I see a lot of words but none of them are about two-step authentication.
Why is no one asking about that? Microsoft keeps reiterating that they're very concerned with the online security of their customers etc. PR speak blablah, yet they haven't once mentioned this obvious solution in the form of a security measure designed specifically to protect against account hijacks.
And they literally have everything in place for it too. I don't understand why they haven't done it already, or said anything about doing it. It's just really weird that they do not prioritize preemptive measures. Suppose it's good that they've introduced a couple of things that makes it easier for them/you to recover your account after it has gotten hijacked, but what the shit?
And Stepto says a lot about wanting to improve things. Well, what steps are you taking in order to make that happen, and is there a timeframe for when we should start seeing results?
Since investigations can be resolved relatively quickly (ask Geoff Keighley how long his took) it seems to me like the length of investigations is an issue of manpower more than it being technically difficult, which it really shouldn't be. After you've established who's the perp and who's the vic, what else is there to investigate? Recover the account to its rightful owner and unlock it. This process should not be complicated for accounts that have not gotten region migrated.
Microsoft appears negligent. They didn't (and seemingly still don't care to) implement measures to prevent this problem from happening, they are incapable of dealing with affected users in a timely fashion, and they're non-committal about introducing any potential improvements.
Although this is good.
@Stepto said:
The thing that’s unique about FIFA is that is has a really, really rich marketplace where the player has a ton of capability in terms of being able to share content and trade content. That’s one of the things we’re working with EA on. How do we detect and try to prevent people from using those rich experiences in a negative way?
Putting some pressure on EA to change their easily exploitable system that's attracting these criminal elements. Which needs to happen. Maybe it will next year, because EA's certainly not gonna shut down and redesign the thing when it means cutting off an active revenue stream.
@Stepto said:
The second is really about social engineering. I think that’s a fairly well understood space, even though there’s not a whole lot, in general, that can be done from a product standpoint, as much as there is from a user education standpoint, trying to be careful about your personal information and when you give that out.
Think he misunderstood this one. The concern is about customer support being tricked into giving out information, not the user.
He should know about stuff like that since if customer support doesn't ask the user to verify with this secondary proof, then it's useless in this context.