Games are (too) expensive!!!
Games are expensive. To buy I mean.
With the recession thing going on, people have less hard earned cash to spend.
I think reviewers should take that in consideration.
Is a game worth buying? Is there enough replayablility?
No I don't think they should take that into consideration, because every mans budget differs, so for them to say 'its worth the money to X degree' would not apply to everyone. Hell, they get their games for free anyways.
Games are not too expensive IMO, they are well priced. Look what you are getting in some of these games, its huge.
Actually, price is oftentimes a factor in the review text, but not the review score. This is because you can (arguably) compare games directly with a quick glance at the scores, but cannot do so with written text. If scores were shifted up or down based on price, you would have budget titles looking like awesome games, and big-budget titles looking like crap, when it's usually just the opposite.
In the review text, a good reviewer will usually note if the title is discounted in any way, or has a steep entry price (say, due to a peripheral bundled with it), and then assesses whether or not the game is worth the entry price. Things like replayability and whether it's worth buying are always, always addressed in a review. What, exactly, is the complaint here?
I think (most) retail games are reasonably priced, considering development cost.
It could be an issue to judge the value of some games though, particularly downloaded console games (PSN, XBLA, etc).
I rarely buy games when they just come out, I usually wait awhile, if I need to play it now so that my friends dont spoil it for me I rent it and buy at a lower price down the road.
Games aren't as much as they used to be years ago. "While most PlayStation games rarely exceeded $50, N64 titles could reach $79.99" (Wikipedia) That was before all these limited editions with extra stuff... So right now, the price of games are not as bad as some people make it seem. Plus in other countries, a single game will retail for about $100... I'd say right now we have it pretty easy. I would recommend saving your money, buying what games you "must have," and either wait for price drops or buy other games you want used.
"Games aren't as much as they used to be years ago. "While most PlayStation games rarely exceeded $50, N64 titles could reach $79.99" (Wikipedia)Yeah, I just read that a few days ago. It's a load of horseshit. Or, more accurately, a load of wikipedia. I payed $59.99 for a couple premier 3rd-party N64 titles, the rest were $49.99. Furthermore, there was an entire generation after that one (PS2, Gamecube) where games were 40 and (more often) 50 dollars. (I never owned the original Xbox.)
You're right about other countries, though. Games are cheaper here.
"is that why you start threads attempting to rationalize stealing games? http://www.giantbomb.com/forums/general-discussion/30/piracy-helps-selling-games/11417/
Games are expensive. To buy I mean.
With the recession thing going on, people have less hard earned cash to spend.
I think reviewers should take that in consideration.
Is a game worth buying? Is there enough replayablility?"
In Canada it's $40-$50 dollars for new PC games, which is fine by me.
The console games I think are a tad too expensive though being $70-$80 dollars, I'd like to see them be the same price as PC games.
"Some Reviewers have that on some of their reviews, called Value.
Games are expensive. To buy I mean.
With the recession thing going on, people have less hard earned cash to spend.
I think reviewers should take that in consideration.
Is a game worth buying? Is there enough replayablility?"
And I strongly Agree that today's brand new games are too expensive. I could barely keep up with the $49.99 games last gen.
"I think gamers already take this into account themselves. How many of us refuse to buy a game unless it gets 8s or higher across the board, maybe even 9s or higher?"I do that sometimes. If a game I've been looking forward to gets a 7 and another game i've also been looking forward to gets a 9, I'd get the latter.
"Yeah, I just read that a few days ago. It's a load of horseshit. Or, more accurately, a load of wikipedia. I payed $59.99 for a couple premier 3rd-party N64 titles, the rest were $49.99. Furthermore, there was an entire generation after that one (PS2, Gamecube) where games were 40 and (more often) 50 dollars. (I never owned the original Xbox.)Actually, I have a few friends who have said that prices for Atari games back in the day went for about $70. I also have heard from numerous sources that the Super Man game for the N64 did retail for about $70. It may have been just a few N64 games, but a few of them did exceed $60 according to multiple sources. Also, I found this article of console prices, which is pretty interesting to see as it compares absolute prices to inflation prices, (it's not prices of games themselves but it relates.)
You're right about other countries, though. Games are cheaper here."
A 6 or a 7 isn't really that bad of a score, but because we're talking about putting our 60 bucks down for these things, most gamers won't pay for a "pretty good" or an "okay" game.
Same goes for Giant Bomb. A game that gets 3 stars isn't bad, but most people won't consider buying a game unless they see it gets 4 or 5 stars.
"Gaming itself is too expensive, I try to focus mainly on the heavy hitters of gaming."A lot of us do that, and that's how we miss out. There could be a game that one of us would love, but we never play it because critics don't like it and it doesn't get a lot of word-of-mouth.
"Jordan23 said:Yeah I missed out on a couple of games last holiday season ( during that whole rush of new games) because I didn't have much money. I still haven't played Mass Effect yet. =("Gaming itself is too expensive, I try to focus mainly on the heavy hitters of gaming."A lot of us do that, and that's how we miss out. There could be a game that one of us would love, but we never play it because critics don't like it and it doesn't get a lot of word-of-mouth."
Yeah, the prices are high, but the used markets have the games cheap after awhile. I just buy them when they get down into the $40-ish price range or lower. I just got Lost Odyssey for about $35.
"KillerFly said:This is why I rarely buy Console games unless I really like them, usually just a rent play/beat them."Jordan23 said:Yeah I missed out on a couple of games last holiday season ( during that whole rush of new games) because I didn't have much money. I still haven't played Mass Effect yet. =(""Gaming itself is too expensive, I try to focus mainly on the heavy hitters of gaming."A lot of us do that, and that's how we miss out. There could be a game that one of us would love, but we never play it because critics don't like it and it doesn't get a lot of word-of-mouth."
And I'm done with the game.
There are only a few games that I would say are actually worth the $50 price tag. Unless it's a game that I really want, I will just wait for the price to drop (which usually happens fairly quickly with PC games).
"Jordan23 said:Good point. One game for sure that I can't miss out on is Little Big Planet. This game is going to be spectacular and most of the gaming community is excited as well."Gaming itself is too expensive, I try to focus mainly on the heavy hitters of gaming."A lot of us do that, and that's how we miss out. There could be a game that one of us would love, but we never play it because critics don't like it and it doesn't get a lot of word-of-mouth."
Check out this podcast... 1UP Yours Podcast
I feel that reviewers do take that into consideration. For example, Braid was knocked a lot for being $15. If most XBLM or PSN games were priced at retail value, they would be scored much lower. That's why you don't see games on WiiWare or PSN or whatever being rated extremely low. It's because the price matches the amount of game you're getting. Since all retail games are priced at $60, then they don't really have to factor that in, because it is a constant.
"Jordan23 said:"Gaming itself is too expensive, I try to focus mainly on the heavy hitters of gaming."A lot of us do that, and that's how we miss out. There could be a game that one of us would love, but we never play it because critics don't like it and it doesn't get a lot of word-of-mouth."
Oh well, there are so many things in life you're going to miss out on. The heavy hitters are generally your best bets for a good gaming experience.
"I think gamers already take this into account themselves. How many of us refuse to buy a game unless it gets 8s or higher across the board, maybe even 9s or higher?"for the most part I stick with franchises or certain developers. And then I will only get new games after they've been out for a while, or if a holiday comes up.
Definitely not.
Look at it this way, think of the cost of DVD's, around a fourth of the price of games, and your average game lasts a lot longer then four times the length of your average movie, and definitely offers a lot more entertainment.
At the end of the day, the more money we give to the games industry, the better the games will get.
Bionic Commando: Rearmed was like, £5. Games have always been expensive, if anything they're getting cheaper. Not just downloadable titles, but full retail titles too. And they're much, much cheaper when you consider inflation.
I guess my answer is, if you think games are too expensive today, you'll just have to buy them second hand or buy downloadable titles.
Games are definitely not expensive. Think of the massive production values, and the fact that if even one game bombs, a company can be put of business for good.
"KillerFly said:Yeah, that podcast alone should get people excited, lol!"Jordan23 said:Good point. One game for sure that I can't miss out on is Little Big Planet. This game is going to be spectacular and most of the gaming community is excited as well."Gaming itself is too expensive, I try to focus mainly on the heavy hitters of gaming."A lot of us do that, and that's how we miss out. There could be a game that one of us would love, but we never play it because critics don't like it and it doesn't get a lot of word-of-mouth."
Check out this podcast... 1UP Yours Podcast"
Disgaeamad said:
"Games are definitely not expensive. Think of the massive production values, and the fact that if even one game bombs, a company can be put of business for good."
I agree, it's a huge risk as well.
"Save up and buy a gun, then you can get all of your games for free."Seriously, everything this guy says is pure gold. XD
"Well the thing is, the more money the make, the more people they can hire and the better technology they can put in their next game, therefor giving us all a better game. An extra 5$ might not mean much to us but if a game sells 1 milion copies, thats 5 million fucking dollars!! Dude, $70 for a game? I work 6 hours (im a teen) and i get a game a can play for over a year and have a shitload of fun with.
Games are expensive. To buy I mean.
With the recession thing going on, people have less hard earned cash to spend.
I think reviewers should take that in consideration.
Is a game worth buying? Is there enough replayablility?"
Game reviewers should NOT take that into consideration. It is important to a certain degree and if a game has ALOT of replayablity like the warcraft games, battlefield 2, Sins of a Solar Empire, etc they should mension it. But by rating a game on price and replayablity is horible imo.
Game prices in the US <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<game prices in the rest of the world
Also, what the hell? Do you collect games? Do you get off of having shelves full of games you don't actually play, and never will, ever again? Buy games, play em till they aren't fun anymore, then sell them. Otherwise videogaming is just ridiculously expensive.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment