Game critics and Game Journalists

Avatar image for mariussmit
mariussmit

297

Forum Posts

349

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 4

#1  Edited By mariussmit

This morning while reading a post on another game site, I started wondering about video game journalism and critique as opposed to other entertainment journalism and critique. In the movie industry, movie journalists visit the major film festivals, dig up celebrity gossip and visit movie premieres but are never the ones that review movies for publications. Movie reviewers on the other hand are a whole separate breed and although they visit movie events like the ones mentioned it is usually with the goal to review them or to form an opinion for upcoming award shows. Now I'm not saying that the movie industry is perfect by any means, but shouldn't the games industry follow suit and not let the same guys that rub shoulders with developers at trade-shows be the same ones to review those games later? I'm not making any allegations about fixed review scores here, it is just a question about conflict of interest. If the video game model was followed by the movie industry you would have Roger Ebert as a host on E! and Ryan Seacrest reviewing. Both are great at their jobs, but can one person typically be great at both and do so without one influencing the other? I'd love to hear your thoughts on why this specialization has not occurred in the video games industry and what you think the effect may be.

Avatar image for hitmanagent47
HitmanAgent47

8553

Forum Posts

25

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#2  Edited By HitmanAgent47

What a great point, I never thought of it that way.  
 
Then again who is going to write the preview of the game? journalist? Not the game reviewers? They can't give their impressions if they can't play the games. Videogames are interactive, movies are not.

Avatar image for hellbrendy
HellBrendy

1425

Forum Posts

111

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#3  Edited By HellBrendy

I've been thinking the same thing. So yeah, I totally agree. 

Avatar image for theblindchessman
TheBlindChessman

250

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By TheBlindChessman

I take your point, but I think it just depends how profesional the reviewers are.
 
Jeff certainly didn't cut Tron any slack

Avatar image for geekcore
Geekcore

117

Forum Posts

4566

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 30

#5  Edited By Geekcore

I think that it is a question of man/woman power. Most sites just don't have the money to have people just covering events andpeople just reviewing games. Even at bigger sites there is a lot of bleed over between the two departments. 
 
I think your point is valid, but at this point in the industry, it's just unrealistic.
 
Also, (former 1up writer) Sharky's did a whiteboard video about this issue. It's not a solution or anything, but it is one journalist's view on this issue.  

http://gamevideos.1up.com/video/id/29448  

Avatar image for ghostlyenigma
GhostlyEnigma

272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#6  Edited By GhostlyEnigma

Despite all of that, game journalist are still A LOT more reiable than metacritic's user reviewers. 

Avatar image for professoress
ProfessorEss

7962

Forum Posts

160

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

#7  Edited By ProfessorEss
@TheBlindChessman said:

 Jeff certainly didn't cut Tron any slack "

We can't be totally sure of that, not even Jeff can really. Maybe Tron's would've been a 2-star game if it wasn't for the relationship? 
But I digress.
 
Game journalism is so effed up I don't even really know how one would go about fixing it up. Currently the only answer I see is to leave it how it is, take it with a grain of salt, and try to have fun with it.
 
That's probably why I gravitate towards Giant Bomb. Maybe they get a fact wrong here and there, miss a story or event, or breeze past things I would like a deeper look at but at least they seem to be having some fun with it.
Avatar image for dragonzord
dragonzord

846

Forum Posts

362

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#8  Edited By dragonzord
@TheBlindChessman said:
" I take your point, but I think it just depends how profesional the reviewers are.  Jeff certainly didn't cut Tron any slack "
Mickey should've been the same rating if not more than Tron. That's all I'm saying.
Avatar image for tonicbh
TonicBH

348

Forum Posts

115

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 4

#9  Edited By TonicBH

Most game sites already do that. 90% of the time, the reviewer does not go to previews or trade show events involving said game.

Avatar image for supermarius
Supermarius

1223

Forum Posts

821

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#10  Edited By Supermarius
@murse2008 said:
" This morning while reading a post on another game site, I started wondering about video game journalism and critique as opposed to other entertainment journalism and critique. In the movie industry, movie journalists visit the major film festivals, dig up celebrity gossip and visit movie premieres but are never the ones that review movies for publications. Movie reviewers on the other hand are a whole separate breed and although they visit movie events like the ones mentioned it is usually with the goal to review them or to form an opinion for upcoming award shows. Now I'm not saying that the movie industry is perfect by any means, but shouldn't the games industry follow suit and not let the same guys that rub shoulders with developers at trade-shows be the same ones to review those games later? I'm not making any allegations about fixed review scores here, it is just a question about conflict of interest. If the video game model was followed by the movie industry you would have Roger Ebert as a host on E! and Ryan Seacrest reviewing. Both are great at their jobs, but can one person typically be great at both and do so without one influencing the other? I'd love to hear your thoughts on why this specialization has not occurred in the video games industry and what you think the effect may be. "
i don't think you are right about movie reviewers being separate from movie news writers.  There is overlap especially with smaller review sites. 
Avatar image for eurobum
Eurobum

487

Forum Posts

2393

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#12  Edited By Eurobum
@TonicBH said:
" Most game sites already do that. 90% of the time, the reviewer does not go to previews or trade show events involving said game. "
Yes, I've heard the same discussion on the last 1UP podcast. 
 
This policy isn't perfect. If the reviewer didn't hear about preview coverage, then he isn't really representative of the audience, which has been exposed to the hype. Example:
A blank slate reviewer might write a glowing review for a good game, while we the people -exposed to the hype and preview promises- might feel disappointed or even betrayed.  
 
Great thing about GB, is that the reviewers possibly got over the desire to please everyone and past the worry about careful developer relations. This has to do with  maturation, smartening up, developing an integrity - something that fake, pretty twenty-somethings on other sites simply can't deliver. Mostly because they were hired to be a face and a voice and instantly appeal to a young audience. Conflict of interest policies aren't going to remove their nativity or their youthful desire to please, belong and conform.