Why is shit like this allowed to happen?

I was checking a game that I remember enjoying but everyone else hating, and out of interest I checked it's Giant Bomb wiki page.
 
http://www.giantbomb.com/driver-parallel-lines/61-17604/     
 
Really? The same text is repeated twice with bad grammar, and the rest is just copy and pasted straight from Wikipedia. And this has been there for God knows who long. There should be some sort of edit history feature like on Wikipedia to see who has done what. I'm sure I'm coming off as a jerk here, but again: really?  
 
You might say "just edit it yourself", but it was years ago I played that game and I don't really remember much of it, so I probably wouldn't be qualified to write anything about it. 
 
End of semi-rant. 
 
EDIT: Someone has now filled out he article with original content and made it miles better than before. Big kudos to that person, but this does not solve the problem in general. I will repeat what i said in my posts below. If  you have a wiki history open for everyone to see it would encourage people to think a little more before they make their edits. I think this would be a step forward to a better wiki.

it's not. the top editor (who i'll assume wrote that page) has 1,000+ wiki points so his submission wasn't moderated. you can try to put up a wiki task here to get someone to fix that mess of a page 

" it's not. the top editor (who i'll assume wrote that page) has 1,000+ wiki points so his submission wasn't moderated. you can try to put up a wiki task here to get someone to fix that mess of a page  "

Maybe this was the orginal content and noone else really has the experience/knowledge to edit it to something proper? But just correct his grammar and ta-da, free wiki points.

There are unfortunately some very poor pages on the Wiki.  There's this one page I always happen onto by accident that makes me angry every single time I see it because it's basically written like a poorly-worded review and is the worst thing ever.  But I can never remember which one it is. :(
 
The point is, lazy assholes want easy points.

" There are unfortunately some very poor pages on the Wiki.  There's this one page I always happen onto by accident that makes me angry every single time I see it because it's basically written like a poorly-worded review and is the worst thing ever.  But I can never remember which one it is. :(  The point is, lazy assholes want easy points. "

Yo just saying. I don't think Josseppie and the 2nd rated guy on that page did it. They both uploaded a bunch of images. And It was probably done back when images got you more than 1 point.

" Further strengthening the point of a wiki history. The admins/mods most likely have it, but when you have a wiki history open for everyone to see it would encourage people to think a little more before they make their edits.  "

Wikipedia directly copied practically everything they have on their Catherine page from ours.  Even though it's not likely in this case, maybe someone on Wikipedia copied the page you linked as well? 
 
But I agree completely, a public edit history of a page for every user is a necessity and it's surprising it hasn't been implemented yet.

" There should be some sort of edit history feature like on Wikipedia to see who has done what. "

I smell corruption of the highest level... 
Nah, but it's still strange. Something seems very wrong with that page.

I don't think you are being a jerk by pointing out that the rules aren't being enforced in a timely or consistent manner. I know the site relies largely on user reports for these things, but as this case illustrates, not all pages get seen, and that's not really okay if we want to be a serious source of information. Wikipedia gets this kind of moderation done somehow. I know everyone who works on the site is busy, but things like this never seem to get much of a response from any knowledgeable party. 

I remember the 1st and last (for now) wiki edit I made took me hours to do, and it should have only taken me 20mins tops.

We're aware that wiki history should be in the wiki.  It's the #1 thing we want to fix ( add back in ) into wikid when we rebuild the wikid tools.