For me, it's not as simple "remasters are bad" or "remasters are good," it depends entirely upon the game and my situation. I passed on Tomb Raider because I played through that game twice in 1080p/60fps on PC. However, I am planning on getting the The Last of Us and am considering GTA V, despite having played both those games already.
The Last of Us is among my favorite games of last generation, and though I've played through it several times and have gotten the platinum trophy, there is one compelling reason for me to pick up the PS4 version; multiplayer. I really enjoyed the multiplayer in The Last of Us, but most of my gaming friends were on either 360 or PC, so the entirety of my time playing was with randoms. Several of those friends now have PS4s and have expressed strong interest in The Last of Us. So in the end, the prospect of experiencing this masterpiece again looking better than ever, playing the multiplayer (which I loved) with a group of friends, and getting a chance to play the new maps (which I never bought) is more than enough reason to spend $50 on a game I already own.
Though the majority of these remasters fall into the category of ambivalence for me, I'm sure there are those that have similarly compelling reasons to pick up Tomb Raider or Metro again, so even if I don't have interest in most of them, I see no problem with these remasters existing.
Log in to comment