California authorities seize computers of Gizmodo editor

Avatar image for the_laughing_man
The_Laughing_Man

13807

Forum Posts

7460

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By The_Laughing_Man

Armed with a warrant, California's Rapid Enforcement Allied Computer Team entered Gizmodo editor Jason Chen's home last week and seized four computers and two servers in its felony investigation of an obtained prototype iPhone.

Gizmodo revealed the information, along with a copy of the warrant issued by a judge of the superior court in San Mateo County, Calif. In response, the website's post argued that it believes the warrant was invalid under section 1524(g) of the California Penal Code.

The warrant states that there was probable cause that Chen's computers were "used as the means of committing a felony." The REACT authorities entered Chen's home without him present, according to Gizmodo.

A full inventory of the seized material includes a MacBook, MacBook Pro, 32GB iPad, 16GB iPhone, an AirPort Extreme, IBM ThinkPad, a Dell desktop, external hard drives, and many more. The items were removed from numerous rooms in his home.

An account of the events by Chen was also filed. The Gizmodo editor said he and his wife came back home from dinner around 9:45 p.m. when they noticed their garage door was half-open. When he tried to open the door, officers searched him and informed him that his property was under their control.

Chen's front door was reportedly broken open so the authorities could enter, and those on the scene informed him that he could be reimbursed for the damage. Chen was provided with a copy of the warrant, and declined to comment to the authorities. He was not arrested.

Last week it was revealed that police are investigating the Gizmodo purchase of a prototype iPhone from Apple. The publication's parent company, Gawker Media, has openly admitted it paid $5,000 to obtain the device from a man who claimed he found it at a California bar.

The prototype handset was allegedly left at the Redwood City, Calif., establishment by an Apple engineer. The employee frantically searched for the device, calling the bar multiple times to see if it had been returned, but the owner of the bar said no one ever contacted him to say they had found an iPhone. Gizmodo claimed that the person who found the phone attempted to call Apple and did not receive a response.

Gizmodo returned the iPhone to Apple after the Cupertino, Calif., company requested it be given back, but not before the publication wrote numerous stories about the device and revealed the name of the engineer who allegedly lost the device. The website also disassembled the hardware to confirm it was manufactured by Apple.

   SOURCE 
 
Thoughts?  
 
Avatar image for organicalistic_
Organicalistic_

3092

Forum Posts

391

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By Organicalistic_

i made one of these

Avatar image for the_laughing_man
The_Laughing_Man

13807

Forum Posts

7460

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By The_Laughing_Man
@organicalistic_ said:

" i made one of these "

I did a search and nothing turned up. Searched "Gizmodo"  
 
 
Ahhh I see now. You did not include the name in the title.
Avatar image for whisperkill
Whisperkill

3044

Forum Posts

293

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 11

#4  Edited By Whisperkill

yeah. Apple are notorious for this kind of stuff...

Avatar image for ryanwho
ryanwho

12011

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By ryanwho

So I guess it wasn't a viral campaign after all. But it seems redundant to do this after everything already leaked into the public sphere. You just stole a bunch of info found easily on the net and some porn with this seige.

Avatar image for kaosangel-DELETED
KaosAngel

14251

Forum Posts

6507

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 3

#6  Edited By KaosAngel

Good.  I hate Gizmodo, bunch of kids.  Weren't they the ones who used the TV-B-Gone at CES?
 
I hope Kotaku does something stupid next so they get nailed too.

Avatar image for the_laughing_man
The_Laughing_Man

13807

Forum Posts

7460

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By The_Laughing_Man
@ryanwho said:
" So I guess it wasn't a viral campaign after all. But it seems redundant to do this after everything already leaked into the public sphere. You just stole a bunch of info found easily on the net and some porn with this seige. "
Its more or less about the theft. And the pulling apart the item..then returning it. 
Avatar image for bionicicide
Bionicicide

1230

Forum Posts

24

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By Bionicicide
@KaosAngel said:
" Good.  I hate Gizmodo, bunch of kids.  Weren't they the ones who used the TV-B-Gone at CES?  I hope Kotaku does something stupid next so they get nailed too. "
Never heard of that stunt before, but YouTubing confirms it. No sympathy from me.
Avatar image for the_laughing_man
The_Laughing_Man

13807

Forum Posts

7460

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By The_Laughing_Man
@KaosAngel said:
" Good.  I hate Gizmodo, bunch of kids.  Weren't they the ones who used the TV-B-Gone at CES?  I hope Kotaku does something stupid next so they get nailed too. "

No Caption Provided
Avatar image for kaosangel-DELETED
KaosAngel

14251

Forum Posts

6507

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 3

#10  Edited By KaosAngel
@The_Laughing_Man: Seriously, they aren't journalist.  The difference between Engadget and Gizmodo is that Engadget knows they aren't journalist and are bloggers (but they put out stuff that real journalists do), Gizmodo thinks they're journalists but act like fucking kids.  It's the same deal with Joystiq/Destructoid and Kotaku (at least Destructoid knows full well who and what they are and do it with amazingly comedy).  
 
You buy stolen shit, you go to jail.  God damn idiots, they're bloggers and nothing more.  I can't wait to see the way they spin this and the way Gizmodo readers will go like "APPLE IS AN EVIL CORPORATION" when it's the federal system taking care of it and not Apple.  Crime is a crime, and when you do stupid shit like this expect the full force of the federal task force.
Avatar image for the_laughing_man
The_Laughing_Man

13807

Forum Posts

7460

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11  Edited By The_Laughing_Man
@KaosAngel said:

" @The_Laughing_Man: Seriously, they aren't journalist.  The difference between Engadget and Gizmodo is that Engadget knows they aren't journalist and are bloggers (but they put out stuff that real journalists do), Gizmodo thinks they're journalists but act like fucking kids.  It's the same deal with Joystiq/Destructoid and Kotaku (at least Destructoid knows full well who and what they are and do it with amazingly comedy).    You buy stolen shit, you go to jail.  God damn idiots, they're bloggers and nothing more.  I can't wait to see the way they spin this and the way Gizmodo readers will go like "APPLE IS AN EVIL CORPORATION" when it's the federal system taking care of it and not Apple.  Crime is a crime, and when you do stupid shit like this expect the full force of the federal task force. "

They are trying to protect him under the " he is a journalist" thing. Im sure apple will crush him.  
 
I still think they went way to far by taking the phone apart. 
Avatar image for dany
Dany

8019

Forum Posts

416

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#12  Edited By Dany

They are idiots, seeing this comic strips just remind me how unprofessional these press people are. They respond antagonistic commentators with an antagonistic response. They are immature for that line of work.
 
 
 

Avatar image for jimbo
Jimbo

10472

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#13  Edited By Jimbo

Even game names aren't as contrived as Rapid Enforcement Allied Computer Team.  Why don't they just stick a "3" in there and be done with it?  
 
"Don't worry ma'am!  I'm from the Rapid Enforcement *mumble mumble mumble*..."

Avatar image for the_laughing_man
The_Laughing_Man

13807

Forum Posts

7460

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By The_Laughing_Man
@Dany said:
" They are idiots, seeing this comic strips just remind me how unprofessional these press people are. They respond antagonistic commentators with an antagonistic response. They are immature for that line of work.
 
 
  "
Have they done anything useful? Anything at all?
Avatar image for leetballa
LeetBalla

731

Forum Posts

133

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

#15  Edited By LeetBalla
@KaosAngel said:
" @The_Laughing_Man: Seriously, they aren't journalist.  The difference between Engadget and Gizmodo is that Engadget knows they aren't journalist and are bloggers (but they put out stuff that real journalists do), Gizmodo thinks they're journalists but act like fucking kids.  It's the same deal with Joystiq/Destructoid and Kotaku (at least Destructoid knows full well who and what they are and do it with amazingly comedy).    You buy stolen shit, you go to jail.  God damn idiots, they're bloggers and nothing more.  I can't wait to see the way they spin this and the way Gizmodo readers will go like "APPLE IS AN EVIL CORPORATION" when it's the federal system taking care of it and not Apple.  Crime is a crime, and when you do stupid shit like this expect the full force of the federal task force. "
I agree with you for the most part, but Destructoid doesn't know when to stop. Also, Jim Sterling is one of the dumbest fucks on the internet.
Avatar image for the_laughing_man
The_Laughing_Man

13807

Forum Posts

7460

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16  Edited By The_Laughing_Man
@LeetBalla said:
" @KaosAngel said:
" @The_Laughing_Man: Seriously, they aren't journalist.  The difference between Engadget and Gizmodo is that Engadget knows they aren't journalist and are bloggers (but they put out stuff that real journalists do), Gizmodo thinks they're journalists but act like fucking kids.  It's the same deal with Joystiq/Destructoid and Kotaku (at least Destructoid knows full well who and what they are and do it with amazingly comedy).    You buy stolen shit, you go to jail.  God damn idiots, they're bloggers and nothing more.  I can't wait to see the way they spin this and the way Gizmodo readers will go like "APPLE IS AN EVIL CORPORATION" when it's the federal system taking care of it and not Apple.  Crime is a crime, and when you do stupid shit like this expect the full force of the federal task force. "
I agree with you for the most part, but Destructoid doesn't know when to stop. Also, Jim Sterling is one of the dumbest fucks on the internet. "
That TV thing...I did stuff like that when I was like...5..and got bored of it after like..two times...
Avatar image for kaosangel-DELETED
KaosAngel

14251

Forum Posts

6507

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 3

#17  Edited By KaosAngel
@LeetBalla said:
" I agree with you for the most part, but Destructoid doesn't know when to stop. Also, Jim Sterling is one of the dumbest fucks on the internet. "
I find Jim's stuff hilarious.  They know they're bloggers and know gaming has a comedy side.  His DOA Paradise review was brilliant!  I don't care much about Heavy Rain, as I feel everyone has their own opinion on HR, but his Deadly Premonition Review made me buy the game....well before Giant Bomb, and I would not be surprised if most hype for Deadly premotion came from Jim.
Avatar image for mo0
Mo0

66

Forum Posts

247

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18  Edited By Mo0
@The_Laughing_Man said:
" @KaosAngel said:

" @The_Laughing_Man: Seriously, they aren't journalist.  The difference between Engadget and Gizmodo is that Engadget knows they aren't journalist and are bloggers (but they put out stuff that real journalists do), Gizmodo thinks they're journalists but act like fucking kids.  It's the same deal with Joystiq/Destructoid and Kotaku (at least Destructoid knows full well who and what they are and do it with amazingly comedy).    You buy stolen shit, you go to jail.  God damn idiots, they're bloggers and nothing more.  I can't wait to see the way they spin this and the way Gizmodo readers will go like "APPLE IS AN EVIL CORPORATION" when it's the federal system taking care of it and not Apple.  Crime is a crime, and when you do stupid shit like this expect the full force of the federal task force. "

They are trying to protect him under the " he is a journalist" thing. Im sure apple will crush him.   I still think they went way to far by taking the phone apart.  "
Last I checked, doesn't "he's a journalist" only apply when he refuses to reveal his source anyway?  I don't think anyone's allowed to buy stolen goods, whether it's for a story or not, and under California law when he bought it knowing that there was a name attached to it, it was stolen propety.
Avatar image for the_laughing_man
The_Laughing_Man

13807

Forum Posts

7460

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19  Edited By The_Laughing_Man
@Mo0 said:
" @The_Laughing_Man said:
" @KaosAngel said:

" @The_Laughing_Man: Seriously, they aren't journalist.  The difference between Engadget and Gizmodo is that Engadget knows they aren't journalist and are bloggers (but they put out stuff that real journalists do), Gizmodo thinks they're journalists but act like fucking kids.  It's the same deal with Joystiq/Destructoid and Kotaku (at least Destructoid knows full well who and what they are and do it with amazingly comedy).    You buy stolen shit, you go to jail.  God damn idiots, they're bloggers and nothing more.  I can't wait to see the way they spin this and the way Gizmodo readers will go like "APPLE IS AN EVIL CORPORATION" when it's the federal system taking care of it and not Apple.  Crime is a crime, and when you do stupid shit like this expect the full force of the federal task force. "

They are trying to protect him under the " he is a journalist" thing. Im sure apple will crush him.   I still think they went way to far by taking the phone apart.  "
Last I checked, doesn't "he's a journalist" only apply when he refuses to reveal his source anyway?  I don't think anyone's allowed to buy stolen goods, whether it's for a story or not, and under California law when he bought it knowing that there was a name attached to it, it was stolen propety. "
Like I said hes trying to hide under it.  
 
They also seized a letter from someone who sent said letter to show the police if they come after his stuff. Which I found funny.