@Jay444111 said:
@FengShuiGod said:
Was listening to NPR on the way home from work, and they were talking about how the vidya game industry was so unoriginal, with all the sequels and whatnot. Hearing non gamers talk about video games really made me feel like my hobby was a total joke, and then I realized it kinda was, and then I realized why I kinda don't game anymore. So many games feel immature, repetitive, unoriginal, and poorly written. Even the Halo 4 stuff sounded like something out of a Saturday morning cartoon. I think a large constituency of gamers are exiting their teens, and they are starting to feel the same way, hence the vitriol.
Ugh... this... this post gave me a headache for how dumb it was man... It literally gave me a headache. Thanks a lot.
Video games make more money than any other storytelling industry on a constant basis.
Video game stories have been better than movie ones for quite a while now.
Video games have been copying off each other since the beginning of time.
Video games have been called immature by dumbasses only.
Whoever NPR is, they sound like massive dumbasses with a fanboy right here... Seriously... you gave me a very fucking bad headache with that post... it is so wrong that it actually did! Thanks a fucking lot!
NPR is National Public Radio here in the US. One of the few reputable, not right-wing talk media channels. Admittedly, they came across as a little out of their element when reporting on E3, but it's not like your post is a bastion of well reasoned thought.
Ok, video games make more money than any other story telling media. Other than the fact that it is perhaps not reasonable to compare video games to other storytelling mediums...so what? Since when is money made a barometer of quality? I'm sure Harry Potter has sold more than The Sound and The Fury ever will, but such numbers do not abrogate the aesthetic accomplishments of Faulkner, nor do they change the mediocrity of Harry Potter.
Video game stories have been better than movie ones for awhile now? Are you trolling? Such is sentiment is ultimately subjective, but are you going to insist video games have matched the narrative power of The Good The Bad and The Ugly, or 2001 A Space Odyssey, or Days of Heaven, or Five Easy Pieces, or Nashville, or Magnolia, ect.? Video games aren't movies, and I don't expect the same experience from such disparate mediums, but saying video games are better at narrative is like saying paintings sound better than movies. I don't expect amazing writing out of a game, and some of the best games, IMO, have little to no writing in them, but game stories are often much worse than they have to be.
Video games have been copying off each other since their inception, yes, just as every medium borrows from what came before it and evolves and (hopefully) improves via an iterative and cumulative process. I'm not saying everything in existence must blow my mind with it's amazing originality, but when a lot of stuff coming out is a sequel (3,4,5+) and doesn't look significantly different from its previous iterations or myriad other games in general, I'll call "unoriginal" on it.
Finally, video games have been called immature by dumb asses all too often, but that should not blind you to the fact that games (not all though!) are often immature. Many industry insiders, game developers, and lovers of video games have pointed this out as an obstacle to be overcome. I think even the BombSquad has brought it up. I think Patrick posted something like, "Are video games dumb?" in a post once. Last year during the E3 stream some devs, including Jaffe (I think), voiced their worries that video games might just be an empty calorie kind of thing, but they wanted them to be more. Acknowledging problems within the industry isn't a bad thing, and I hope it ultimately allows games as a whole to grow and improve.
Log in to comment