(
God bless you, Alex. You have done the lord's work.
Alex in fine form in this review.
@Alex Thankfully, I choose to live in a world where quality instead of DVD-sales twist Fox's arm. Unrelated: the 3rd season of Firefly is not half bad.
At least this review was fun to read. Hopefully that makes it worth the effort for you dude.
I want to go to there.
This and South Park: Tenorman's Revenge. A year of quality tv show video games.
@Extreme_Popcorn said:Poor Alex having to review this crapWorst game he's done since Big Rigs?
I don't remember Big Rigs being a quote "warcrime" unquote.
Also Jewish people who vomit are fun because they have funny hats. Joke explained, you're welcome :)
That is an excellent quote.
I think they're supposed to be Amish.
Family Guy is funny in 15 second YouTube clips. A 22 minute episode is only mildly tolerable. I can't imagine playing a 5 hour game that is somehow on a lower level, humor wise.
I don't know if the show was ever funny or its just now I'm not a 14 year old.
the first two paragraphs are perfect, thank you Alex. this show gets a pass because people associate "edgy" humor with counterculture, i.e. progress. but there's no veil of satire or irony, it's just unapologetic bigotry. shit is disgusting.
Ok, so I'm buying this instead of Far Cry 3. I mean, 1st is better than fifth, am I right?
@civid said:Also Jewish people who vomit are fun because they have funny hats. Joke explained, you're welcome :)I think they're supposed to be Amish.
Well fuck... Then I don't get it at all :/
Also, this game is full priced? Are these people fucking insane!(?)!
Kinda wanna buy this just to see how bad it is...
There's no way in Hell I was going to play this game in the first place- but at least some good came of it's existence This review made me laugh, and that's more than I've ever gotten from Family Guy, frankly.
Alex suffers, that we might be spared.
I didn't expect this game to be good, but I also didn't expect 7 of the 11 paragraphs in this review to be a diatribe against Family Guy. 1 paragraph decrying the game's ethics maybe, but as written it does a disservice to any Family Guy fans who just want to know if the game is any good mechanically. The reviewer so clearly enjoys railing against the premise and content, I think it would be difficult to take his comments on the gameplay, mechanics, or execution seriously. Next time, please put the rant on your blog, and link to it from the review.
Only just now do I appreciate that The Simpsons Game was a kind of funny, well-written, decent couch co-op game.
I can't believe Jeff made you review this.
Worst thing about this is that it'll probably sell okay
@anotherfluke: Actually, if you read carefully, you'd note that I specifically say this game is horrendous completely outside the normal bounds of Family Guy. I don't even have a problem with Family Guy or MacFarlane. I think he is capable of being clever at times. This game exudes absolutely none of that cleverness, and just goes for the cheap giggle from every douchebag who thinks calling things 'gay' is hilarity incarnate. And I specifically said as much up front and in one of the captions.
So, hey, maybe read closer next time before commenting.
That is exactly not the content of the review... All those points are to highlight how the game peddles this nonsense without any of the parody or comedy of the show, and that the game totally misses the point of what people find funny about the show. The crux of the review is essentially "If you like Family Guy, you probably won't like this. If you're a piece of shit, you might." Sounds pretty accurate to me.
What is the level of dismay that Alex endures when he realizes that he can't give a zero-star review score, and forcibly has to give at least a one-star review?
Sure, a review score is merely a visual representation to an overall and out-of-context glance, but what must one person endure when this person doesn't even want give a game's related review the satisfaction, nor the good graces that is so undeserved.
Alas, poor Alex - and I shall quote:
James Gordon: Because he's the hero Giant Bomb deserves, but not the one it needs right now. So he'll play terrible video games because he can take it. Because he's not our hero. He's a snarky guardian, a watchful pessimist. A dark knight.
That's a hell of an opening line!
You are hands down the best writer on the site alex. This review EXUDES anger and frustration in a way that no one else on the site can.
Family Guy: Back to the Multiverse is actually funny (at times). The cutscenes read like they could be part of the show, with the exception that they look bizarre in 3D, and the sight gags in the levels are good for a chuckle. Packing a Mature rating, the game even gets crasser than the TV show in a few sections, notably in the frat boy level where a drunken Lois asks “Any of you boys ever finish on a C-section scar?” and follows up with “I can’t have babies anymore, so fill me up, fellas!”
There’s a lot to enjoy, but none of it will knock your socks off.
Back to the Multiverse is a pretty average third-person shooter, but the Family Guy humor and callbacks make for a fun title.
-IGN.com, pinnacles of professional criticism
@anotherfluke: Everything in the review seemed relevant to the game, the few mentions of the TV show were simply stating that the jokes in that are usually better written or obvious attempts at parody. In a game based on a TV show, a few references to said show and its style were kind of inevitable, but it never once sounded to me like he hates the show. Just the game.
Stay strong, Alex Navarro.
@iAmJohn said:@civid said:Also Jewish people who vomit are fun because they have funny hats. Joke explained, you're welcome :)I think they're supposed to be Amish.Well fuck... Then I don't get it at all :/Also, this game is full priced? Are these people fucking insane!(?)!
I was going to write up an explanation, but this is actually much easier to explain with video.
The review was a pleasure to read. Which I'm sure brings Alex no solace due to the depths of craptitude he had to put up with in order to review this travesty.
@Alex: Thanks for the response Alex. I did read the review a few times, because the first time I skimmed over the editorial criticism looking for information about the game (I have a morbid curiosity with licensed IPs, and hope that one will surprise me by being good), and was surprised by how much of the review was just that. I hope you take my comment as feedback on what I'd like to see from a review, not just as a Family Guy fanboy who is mad at a negative review. I really do think that this review is harmed by the amount of time spent on the content vs. mechanics or gameplay. If you disagree, that's fine, but come back and re-read your review in a couple weeks and see if you still feel the same way.