@jazgalaxy said:
@duxa said:
Why does everyone say "If you dont include Kinect you will split the audience" ? It makes no sense, the audience is ALREADY SPLIT by mere fact that the games come out for PS4 as well, PS4 has no Kinect. Yes there are exclusives, but any 100% kinect game is as gimmicky as the WiiU tablet.
My point here is that Kinect even being in every box, most of the time will be as useless as a "Honk" button on Mario Kart WiiU tablet... Do we really expect any one of 3rd party titles that are coming out for both PS4 and X-bOneEighty to have unique features to utilize Kinect that are not simple, hey Billy we have this game coming out, why dont you spend a day coming up with things to tack on for Kinect?
Most of the games are 3rd party games, for them even with Kinect in every box the priority is to make it an amazing experience without Kinect (otherwise they wouldnt be able to sell to those without Kinect) AKA PS4 owners, and as of right now it seems like PS4 will have a larger market share (unless PS4's wheels fall off the bus before November).
I don't think you understand what MS is getting at.
All developers want to do is make money. They don't necessarily care about making games for "everyone". If Kinect proves popular, which it already has, and enough people have the units, developers will develop for it. So MS goal is to get as many units in the hands of users as possible.
Done.
It doesn't matter WHAT sony is doing.
I dont think any 3rd party will cut their potential sales in half (or more). Anyone with any business sense will develop for least common denominator. If SONY doesnt mess it all up (and MS doesnt pull an Ace out from their sleeve), they will be ahead on console sales, and a few years down the road when there are 30 million Xbox Ones out there, and 40 million PS4s, no sane developer will say, its ok we are going to sell to 30 million potential customers instead of 70 million. That would be incredibly stupid. Sure Microsoft can pay them 50 million dollars to cover those potential sales losses... but who is winning at that point? And how likely is MS to do that? They cant afford to do that with 10+ titles every single year thats billions they dont have.
And I think we can all agree that the age of exclusives died long ago, now its the age of timed exclusive DLC.
So yes, it does very much matter what Sony is doing.. just to give an extreme example. Some rumors floating around (Garnet Lee as source from last week's podcast) it was 8 to 1 ratio of PS4's to Xbox Ones.. (im sure the ratio is better now post the Xbox180, but I said this is an extreme example)... so if Sony keeps it up, developing a game with Kinect at its centerpiece would mean throwing away 7 out of 8 potential buyers... that suicide. Therefore developers will be forced to develop games that work on both platforms, and not all platforms have Kinect.
Kinect would only work in a "One Console" ecosystem... but that will never happen, even if Sony and Nintendo folds, PC will keep the pillars up... and if there is only 1 player in the market there will be a lot of others trying to jump into the fray... Steambox, apple, samsung?
Log in to comment