I appreciate the effort of you guys trying to argue the zealots, but it's pointless. You can bring up well-researched evidence, concede many points and respect their most absurd ideas as truth, they will never compromise on their loony ideology. Even here where it's clearly in question whether this statue was truly sexist or not [unless males are by birthright unable to decide what is or isn't sexist] these couple clowns come in and completely destroy any previous conversation, amiable or otherwise. Just best to ignore and move on with your lives.However, I do think this comment section got out-of-hand. I don't know what the complaints even were, but it's boiling down to just an aggravation with these sorts of articles. All I can recommend is that Patrick tries to balance his articles better, at least attempt to find differing opinions [no, this does not mean finding sexists for the 'against,' fuck off] and if he can try to avoid making a feminist / sexist article unless it's relevant? I doubt he'd agree to that and I don't think he'll change his approach much, to be fair this article is not badly-written or overly-opinionated from the author's point of view, the fact it's quite biased and arguably needless is a far harder point to argue to Patrick than before, when it was his spelling, grammar, syntax, etcetera in question. So this most likely isn't going to get resolved.