• 108 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#1 Posted by CollyWolly (65 posts) -

What do you think?  Would the quality of the forums improve or not?  If the last two days are any indication, I predict the quality would increase substantially.
#2 Posted by HolyCrapItsAdam (448 posts) -

no. Why would they segregate the community just cause somebody pays for HD video?

#3 Posted by CL60 (16906 posts) -

No, no, no ,no ,no...NO.

#4 Posted by Dany (7887 posts) -
@CL60 said:
" No, no, no ,no ,no...NO. "
#5 Posted by zombie2011 (5048 posts) -

No, and no.

#6 Posted by General_D23 (1201 posts) -
@Dany said:
" @CL60 said:
" No, no, no ,no ,no...NO. "
"
Online
#7 Posted by leebmx (2235 posts) -

Don't feed the trolls...

#8 Posted by Colin (707 posts) -
@General_D23 said:
" @Dany said:
" @CL60 said:
" No, no, no ,no ,no...NO. "
"
"
#9 Posted by MattyFTM (14432 posts) -

That's not going to happen. Dave has specifically said that they are not going to split the community by providing subscriber only forums. And quite right too. You can't go splitting the community like that.

Moderator
#10 Posted by CaptainObvious (3000 posts) -

#11 Posted by Feanor (1391 posts) -
@CollyWolly: You should stop trying to troll.
#12 Posted by GioVANNI (1293 posts) -

Yeah, let's split up the community even MORE.

#13 Posted by FirePrince (1766 posts) -

My fiery rage increases when every single one of you opens their mouth. 
 Also,NO.
#14 Posted by MasturbatingBear (1781 posts) -
#15 Posted by gosukiller (2325 posts) -

Uhm, no? 
Where do you even get the crazy idea of 'subscriber = quality posts'? 

#16 Posted by FluxWaveZ (19388 posts) -

What?  There are also a bunch of asshole users who are members.  IGN Insider exclusive forums prove why this wouldn't work.

#17 Posted by supermike6 (3641 posts) -

NOOOO That is the worst thing!

#18 Posted by Tebbit (4485 posts) -
@gosukiller said:
" Uhm, no?  Where do you even get the crazy idea of 'subscriber = quality posts'?  "
Probably from me. You'll notice my posts are of a consistently high quality. The reason? Well... I'll leave that for you to decide. 
 
Also: No! That would be horrible!
#19 Posted by BraveToaster (12588 posts) -

I think this is a great idea!

#20 Posted by ZeForgotten (10397 posts) -

It's not gonna happen, even if you think that it would make the forums a better place. 
I thought getting rid of anyone who was 14 and below on these forums would make it a better place too, at some point. 
Then I was told that it wasn't gonna happen, then I found out it was people in their 30s acting like 14 year olds, who knew?

#21 Posted by empfeix (774 posts) -

Yes please.  Then hopefully the rest of us can be left alone.

#22 Posted by Gamer_152 (14109 posts) -

Absolutely not. That is exactly the kind of thing that would mean that the subscription service would split the community.

Moderator
#23 Posted by MordeaniisChaos (5730 posts) -
@CollyWolly said:
" What do you think?  Would the quality of the forums improve or not?  If the last two days are any indication, I predict the quality would increase substantially. "
 You are the scourge of the fucking internet. You are the worst kind of person. Seriously. No. Having money does not make you a better fucking person. What the hell? If that would work, Xbox Live would have nothing but mature, respectful, fun loving people online. But instead its filled with assholes, elitists, and douches. And I am going to subscribe today. So I'm not saying this because I don't want to miss out.
#24 Posted by trophyhunter (5800 posts) -

Someone bought a 50 dollar ego trip.

#25 Posted by leebmx (2235 posts) -
@MordeaniisChaos said:
" @CollyWolly said:
" What do you think?  Would the quality of the forums improve or not?  If the last two days are any indication, I predict the quality would increase substantially. "
 You are the scourge of the fucking internet. You are the worst kind of person. Seriously. No. Having money does not make you a better fucking person. What the hell? If that would work, Xbox Live would have nothing but mature, respectful, fun loving people online. But instead its filled with assholes, elitists, and douches. And I am going to subscribe today. So I'm not saying this because I don't want to miss out. "
I think he is winding you up........and I think it has worked
#26 Posted by InFamous91 (931 posts) -

lmao Hell No!

#27 Posted by Steve_C (1757 posts) -

I think Dave needs to build Giantest Bomb for subscribers only. They don't deserve to mingle with us filth directly or view our shoddily written content.

#28 Posted by Clark (110 posts) -

No

#29 Posted by LordXavierBritish (6320 posts) -

What is the point on restricting who sees a post?

#30 Posted by Atomasist (2818 posts) -

Yes, yes, yes, yes, YES!

#31 Posted by LordAndrew (14430 posts) -

Improved community interaction ;-)

#32 Posted by AjayRaz (12476 posts) -
@Atomasist said:
" Yes, yes, yes, yes, YES! "
Online
#33 Posted by Daveyo520 (6997 posts) -

Why would you want to segregate us and cause even more problems?

#34 Posted by ZimboDK (843 posts) -

I think I may have actually suggested that in the suggestions thread that Dave made. After thinking about it though, I realize it's a fucking terrible idea. I don't see the point of it at all.

#35 Posted by Mesklinite (815 posts) -
@CL60 said:
"No, no, no ,no ,no... Fuck NO. "

This.
#36 Edited by gla55jAw (2695 posts) -

Wow. I didn't think of that. Why would I want to talk to any of you "regular" folks anyway. Count me in! MEDALS 4 LYFE SON!

#37 Posted by Nekroskop (2786 posts) -

That's a terrible idea, OP. 

#38 Edited by Tactical_Kill (1695 posts) -

What are you? An idiot?  
 
NO! This is a horrible idea.

#39 Posted by Ravenousrattler (1417 posts) -

i know your not serious, dave has said many times its never happening

#40 Posted by Noodles (539 posts) -
@Axxol said:
" I think this is a great idea! "
#41 Posted by Noodles (539 posts) -

Keep feeding the troll!

#42 Posted by BraveToaster (12588 posts) -
@Daveyo520 said:
" Why would you want to segregate us and cause even more problems? "
Because segregation is fun.
#43 Posted by Djeffers03 (2545 posts) -

Absolutely not. The whole idea was to offer a subscription that didn't split the community.

#44 Posted by Zidd (1857 posts) -

Dave specifically said that they were not doing that.

#45 Posted by TheRedOne (5 posts) -

That would work except for all the people who assume a membership includes the right to be an even bigger dick. And all the other reasons why it would never work, see John Gabriel's Greater Internet Dickwad Theory.

#46 Posted by CollyWolly (65 posts) -

I wasn't clear, and I apologize.  I wasn't talking about creaing an exclusive forum section for subsribers only.  I meant: "How do you think the quality of ALL forums would change if only subscribers could post?"
#47 Edited by Potter9156 (944 posts) -

How about a separate, hidden, forum only for those who constantly spew "Youtube spam!" and 4chan memes in every thread? Hmm. And they can never leave it. I like this idea. 

#48 Posted by Atomasist (2818 posts) -
@Axxol said:
" @Daveyo520 said:
" Why would you want to segregate us and cause even more problems? "
Because segregation is fun. "
I hate being in a forum with those vile paid members, they disgust me.
#49 Edited by Duffman (208 posts) -

People with money =/= People with intelligence (or manners).  There's no difference between the quality of posts from those that paid than those that didn't.

#50 Posted by BetonneTom (113 posts) -

whatever happend to givin dudes a bit of your money because they have given you a lot of video's and pretty articles over the last couple of years.  
 
all this talking about things!