SC2 Beta Hardware Analysis

Avatar image for teirdome
Teirdome

283

Forum Posts

6601

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#1  Edited By Teirdome

Tom's Hardware just put up a pretty interesting article doing some analysis on the SC2 beta and hardware performance, and it appears to be mostly CPU-bound at this point (still beta).  Basically you'll need a dual core faster than 2.0 GHz and you should be good to run on the highest settings.  I'd wager that you could build/buy a PC for between $400-600 that should run it on Ultra settings.  If you've already got the OS, cut $150 out of that price.  I'd also say 3 year old PCs should be able to run it pretty well.
 
Can anybody in the beta post their specs and how well it runs?  Partially to do some fact checking and help me decide what to put in a friend's HTPC.

Avatar image for jeffsekai
Jeffsekai

7162

Forum Posts

1060

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#2  Edited By Jeffsekai
  • OPERATING SYSTEM:WINDOWS 2.6.1.7600 ()
  • CPU TYPE:INTEL(R) CORE(TM)2 DUO CPU E6750 @ 2.66GHZ
  • CPU SPEED (GHZ):2.686
  • SYSTEM MEMORY (GB):3.999
  • GRAPHICS CARD MODEL:NVIDIA GEFORCE 8800 GTS 512
  • GRAPHICS CARD DRIVER:NVD3DUM.DLL
  • DESKTOP RESOLUTION:1680X1050
  • HARD DISK SIZE (GB):465.76
  • HARD DISK FREE SPACE (GB):242.076  
    Runs Flawlessly 
Avatar image for sodiumcyclops
sodiumCyclops

2778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#3  Edited By sodiumCyclops

CPU: Q9550 at 3.6ghz 
GPU: GTX 275 896mb 
RAM: 4gb 1066mhz 
 
Running on ultra settings at 1920x1200 at around 100+ FPS 
 
Seems like Blizzard designed this game to be run by anything.

Avatar image for teirdome
Teirdome

283

Forum Posts

6601

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#4  Edited By Teirdome
@Jeffsekai:@sodiumCyclops:   Thanks guys!
 
I'm darn impressed and it sounds like Tom's ratings are pretty far off.
Avatar image for geno
Geno

6767

Forum Posts

5538

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 3

#5  Edited By Geno
@Teirdome said:
" @Jeffsekai:@sodiumCyclops:   Thanks guys!  I'm darn impressed and it sounds like Tom's ratings are pretty far off. "
Unless the above people had AA off.  
 
AA has a pretty big effect on graphical quality and in turn is rather taxing. From Tom's 1920x1200 4xAA numbers it would seem this game is GPU-bound. I'm also rather surprised with their numbers, apparently this game runs almost as poorly as Crysis which gets 16fps at the same settings (whereas this game gets 21). Will have to see it for myself but from their numbers it doesn't look like anything short of a 5970 will be able to run it at 60fps at high settings :/.  
 

No Caption Provided

Though, Tom's had to force AA through driver so perhaps the developers will include an optimized AA option upon release. 
Avatar image for inf225
Inf225

515

Forum Posts

1882

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#6  Edited By Inf225

Windows Vista - Service Pack 1
Intel Core2 Quad @ 2.87GHz
2 GeForce 9800 512Mb (Not running in SLI)
2.5 Gbs RAM (not sure of speed)
 
Runs perfectly at full specs and at 1920 X 1080, some slight hitches at start but runs at solid 30-40 fps online, custom matches, etc.

Avatar image for jeffsekai
Jeffsekai

7162

Forum Posts

1060

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#7  Edited By Jeffsekai
@Geno: I had everything maxed
Avatar image for kaosangel-DELETED
KaosAngel

14251

Forum Posts

6507

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 3

#8  Edited By KaosAngel

A lot of players in Gold/Plat don't play on Ultra cause it's too bright and shit meshes together to easily.  It's either Mid/Low to make the game run faster and more efficient.  
 
I'm on the same boat, I got 2 high end gaming PCs as Desktops and a MBP that can run this flawlessly in Bootcamp, but I stick it to Mid/Low, what the fuck is up with Blizzard making shit all bright like WoW lately?  SC had a very unique colour style and should've kept it that way.

Avatar image for geno
Geno

6767

Forum Posts

5538

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 3

#9  Edited By Geno
@Jeffsekai said:
" @Geno: I had everything maxed "
Including AA?
Avatar image for jeffsekai
Jeffsekai

7162

Forum Posts

1060

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#10  Edited By Jeffsekai
@Geno said:
" @Jeffsekai said:
" @Geno: I had everything maxed "
Including AA? "
yep.
Avatar image for geno
Geno

6767

Forum Posts

5538

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 3

#11  Edited By Geno
@Jeffsekai said:
" @Geno said:
" @Jeffsekai said:
" @Geno: I had everything maxed "
Including AA? "
yep. "
That's odd then. I guess we'll have to wait until it comes out for a more definitive answer to how this game will run. Your result seems more accurate though, this doesn't look like a particularly graphically intensive game.