@kishinfoulux said:
Harmonix is hardly niche. C'mon now. They aren't Activision, but they aren't exactly some small indie upstart. If it's a hassle to bring back, that's just a sign they shouldn't bring it back. I don't have any sympathy for that cause. If they don't have the funds for it maybe they shouldn't do it.
Is Harmonix the smallest developer? Of course not. I never meant to infer that they are incapable of funding a project themselves. At this point in time, however, they are still a group that doesn't make a lot of games with widespread appeal and moneymaking potential. I understand why you are so off-put by this whole thing. On some level, a company directly asking for money to make a project--a project no one obviously sees enough financial potential in to fund--seems skeevy and unethical.
You're also absolutely right that the Amplitude Kickstarter got a huge amount of coverage across games media, from a variety of games writers who may seem slightly biased in the way they noted the public of the Kickstarter. This coverage likely got it funded (well, almost at this point). I can understand why this seems to go against journalistic integrity; why don't those writers cover all the Kickstarters, to ensure no bias? This is the one part of the issue that makes me a little squeamish, as I feel some good, well thought-out Kickstarters fail just because no one knows about them.
On the other hand, do these writers not get to act like human beings? Why can't they be really excited about something and want everyone else to be excited about it too? I don't necessarily like this concept that games writers should be these emotionless, perfeclty unbiased people who show no favor to one game over another. Everyone is going to be at least a little biased about certain games; the test of a true games writer is how they don't let that bias get in the way of the truth about a game or company. I like that these writers got passionate about a game they really used to love, even if it seems a bit favorable to one developer over another.
Everyone has to draw their line at some point; it just seems that you are in the minority for this issue. Is a bigger developer going to try this at some point, pushing the ethics of the whole thing too far for most people? Absolutely, and I hope that the backlash is as big as it deserves on that day. Kickstarter is, and always should be, a last resort for developers who can't get funding for their project any other way. It's a way for users to vet game ideas they want to see made and ignore those they don't care about.
I'm not trying to convince you or anything, but I wanted you to understand why someone can find this whole thing acceptable. In the end, it all comes down to how each of us feel about the whole thing on a personal level.
Log in to comment