Avatar image for christopherson329
Posted by christopherson329 (308 posts) 3 years, 11 days ago

Poll: Did Sony go to E3 and was just like my PS4 a 100 dollars cheaper than the XBONE (131 votes)

Yes 25%
No 44%
Possibly 31%

Does any one think sony came to E3 with out a price for PS4 and just said make it cheaper than the xbox

Avatar image for boom_goes_the_dynamite
#1 Posted by Boom_goes_the_dynamite (922 posts) -

I get a feeling they had an idea for a price, at least a range, but weren't expecting Microsoft to announce their price. As a result Sony saw a way to further twist the knife and added it to their conference.

Avatar image for turtlebird95
#2 Edited by Turtlebird95 (3615 posts) -

What?

Edit: Ah, had to reread that a few times. (Tired) I think they went into e3 knowing exactly what price they were shooting for.

Avatar image for awesomeusername
#3 Posted by awesomeusername (4586 posts) -

After rereading your question, I'm confused. I'll just say that they said they knew the price going into E3.

Avatar image for mrpandaman
#4 Edited by mrpandaman (942 posts) -

After rereading your question, I'm confused.

But I think I get it... They had a range of prices going in and had the benefit of going last so they could be a little more reactionary. I think Sony was going to say a price regardless and MS might've sensed that they were going to. MS was probably attempting to get a little ahead as they might have thought Sony was going to announce a similar price probably $450-$500, not expecting a full $100 lower.

Avatar image for selfconfessedcynic
#5 Edited by selfconfessedcynic (2937 posts) -

I think they had a number of prices in mind and chose the best response possible to pretty much completely destroy the Xbox's momentum.

I like Hip Hop Gamer's summary "It was biblical."

Avatar image for justin258
#6 Posted by Justin258 (13851 posts) -

At worst, they had two or three different price points set to announce and a line ready in the conference for the announcement.

But no, I don't think big corporations with millions of dollars invested into a single piece of hardware finalize its price over the afternoon of a major press event.

Avatar image for nekusakuraba
#7 Edited by NekuSakuraba (7807 posts) -

According to Jack Tretton they knew the price was going to be $400 before Xbox announced their price. I believe it as well, because even I knew the PS4 would be cheaper due to the exclusion of the camera in the bundle.

Avatar image for fearbeard
#8 Edited by Fearbeard (870 posts) -

No... they decided their price 7 years ago when the $599 price for the PS3 was met with such derision.

To be fair Microsoft could also have met the $399 price if they didn't include Kinect.

Avatar image for hellknightleon
#9 Edited by HellknightLeon (489 posts) -

I think they had a price but was ready to make a change based off xbox. What that was we will never know... point is I think they had that all set up. They are ready for a fight and we can all see that.

Avatar image for daniel94
#10 Posted by Daniel94 (15 posts) -

They just went to put his viral video about lending games.

Avatar image for awesomeusername
#11 Edited by awesomeusername (4586 posts) -

@mrpandaman: In the dump truck interview with Scott Rohde's, Scott said that since 2009 they had wanted to make the PS4 powerful yet affordable. I think he said $400 is what they wanted. Also, I think it was Geoff Keighley's interview with Jack Tretton, Jack said that they knew that $400 would be the price. Just saw what @nekusakuraba said a couple posts above so I'm right. They knew there price going in.

Avatar image for jazgalaxy
#12 Posted by JazGalaxy (1638 posts) -

I think they decided at the show. That's what Jeff Gerstman and other journalists have been saying the scuttle is.

They likely had several different scenarios worked out and when MS spit out their price, they went "execute the one where we're 100 dollars cheaper".

It's actually a very similar situation as what happened with the PS1 at E3 many, many years ago when they did their infamous 100 dollar price cut of the Sega Saturn.

Sony, this year, is looking a lot like Sony of the PS1 era, and that is a very, very, very good thing for gamers.

Avatar image for kirkpipeline
#13 Posted by kirkpipeline (26 posts) -

It almost feels like everything Sony does and says is a direct reaction to what Microsoft is doing. After MS fuked up the way they did Sony switched the market strategy to "PS4 - it's not the Xbox".

Avatar image for mrpandaman
#14 Posted by mrpandaman (942 posts) -

@mrpandaman: In the dump truck interview with Scott Rohde's, Scott said that since 2009 they had wanted to make the PS4 powerful yet affordable. I think he said $400 is what they wanted. Also, I think it was Geoff Keighley's interview with Jack Tretton, Jack said that they knew that $400 would be the price. Just saw what @nekusakuraba said a couple posts above so I'm right. They knew there price going in.

I know they said that, but they could be just saying that to be consistent with their post-event messaging. It's more likely they had a range to work with to be reactionary and that's something they would not admit to. As Jeff and Patrick had heard from other sources, Sony did not decide on the final price until before the show and possibly until they had a positive feeling on what the Xbox One's price was going to be. Sony was ready to react to whatever MS was going to do within a range.

Avatar image for TechnoSyndrome
#15 Posted by TechnoSyndrome (1263 posts) -

No, I'm sure whatever they thought was in proper English.

Avatar image for shadowconqueror
#16 Posted by ShadowConqueror (3413 posts) -

No. And your thread title doesn't make sense.

Avatar image for hunter5024
#17 Edited by Hunter5024 (6656 posts) -

I think they knew the price, but I think announcing it as early as they did was a reaction to Microsoft's price point. They've said they knew the price beforehand, and I don't see what they gain from lying about that. I can understand why they might say "Oh we never even considered used game drm." because even though it's probably not true, it makes them look good. I don't really see how having the price set in stone makes them look good.

Avatar image for deanoxd
#18 Edited by DeanoXD (689 posts) -

In the interview Patrick did with Sony guy, he said they set a price point during the original development of the PS4 and that they wanted a $400 console at release. And it was not a reaction to MS

Avatar image for awesomeusername
#19 Edited by awesomeusername (4586 posts) -

@awesomeusername said:

@mrpandaman: In the dump truck interview with Scott Rohde's, Scott said that since 2009 they had wanted to make the PS4 powerful yet affordable. I think he said $400 is what they wanted. Also, I think it was Geoff Keighley's interview with Jack Tretton, Jack said that they knew that $400 would be the price. Just saw what @nekusakuraba said a couple posts above so I'm right. They knew there price going in.

I know they said that, but they could be just saying that to be consistent with their post-event messaging. It's more likely they had a range to work with to be reactionary and that's something they would not admit to. As Jeff and Patrick had heard from other sources, Sony did not decide on the final price until before the show and possibly until they had a positive feeling on what the Xbox One's price was going to be. Sony was ready to react to whatever MS was going to do within a range.

Could have happened like that but no one will know for sure. It makes sense though.

Avatar image for tycobb
#20 Posted by TyCobb (2023 posts) -

No. And your thread title doesn't make sense.

It was very confusing the first few times I read it. Finally got it.

Did Sony go to E3 without a price and was like "Our PS4 is $100 cheaper!".

Still wouldn't word it quite like that, but it should clarify his thread title for others that got confused.

Avatar image for thesoutherndandy
#21 Posted by TheSouthernDandy (4090 posts) -

I would bet a lot of the decisions Sony has made were made pretty recently in reaction to MS.

Avatar image for jimbo
#22 Edited by Jimbo (10447 posts) -

I think companies like this usually have some people smart enough to be thinking more than one move ahead. I also suspect each of these companies have enough inside sources to know basically everything that's happening at the other company - I doubt there are too many surprises for either of them.