so I heard it has lots of weapons
You know its not a James bond game unless there is a wetsuit involved. I also love that you can literally disarm and kill a person easily.
I miss pierce but the game looks great.
Who keeps deciding to post these? Its pretty obvious from the comments that nobody is really looking forward to this game.
It just doesn't look that pretty, and no one is talking up a control scheme change or anything. Pass.
Do these guys really think they are offering anything new? What separates Bond from other games is choice...the choice to either shoot or shoot with silenced weapons. That is neither a choice or anything new.
That is their 006 eh? I mean I guess it is hard to replace Sean Bean, but why? This game is so weird.
Replacing Brosnan with Craig I could kinda forgive for the sake of trying to mesh this in to current Bond canon for people unfamiliar with earlier films, but why the hell is everybody else completely different? This game seems to be moving in a direction that's about as interesting as the background for the first interviewee.
Goldeneye source is much better than this from what ive seen
" Do these guys really think they are offering anything new? What separates Bond from other games is choice...the choice to either shoot or shoot with silenced weapons. That is neither a choice or anything new. "
It's shocking to me how the folks who are made to do this just don't seem to know that they're saying the exact same things every other developer that's ever made a Bond game - or just a FPS - has said. "We really make you feel like Bond. No, really this time." "The experience is defined by choice. Like, you can choose who you shoot first." It's embarrassing. I hope it was scripted, not because that would make it better but then at least it wouldn't be their fault. I hope you made a good shooter, guys, and I'm looking forward to playing it, but don't pretend you've revolutionized the industry by remaking a N64 game. That's insulting.
I love how the guy at the end has to remind us that this is indeed Goldeneye....
" Goldeneye source is much better than this from what ive seen "
Well thanks for spoiling the game, assholes.
Embarrassing... these developer pre release of game commentaries usually have at least something useful to say. But ANYONE can see through this fluff and just see it is a lame ass attempt at hyping a game. Choices... HA! If they are trying to sell the game on that then fail. Lots of weapons... HA! I'll stick with borderlands if I really give a shit about that kind of stuff. I think everyone knew this was a poor idea when they first announced it.
my constantly saying how amazing it is and how much people are going to remember it... that's just making me think it's being set up to fail harder...
This looks fucking terrible. I'm sorry but it just does.
" I love how the guy at the end has to remind us that this is indeed Goldeneye.... "
No publisher wants to believe that a Bond adventure game where he flirts with women and orders caviar will sell. I believe those publishers are wrong. I believe Telltale can prove them wrong.
" I miss pierce but the game looks great. "
" That is their 006 eh? I mean I guess it is hard to replace Sean Bean, but why? This game is so weird. "
" @subyman said: " I miss pierce but the game looks great. "Really? Really? ...really? Really? There's no way that you're serious. Did I just get trolled? I can't tell. Really? "
this isn't Goldeneye, it's CoD with 007 skins.
Oh god, the graphics are horrible. I haven't been less excited for a game for a long time.
get a new marketing team, kthkbye
" @Cybexx said: " That is their 006 eh? I mean I guess it is hard to replace Sean Bean, but why? This game is so weird. "I'm glad they didn't replace Sean Bean with Mr. Bean. But how cool would Rowan Atkinson be as a Bond villain, eh? No Austin Powers yukking around, a real deal Bond villain. "
The only thing this game does is make me want to plug in my N64, call up a few buddies and run some Goldeneye. Is anybody actually excited for this game?
TBH, I'm not sure how the game looks because i was distracted by quite possibly the worst sales pitch i have ever seen. Wow guys, can you cram some more meaningless buzz words into your interviews? Boss characters, you say? Choices, eh? And stealth! And I really couldn't believe how he just laid the plot out like that. Not that anyone is coming to GE for the story, but its presented in an incredibly awkward way. "And there are great plot twists... that I will now explain in surprising detail!"
Definitely won't be as good as the original.
I'm intrigued by the idea of "reimagining" a Bond story that has already been told, and then "re-imagined" once before with the original GE game. I don't hate the idea, despite my impulses to dismiss it out of hand as a shallow attempt to cash in on a beloved classic name. However, if they were going to do it, I wish they'd have given it the full treatment and made it a proper X360/PS3 release too, like the other upcoming Bond game. Those Wii graphics look fucking awful, and are not a proper device for telling an atmospheric "real-world" story. - Scott
I wanted to make fun of something in this trailer, but I'm too sad now that I've actually watched it.
No, I will not "get my friends" now that Goldeneye is back. It still bothers me that people are using a free recital for Wii shooters rather than a fixed-screen one.
Man, those graphics look like the N64 version. Is that for the nostalgia effect?
these are the same guys that made dead space: extraction. don't pass judgment yet.
This game had better start with a jumping-off-a-dam level or its gonna bomb.
Looks pretty bad.
It's a little unfair to say it looks like the N64 game.
"Enormous" is not an accurate description for 25 weapons when you consider the countless variety of firepower in Borderlands. Also, why is the guy in the bathroom stall pooping with his pants up? Maybe the villains in this game wear diapers.
If I see one more video for this game I'm going to shoot myself... plus the 006 character looks stupid.