God, whoever organised the marketing for this needs to be shot. In the nipples. With salt.
Never trust an Activision game.
no Sean Bean???
This trailer would interest me in 2002. It looks archaic now, like they resurrected some developers that haven't seen any games since 2001. It's saddest for the Wii. The machine is already home to mass quantities of shovelware and direct ports of old games, and this game takes that trend to ludicrous extremes.....a sequel to a 1997 game, with 2002 technology, in 2010.
The graphics look sketchy, even for a wii game.
" It's a little unfair to say it looks like the N64 game. yeah... "
Is it just me, or is it pointless/kinda insulting that they've excised Brosnan from the proceedings?
So I'm confused, how many weapons is there? The text said loads but the man said lots.
" @This_Dude said: " @subyman said: " I miss pierce but the game looks great. "Really? Really? ...really? Really? There's no way that you're serious. Did I just get trolled? I can't tell. Really? "Pierce was pretty damn good as bond. "
" @subyman said: " I miss pierce but the game looks great. "Really? Really? ...really? Really? There's no way that you're serious. Did I just get trolled? I can't tell. Really? "
" I miss pierce but the game looks great. "
LOL it sounds like these guys haven't played any FPS in about 10 years.
I hope the finished product looks a LOT better than that. GE was the Halo of its day, and it looked really good. This just looks like a 10 year old game.
GoldenEye had nothing on Perfect Dark's weapon choices. Pssh 25 weapons. Try 42 weapons, nearly each of them with an alternate firing mode.
Terrible Dev Diary spitting out nothing but buzz words.
@ napalmtrees: Well, both the N64 game and this "thing" don't have shadows...
This looks amazing, guys certainly look like they put some work into it.
this game look completely terrible i dont hold up the original goldeneye with the same level of esteem as other but even to me this is a disgrace to its legacy
Congratulations, you have made a 13 year old game look like a 7 year old game.
everybody remembers "guy in stall"
meh people looking at the graphics when graphics were never what made that game good in the first place. Also even thought he game is super old I wish they wouldn't give away the big plot twist during a promo video. I mean I would like even a small chance for the new generation to experience GoldenEye (that is if they pull it off)
Is this technically a retcon?
@This_Dude Yeah I think the game looks great. If you are a fan of the old golden eye game (which I played countless hours of with friends) then this is a wonderful step into nostalgia. Its doing everything I hoped it would do, redo the single player, rework the multiplayer, and not try to update things too much. I loved the feel of the old Golden Eye, I'm glad they kept it in that era instead of trying to make it something like what CoD has become. That would have been ashame.
It just seems to me like they are trying to put lipstick on a pig with this game.
Swapping out Brosnan was a bad move but leaving Sean Bean out as Trevelyan is just awful!
" That is their 006 eh? I mean I guess it is hard to replace Sean Bean, but why? This game is so weird. "
Still not cool to sneak up on a guy while hes on the toilet.
can it ever beat the original .the original always seems better in the minds eye .then when you pop the cart in. man i thought it looked better