Future Total War Title TBA This Year, but in Another Expo

Avatar image for mocbucket62
MocBucket62

2689

Forum Posts

1106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 7

#1  Edited By MocBucket62

I just read an article today that The Creative Assembly will announce the new Total War game at a video game expo that's not E3. There will be a sneak peek of the new Total War title at a PC/Indie game show called Rezzed , sponsered by Eurogamer.net. I know, I'm pretty disappointed that there's a 99% chance of not seeing what the new Total War game is at E3, but I'm happy that the possibility of Total War: Rome 2 being announced this year is coming. They may show something new like World War II Total War, which is something I personally don't want, but we'll see at Rezzed. 
 
EDIT: BTW, REZZED starts on July 6th if you all wanted to know when it starts. ALso I realized that this should be in the Total War Forums, so I'll start a topic under those forums.

Avatar image for jelekeloy
jelekeloy

469

Forum Posts

92

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

#2  Edited By jelekeloy

I thought the title was implying that there would be a futuristic Total War game. That is a game I would like to see.

Avatar image for shanedev
ShaneDev

1703

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#3  Edited By ShaneDev

I do wonder where they go now and what they can add thats new. I would hope they add a little more strategy to the campaign map and I hope it something new and not another redo of their old games.

Avatar image for mocbucket62
MocBucket62

2689

Forum Posts

1106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 7

#4  Edited By MocBucket62
@ShaneDev: I would actually like to see this, Greece: Total War. This isn't really like Rome where the Greeks are represented as the Greek Cities, but have each city state be a different faction. Like you can play as the Spartans and have them battle against the Persian forces in the Battle of Thermopylae. It can even go from ancient Greece's beginnings to Alexander's empire (Yes I know they did that with Rome Total War Alexander, but they can improve from that with this). 
Avatar image for deactivated-61356eb4a76c8
deactivated-61356eb4a76c8

1021

Forum Posts

679

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

As long as its Rome 2 they can't fail in my book.

Avatar image for alexw00d
AlexW00d

7604

Forum Posts

3686

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#6  Edited By AlexW00d

Rezzed is Eurogamer and Rock Paper Shotgun btw.

Avatar image for turambar
Turambar

8283

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#7  Edited By Turambar
@MocBucket62 said:
@ShaneDev: I would actually like to see this, Greece: Total War. This isn't really like Rome where the Greeks are represented as the Greek Cities, but have each city state be a different faction. Like you can play as the Spartans and have them battle against the Persian forces in the Battle of Thermopylae. It can even go from ancient Greece's beginnings to Alexander's empire (Yes I know they did that with Rome Total War Alexander, but they can improve from that with this). 
How would you differentiate unit types?  Shogun 2 was already kind of suffering in that department.
Avatar image for alistercat
alistercat

8531

Forum Posts

7626

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 27

#8  Edited By alistercat

Oooh. I was thinking of going to Rezzed. I knew they'd be there. Brighton Centre.

Avatar image for joeybagad0nutz
joeybagad0nutz

1500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By joeybagad0nutz

If this is turns out to be Rome 2..... I might need to buy a new computer......

Avatar image for pyromagnestir
pyromagnestir

4507

Forum Posts

103

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 23

#10  Edited By pyromagnestir

@jelekeloy said:

I thought the title was implying that there would be a futuristic Total War game. That is a game I would like to see.

Me too. I'd really like to see what that would be like.

Avatar image for mocbucket62
MocBucket62

2689

Forum Posts

1106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 7

#11  Edited By MocBucket62
@Turambar: You still have the Persians who fought the Spartans and Athentians. For the Alexander section, you have the Egyptians and Assyrians who can serve as factions with different unit types compared to the Greek factions. Oh and there would be differences between the Creek City states. Yes both Sparta and Athens had hoplites, but Athens was way more diverse in military organization as they used cavalry and peltasts, though the Spartans would obviously be much stronger in infantry and spearman units.
Avatar image for winternet
Winternet

8454

Forum Posts

2255

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#12  Edited By Winternet

And people talk about Square Enix milking the Final Fantasy franchise.

Avatar image for jimbo
Jimbo

10472

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#13  Edited By Jimbo
@MocBucket62 said:
@ShaneDev: I would actually like to see this, Greece: Total War. This isn't really like Rome where the Greeks are represented as the Greek Cities, but have each city state be a different faction. Like you can play as the Spartans and have them battle against the Persian forces in the Battle of Thermopylae. It can even go from ancient Greece's beginnings to Alexander's empire (Yes I know they did that with Rome Total War Alexander, but they can improve from that with this). 
Have you played Hegemony? It's pretty good. Better than Total War in some ways, imo.
Avatar image for warxsnake
warxsnake

2720

Forum Posts

33

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#14  Edited By warxsnake

I'm a Total War fan but I gotta say the last two major releases (Empire and Shogun2), I haven't been too interested in. I played both and was like meh. Neither grabbed me like MTW2 or Rome TW.  
 
Kinda wishing they would scrap most of their design and refresh the game mechanics a little bit, it's becoming more of the same.

Avatar image for jace
Jace

1154

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#15  Edited By Jace

@Winternet: Did you just honestly compare CA to Activision? That's the dumbest thing I've read today.

On topic, I hope we get Rome 2 as well. Although, I'd be happy with a different setting.

Avatar image for jimbo
Jimbo

10472

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#16  Edited By Jimbo
@Winternet said:

And people talk about Activision milking the Call Of Duty franchise.

They sure do.
Avatar image for winternet
Winternet

8454

Forum Posts

2255

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#17  Edited By Winternet

@Jace: One is a developer and another is a developer. So, yeah, kinda.

Avatar image for jace
Jace

1154

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#18  Edited By Jace

@Winternet said:

@Jace: One is a developer and another is a publisher. So, no, I didn't compare them.

At least you're aware you made an incoherent reference.

Avatar image for winternet
Winternet

8454

Forum Posts

2255

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#19  Edited By Winternet

@Jace: what? no. The point was "they sure do a lot of them Total War games".

Avatar image for jace
Jace

1154

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#20  Edited By Jace

@Winternet: No, your post seems to imply that you think CA is "milking" the Total War series in the same way that the CoD franchise is being milked.

This is obviously a false comparison for a slew of reasons. The main one being that Total War hasn't used the same engine for 7 games, and thus actually changes and evolves over time.

Avatar image for winternet
Winternet

8454

Forum Posts

2255

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#21  Edited By Winternet

@Jace: They slap the Total War name for the same reason they slap the Final Fantasy name.

Edit: but hey, you don't like it being COD. No problemo, I can change it.

Edit2: Done.

Avatar image for mocbucket62
MocBucket62

2689

Forum Posts

1106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 7

#22  Edited By MocBucket62
@Jimbo: I haven't but it looks like its up my alley when it comes to historically based strategy gaming. Too bad I have a MAC so I can't play Hegemony. Also... 
 
@Joeybagad0nutz said:

If this is turns out to be Rome 2..... I might need to buy a new computer......


 

Avatar image for turambar
Turambar

8283

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#23  Edited By Turambar
@pyromagnestir said:

@jelekeloy said:

I thought the title was implying that there would be a futuristic Total War game. That is a game I would like to see.

Me too. I'd really like to see what that would be like.

Well, the reason that wouldn't really work is that modern combat is very small squad based, while Total War has always dependent on large unit formation based battles.
Avatar image for thedudeofgaming
TheDudeOfGaming

6115

Forum Posts

47173

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 1

#24  Edited By TheDudeOfGaming

They either re-release a game, or they move it along, in which case it won't be Total War. But I'd rather see WWI Total War than Rome v2.0 Total War with shiny graphics. But then again, i might loose my shit when i actually see it...so we'll see.

Avatar image for turambar
Turambar

8283

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#25  Edited By Turambar
@Winternet said:

@Jace: They slap the Total War name for the same reason they slap the Final Fantasy name.

Edit: but hey, you don't like it being COD. No problemo, I can change it.

Edit2: Done.

Except it's called Total War specifically because it has destinctive mechanics that make it so.  A proper analogy would be comparing it to Firaxis "milking" Civilization, which is a fucking absurd accusation to make.
Avatar image for jace
Jace

1154

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#26  Edited By Jace

@Winternet said:

@Jace: They slap the Total War name for the same reason they slap the Final Fantasy name.

Edit: but hey, you don't like it being COD. No problemo, I can change it.

Edit2: Done.

.... You still don't get it. Never mind, I don't care. People make stupid claims on the internet all the time. You win.

Avatar image for winternet
Winternet

8454

Forum Posts

2255

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#27  Edited By Winternet

@Turambar: Firaxis doesn't release a proper new CIV game every year like Total War is now. Before they were doing alright, but these last 3/4 years they've been releasing one every year. It gets to a point that is too much. Hey, that's my opinion.

@Jace: yay I win! * excitement*

Avatar image for turambar
Turambar

8283

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#28  Edited By Turambar
@Winternet said:

@Turambar: Firaxis doesn't release a proper new CIV game every year like Total War is now. Before they were doing alright, but these last 3/4 years they've been releasing one every year. It gets to a point that is too much. Hey, that's my opinion.

@Jace: yay I win! * excitement*

They release one every two years, switching between locations each time.  They have been on this development cycle since the first Total War game.  This isn't a case of opinions, just incorrect facts.  The only wrinkle in fact has been Napoleon: Total War, which utilizes Empires assets very closely, close enough that it'd be reasonable to assume it was originally intended as an expansion for Empires but grew to a size that a standalone game made more sense.
Avatar image for pyromagnestir
pyromagnestir

4507

Forum Posts

103

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 23

#29  Edited By pyromagnestir

@Turambar said:

@pyromagnestir said:

@jelekeloy said:

I thought the title was implying that there would be a futuristic Total War game. That is a game I would like to see.

Me too. I'd really like to see what that would be like.

Well, the reason that wouldn't really work is that modern combat is very small squad based, while Total War has always dependent on large unit formation based battles.

What if they go so far in the future guns are useless, so swords and other things are the only thing you can kill someone with. And armies are huge again. And instead of horses, cavalry ride tanks! No, space horses! No, genetically engineered sea horses that can live on land! No. I don't know help me out here.

Avatar image for jace
Jace

1154

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#30  Edited By Jace

@Winternet: How ON EARTH can you say CA is milking a franchise that goes through major technical and conceptual changes at least every other release?

Avatar image for turambar
Turambar

8283

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#31  Edited By Turambar
@pyromagnestir said:

@Turambar said:

@pyromagnestir said:

@jelekeloy said:

I thought the title was implying that there would be a futuristic Total War game. That is a game I would like to see.

Me too. I'd really like to see what that would be like.

Well, the reason that wouldn't really work is that modern combat is very small squad based, while Total War has always dependent on large unit formation based battles.

What if they go so far in the future guns are useless, so swords and other things are the only thing you can kill someone with. And armies are huge again. And instead of horses, cavalry ride tanks! No, space horses! No, genetically engineered sea horses that can live on land! No. I don't know help me out here.

So basically Mythology: Total War. I would be okay with this.
Avatar image for winternet
Winternet

8454

Forum Posts

2255

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#32  Edited By Winternet

@Turambar: I'm sorry, maybe the internet is giving me false data, but Empire: Total War released on Mar. 4th, 2009 ; Napolean: Total War released on Feb. 23, 2010 ; Total War: Shogun 2 released on Mar. 26, 2011.

Avatar image for alexw00d
AlexW00d

7604

Forum Posts

3686

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#33  Edited By AlexW00d

@AlisterCat said:

Oooh. I was thinking of going to Rezzed. I knew they'd be there. Brighton Centre.

I wanna do the same, but it'd cost like 3 times the price of the the ticket to get in to actually travel to Brighton.

Avatar image for turambar
Turambar

8283

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#34  Edited By Turambar
@Winternet said:

@Turambar: I'm sorry, maybe the internet is giving me false data, but Empire: Total War released on Mar. 4th, 2009 ; Napolean: Total War released on Feb. 23, 2010 ; Total War: Shogun 2 released on Mar. 26, 2011.

And like I said, Napolean is more than likely an expansion that grew too large and ended up as a standalone game, considering its direct usage of of Empires assets that could be seen in previous expansions for Rome and Medieval 2.  Further, that remains the only anomaly in the entire cycle and the difference between Empires and Shogun II is very big, far more so any change between the Modern Warfare games that you were so eager to compare it to.
Avatar image for pyromagnestir
pyromagnestir

4507

Forum Posts

103

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 23

#35  Edited By pyromagnestir

@Turambar said:

@pyromagnestir said:

@Turambar said:

@pyromagnestir said:

@jelekeloy said:

I thought the title was implying that there would be a futuristic Total War game. That is a game I would like to see.

Me too. I'd really like to see what that would be like.

Well, the reason that wouldn't really work is that modern combat is very small squad based, while Total War has always dependent on large unit formation based battles.

What if they go so far in the future guns are useless, so swords and other things are the only thing you can kill someone with. And armies are huge again. And instead of horses, cavalry ride tanks! No, space horses! No, genetically engineered sea horses that can live on land! No. I don't know help me out here.

So basically Mythology: Total War. I would be okay with this.

I guess I was thinking something more along the lines of Star Wars: Total War, to break my idea down to its core, only without the laser guns and the force, but that would be totally cool too.

Something a little goofy as a change of pace, but still totally (I see it, and I'm keeping it) kick ass.

Avatar image for turambar
Turambar

8283

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#36  Edited By Turambar
@pyromagnestir said:

@Turambar said:

@pyromagnestir said:

@Turambar said:

@pyromagnestir said:

@jelekeloy said:

I thought the title was implying that there would be a futuristic Total War game. That is a game I would like to see.

Me too. I'd really like to see what that would be like.

Well, the reason that wouldn't really work is that modern combat is very small squad based, while Total War has always dependent on large unit formation based battles.

What if they go so far in the future guns are useless, so swords and other things are the only thing you can kill someone with. And armies are huge again. And instead of horses, cavalry ride tanks! No, space horses! No, genetically engineered sea horses that can live on land! No. I don't know help me out here.

So basically Mythology: Total War. I would be okay with this.

I guess I was thinking something more along the lines of Star Wars: Total War, to break my idea down to its core, only without the laser guns and the force, but that would be totally cool too.

Actually, now that I think about it, considering how fights end up working out in Dynasty Warriors Gundam (giant waves and masses of mass production units), Gundam: Total War, would be thematically fitting.  Oh god, I just ruined all future Total War games for myself.
Avatar image for pyromagnestir
pyromagnestir

4507

Forum Posts

103

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 23

#37  Edited By pyromagnestir

@Turambar said:

@pyromagnestir said:

@Turambar said:

@pyromagnestir said:

@Turambar said:

@pyromagnestir said:

@jelekeloy said:

I thought the title was implying that there would be a futuristic Total War game. That is a game I would like to see.

Me too. I'd really like to see what that would be like.

Well, the reason that wouldn't really work is that modern combat is very small squad based, while Total War has always dependent on large unit formation based battles.

What if they go so far in the future guns are useless, so swords and other things are the only thing you can kill someone with. And armies are huge again. And instead of horses, cavalry ride tanks! No, space horses! No, genetically engineered sea horses that can live on land! No. I don't know help me out here.

So basically Mythology: Total War. I would be okay with this.

I guess I was thinking something more along the lines of Star Wars: Total War, to break my idea down to its core, only without the laser guns and the force, but that would be totally cool too.

Actually, now that I think about it, considering how fights end up working out in Dynasty Warriors Gundam (giant waves and masses of mass production units), Gundam: Total War, would be thematically fitting. Oh god, I just ruined all future Total War games for myself.

Holy shit! Giant armies made up of giant robots fighting with swords! YES!!!!!!!!!!! Cavalry would ride on giant robot horses and they could fight in space! I like this.

Avatar image for winternet
Winternet

8454

Forum Posts

2255

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#38  Edited By Winternet

@Turambar: You can dress it however you want. They released 3 full retail games in 3 years. I find it a tad too much. That's it. But, hey, you guys are happy with that and you're the ones buying them so they must be doing something right.

Avatar image for turambar
Turambar

8283

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#39  Edited By Turambar
@pyromagnestir said:

@Turambar said:

@pyromagnestir said:

@Turambar said:

@pyromagnestir said:

@Turambar said:

@pyromagnestir said:

@jelekeloy said:

I thought the title was implying that there would be a futuristic Total War game. That is a game I would like to see.

Me too. I'd really like to see what that would be like.

Well, the reason that wouldn't really work is that modern combat is very small squad based, while Total War has always dependent on large unit formation based battles.

What if they go so far in the future guns are useless, so swords and other things are the only thing you can kill someone with. And armies are huge again. And instead of horses, cavalry ride tanks! No, space horses! No, genetically engineered sea horses that can live on land! No. I don't know help me out here.

So basically Mythology: Total War. I would be okay with this.

I guess I was thinking something more along the lines of Star Wars: Total War, to break my idea down to its core, only without the laser guns and the force, but that would be totally cool too.

Actually, now that I think about it, considering how fights end up working out in Dynasty Warriors Gundam (giant waves and masses of mass production units), Gundam: Total War, would be thematically fitting. Oh god, I just ruined all future Total War games for myself.

Holy shit! Giant armies made up of giant robots fighting with swords! YES!!!!!!!!!!! Cavalry would ride on giant robot horses and they could fight in space! I like this.

You have no idea.
Avatar image for pyromagnestir
pyromagnestir

4507

Forum Posts

103

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 23

#40  Edited By pyromagnestir

@Turambar: All right now whatever they do I'm gonna be really disappointed.

Avatar image for alistercat
alistercat

8531

Forum Posts

7626

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 27

#41  Edited By alistercat

Anyone want to do a mini GB meetup at Rezzed?

Avatar image for alistercat
alistercat

8531

Forum Posts

7626

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 27

#42  Edited By alistercat

@AlexW00d said:

@AlisterCat said:

Oooh. I was thinking of going to Rezzed. I knew they'd be there. Brighton Centre.

I wanna do the same, but it'd cost like 3 times the price of the the ticket to get in to actually travel to Brighton.

I am lucky enough to live there and or near there.

Avatar image for mocbucket62
MocBucket62

2689

Forum Posts

1106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 7

#43  Edited By MocBucket62
@AlisterCat: Dude, I would freaking love to meet up at Rezzed to see what each company has in store. I am away though for a volunteer project that I'm looking forward too while Rezzed takes place.