#1 Posted by harinosho (665 posts) -
#2 Posted by Vager (1675 posts) -

Ya that's fine. It's a RSS feed mashup site. They just take a bunch of feeds from various gaming sites and put them in one spot.

#3 Posted by Gamer_152 (14278 posts) -

Yup, it's fine, they're just taking stuff from the RSS feed and putting it onto their site. Heck, sites are even allowed to host wiki data from Giant Bomb as long as it's done properly.

Moderator
#4 Posted by iam3green (14368 posts) -

it seems like they are feedback from what the site put up.

#5 Posted by CitizenKane (10677 posts) -

Meh, it's no Gamebomb.ru.

#6 Posted by Gav47 (1583 posts) -

@CitizenKane said:

Meh, it's no Gamebomb.ru.

Their forums allow sigs

Game Bomb - 1, Giant Bomb - 0

#7 Posted by iAmJohn (6141 posts) -

@Gav47: Dude come on, sigs are the worst.

#8 Posted by TEHMAXXORZ (1190 posts) -

@iAmJohn said:

@Gav47: Dude come on, sigs are the worst.

Seconded.

#9 Posted by Gav47 (1583 posts) -

@iAmJohn said:

@Gav47: Dude come on, sigs are the worst.

Check out the third post

Now are you really going tell me you don't want a BF3 animated gif, a sweet picture of a naked chick and and an awesome picture of a cat after every post you make?

I rest my case.

#10 Posted by Branthog (5717 posts) -
@Gav47 said:

@CitizenKane said:

Meh, it's no Gamebomb.ru.

Their forums allow sigs

Game Bomb - 1, Giant Bomb - 0

You're being sarcastic, right? I'm pretty sure you are. I hope you are.
#11 Posted by LiquidSwords (2728 posts) -

@Gav47 said:

@CitizenKane said:

Meh, it's no Gamebomb.ru.

Their forums allow sigs

Game Bomb - 1, Giant Bomb - 0

What are you, 15?

>2011

>Still using sigs

#12 Posted by valrog (3741 posts) -

@Gav47 said:

@CitizenKane said:

Meh, it's no Gamebomb.ru.

Their forums allow sigs

Game Bomb - 1, Giant Bomb - 0

Check my mini bio. Ba-dum tsh.

#13 Posted by CitizenKane (10677 posts) -

@LiquidSwords said:

@Gav47 said:

@CitizenKane said:

Meh, it's no Gamebomb.ru.

Their forums allow sigs

Game Bomb - 1, Giant Bomb - 0

What are you, 15?

>2011

>Still using sigs

To be fair, sigs can be pretty awesome. But they are also like MySpace: you give creative graphical control to people who shouldn't be wielding it.

#14 Posted by Karkarov (3539 posts) -

@Gav47: That is a mighty cute cat. You people must all be dead inside to resist his clear desire for sig love.

#15 Posted by Branthog (5717 posts) -
@CitizenKane said:

@LiquidSwords said:

@Gav47 said:

@CitizenKane said:

Meh, it's no Gamebomb.ru.

Their forums allow sigs

Game Bomb - 1, Giant Bomb - 0

What are you, 15?

>2011

>Still using sigs

To be fair, sigs can be pretty awesome. But they are also like MySpace: you give creative graphical control to people who shouldn't be wielding it.

The only acceptable sigs that should be allowed are text-only and even then, only of a limited length. There is no need for images.
#16 Posted by FlyingRat (1447 posts) -

Being able to watch the subscriber videos without being a premium member doesn't seem legal to me.

#17 Posted by Nate (798 posts) -

@FlyingRat said:

Being able to watch the subscriber videos without being a premium member doesn't seem legal to me.

Yeah this seems messed up. I don't pay for a membership, but I'm not going to go watch them for free over there. I can't justify cheating my favorite website like that. If I want to watch that premium content I should pay for it and support these guys.

#18 Posted by Swaboo (456 posts) -

@Gav47 said:

@iAmJohn said:

@Gav47: Dude come on, sigs are the worst.

Check out the third post

Now are you really going tell me you don't want a BF3 animated gif, a sweet picture of a naked chick and and an awesome picture of a cat after every post you make?

I rest my case.

THE WORST