can it ever beat the original .the original always seems better in the minds eye .then when you pop the cart in. man i thought it looked better
Still not cool to sneak up on a guy while hes on the toilet.
" That is their 006 eh? I mean I guess it is hard to replace Sean Bean, but why? This game is so weird. "Why oh why do they need to replace him? It looks like they're trying to recreate the movie as much as possible (and not the game that much) so why not get the real deal? Sean Bean ftw
Swapping out Brosnan was a bad move but leaving Sean Bean out as Trevelyan is just awful!
It just seems to me like they are trying to put lipstick on a pig with this game.
@This_Dude Yeah I think the game looks great. If you are a fan of the old golden eye game (which I played countless hours of with friends) then this is a wonderful step into nostalgia. Its doing everything I hoped it would do, redo the single player, rework the multiplayer, and not try to update things too much. I loved the feel of the old Golden Eye, I'm glad they kept it in that era instead of trying to make it something like what CoD has become. That would have been ashame.
Is this technically a retcon?
meh people looking at the graphics when graphics were never what made that game good in the first place. Also even thought he game is super old I wish they wouldn't give away the big plot twist during a promo video. I mean I would like even a small chance for the new generation to experience GoldenEye (that is if they pull it off)
everybody remembers "guy in stall"
Congratulations, you have made a 13 year old game look like a 7 year old game.
this game look completely terrible i dont hold up the original goldeneye with the same level of esteem as other but even to me this is a disgrace to its legacy
This looks amazing, guys certainly look like they put some work into it.
Terrible Dev Diary spitting out nothing but buzz words.
I hope the finished product looks a LOT better than that. GE was the Halo of its day, and it looked really good. This just looks like a 10 year old game.
LOL it sounds like these guys haven't played any FPS in about 10 years.
" @This_Dude said:Ok, now I know I've been trolled, but just in case I haven't, I wasn't talking about Pierce vs. Daniel Craig. I was appalled by the fact that this guy thinks the game looks great." @subyman said:Pierce was pretty damn good as bond. "" I miss pierce but the game looks great. "Really? Really? ...really? Really? There's no way that you're serious. Did I just get trolled? I can't tell. Really? "
So I'm confused, how many weapons is there? The text said loads but the man said lots.
Is it just me, or is it pointless/kinda insulting that they've excised Brosnan from the proceedings?
" It's a little unfair to say it looks like the N64 game.You could not have chosen a better image to get your point across. The dude staring at the wall made me literally laugh out loud. Well played, sir.
The graphics look sketchy, even for a wii game.
This trailer would interest me in 2002. It looks archaic now, like they resurrected some developers that haven't seen any games since 2001.
It's saddest for the Wii. The machine is already home to mass quantities of shovelware and direct ports of old games, and this game takes that trend to ludicrous extremes.....a sequel to a 1997 game, with 2002 technology, in 2010.
no Sean Bean???
Never trust an Activision game.
God, whoever organised the marketing for this needs to be shot. In the nipples. With salt.
If I see one more video for this game I'm going to shoot myself... plus the 006 character looks stupid.
"Enormous" is not an accurate description for 25 weapons when you consider the countless variety of firepower in Borderlands. Also, why is the guy in the bathroom stall pooping with his pants up? Maybe the villains in this game wear diapers.
It's a little unfair to say it looks like the N64 game.
Looks pretty bad.
This game had better start with a jumping-off-a-dam level or its gonna bomb.
these are the same guys that made dead space: extraction. don't pass judgment yet.
Man, those graphics look like the N64 version. Is that for the nostalgia effect?
No, I will not "get my friends" now that Goldeneye is back.
It still bothers me that people are using a free recital for Wii shooters rather than a fixed-screen one.
I wanted to make fun of something in this trailer, but I'm too sad now that I've actually watched it.
I'm intrigued by the idea of "reimagining" a Bond story that has already been told, and then "re-imagined" once before with the original GE game. I don't hate the idea, despite my impulses to dismiss it out of hand as a shallow attempt to cash in on a beloved classic name.
However, if they were going to do it, I wish they'd have given it the full treatment and made it a proper X360/PS3 release too, like the other upcoming Bond game. Those Wii graphics look fucking awful, and are not a proper device for telling an atmospheric "real-world" story.
Definitely won't be as good as the original.
TBH, I'm not sure how the game looks because i was distracted by quite possibly the worst sales pitch i have ever seen.
Wow guys, can you cram some more meaningless buzz words into your interviews? Boss characters, you say? Choices, eh? And stealth!
And I really couldn't believe how he just laid the plot out like that. Not that anyone is coming to GE for the story, but its presented in an incredibly awkward way.
"And there are great plot twists... that I will now explain in surprising detail!"
The only thing this game does is make me want to plug in my N64, call up a few buddies and run some Goldeneye.
Is anybody actually excited for this game?
" @Cybexx said:I could see a boss level where he crashes McLaren F1s at you. Either that or a lot of Black Adder references, I'd be good either way." That is their 006 eh? I mean I guess it is hard to replace Sean Bean, but why? This game is so weird. "I'm glad they didn't replace Sean Bean with Mr. Bean. But how cool would Rowan Atkinson be as a Bond villain, eh? No Austin Powers yukking around, a real deal Bond villain. "
get a new marketing team, kthkbye