Posted by Sweep (8861 posts) -

I have been loving the Encyclopaedia Bombastica videos that Jeff is churning out at the moment so, as I'm too hungover to leave my house right now, I decided to throw together a Giant Bomb parody of the classic Encyclopaedia Britannica logo. I'm just going to leave it here, for you to look at with your eyes.

EDIT: I didn't realise that had not only thought up this idea but also visualised it way fucking better than me so, y'know.... shit.

Love ya' Buzzy!

Thanks For Reading

Love Sweep

Moderator
#1 Posted by Sweep (8861 posts) -

I have been loving the Encyclopaedia Bombastica videos that Jeff is churning out at the moment so, as I'm too hungover to leave my house right now, I decided to throw together a Giant Bomb parody of the classic Encyclopaedia Britannica logo. I'm just going to leave it here, for you to look at with your eyes.

EDIT: I didn't realise that had not only thought up this idea but also visualised it way fucking better than me so, y'know.... shit.

Love ya' Buzzy!

Thanks For Reading

Love Sweep

Moderator
#2 Posted by Tylea002 (2295 posts) -

@Sweep: I would wear that yes right now thank you k.

#3 Posted by slowbird (1706 posts) -

that's not how you spell encyclopedia.

#4 Posted by Sweep (8861 posts) -

@slowbird: I couldn't be bothered to figure out how you do the little a+e digivolve fuckin' thing and, also, fuck you slowbird!

Moderator
#5 Posted by csl316 (8675 posts) -
I'm looking with both of my eyes with reverence.
 
@slowbird: That's how Encyclopædia Britannica spells encyclopedia.
#6 Posted by Hizang (8532 posts) -

Nice design Sweep, looks great.

#7 Posted by JZ (2125 posts) -

Looks too christmasy for a all year logo

#8 Posted by Snail (8606 posts) -

It sucks, Sweep.

Nah I'm kidding, it's gorgeous.

#9 Posted by Murtaug (308 posts) -

The design looks good, nice job.

I do have to agree with that it does look quite Cristmasy.

#10 Edited by slowbird (1706 posts) -

@slowbird: @csl316: yeah I looked it up and thought, "meh they're probably both valid but I'ma troll Sweep anyways."

Nice design, though!

#11 Posted by Phatmac (5726 posts) -

I like it Sweepy. :)

#12 Posted by AlexW00d (6275 posts) -

@slowbird: It is how you spell encyclopaedia, and it always has been how you spell it. Americans just choose to spell it without the A, 'cause I dunno, a hatred of Latin or something.

#13 Posted by RazielCuts (2954 posts) -

For reference here's the Encyclopedia Britannica logo -

I think you got it pretty spot on British Encyclopaedia @slowbird so it's spelt right.

#14 Posted by Sweep (8861 posts) -

Yay for spelling!

Moderator
#15 Posted by slowbird (1706 posts) -

@AlexW00d: @RazielCuts: @Sweep: YAY FOR TAKING A JOKE.

#16 Posted by bibamatt (1088 posts) -

Nailed it!

#17 Posted by CitizenKane (10506 posts) -

@Sweep said:

Yay for spelling!

You crazy Brits and your spelling.

#18 Posted by JoeyRavn (4974 posts) -

Wait, what? The Brits got an encyclopedia? Yeah, sure. About what? Tea?

PS: Nice one, Sweep.

#19 Posted by Fattony12000 (7416 posts) -

Iteth Beth Britanish Engeland Speeling.

#20 Posted by HistoryInRust (6315 posts) -

Why not, instead of the thistle, don't you put Luchadeer at the bottom with his antlers branching in spindly fingers up to each side, and have the Bombface nestled in the middle? Why keep the thistle at all?

#21 Posted by ArtisanBreads (3835 posts) -

@HistoryInRust said:

Why not, instead of the thistle, don't you put Luchadeer at the bottom with his antlers branching in spindly fingers up to each side, and have the Bombface nestled in the middle? Why keep the thistle at all?

This man knows what he's talking about.

#22 Posted by Chaser324 (6546 posts) -

Good job, Sweep. However, I think I slightly prefer the one that did a few months ago. Take a look.

Moderator
#23 Posted by HistoryInRust (6315 posts) -

@Chaser324 said:

Good job, Sweep. However, I think I slightly prefer the one that did a few months ago. Take a look.

Bahaha. Welp. Life finds a way.

#24 Posted by Sweep (8861 posts) -

@Chaser324 said:

Good job, Sweep. However, I think I slightly prefer the one that did a few months ago. Take a look.

Goddammit, I knew that it was too easy. Yeah, that's way fucking better.

You win this time, Buzz...

Moderator
#25 Edited by jakob187 (21671 posts) -

@Sweep said:

@slowbird: I couldn't be bothered to figure out how you do the little a+e digivolve fuckin' thing and, also, fuck you slowbird!

THAT'S OUR SWEEP!

#26 Posted by ZombiePie (5672 posts) -

@CitizenKane said:

@Sweep said:

Yay for spelling!

You crazy Brits and your spelling.

These sorts of spelling errors is why Britain lost its empire.

That and y'all need Jesus.

Moderator
#27 Edited by Soap (3592 posts) -

Buzz wins, flawless victory.

.........<3

#28 Posted by TheVeteran13 (1210 posts) -

@csl316 said:

I'm looking with both of my eyes with reverence.

@slowbird: That's how Encyclopædia Britannica spells encyclopedia.

That's not how Encyclopedia Brown spells encyclopedia... so I think we can all agree which one is right.

#29 Posted by Red12b (9084 posts) -
@Sweep

@Chaser324 said:

Good job, Sweep. However, I think I slightly prefer the one that did a few months ago. Take a look.

Goddammit, I knew that it was too easy. Yeah, that's way fucking better.

You win this time, Buzz...

@ZombiePie

@CitizenKane said:

@Sweep said:

Yay for spelling!

You crazy Brits and your spelling.

These sorts of spelling errors is why Britain lost its empire.

That and y'all need Jesus.

And the next time and the time after that...

I'm saying give up while your ego is intact.


church of england wut