Strategy Vs. Tactics

#1 Posted by zhinse (164 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago

There's definately a difference between those two words. Which do you prefer and how would you define both words and types of gameplay? Which games use Strategy and which games use tactics.

#2 Posted by ZombieHunterOG (3528 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago

i use both im cunning like a fox 

but if i had to choose id say tactics :P 
#3 Posted by kmdrkul (3466 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago

I see strategy games as games like Rise of Nations, Civilization, etc.  I see tactical games as Tom Clancy's Vegas, CS, World in Conflict etc.

#4 Posted by zhinse (164 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago

i like strategy games but i was never all that smart or cunning, so I'm not all that great in them.  Positioning is a big thing in both genre, but i think i feel more impact when you get a good position in a more strategy esque game than a tactical esque game.

#5 Posted by Kush (8885 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago

Maybe the difference would be... Strategy = something planned beforehand. While Tactics = strategic elements being used in the moment. Honestly, I don't know what the hell I'm trying to say.

#6 Posted by zhinse (164 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago

That's the point of this thread. :D

#7 Posted by zh666 (53 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago

there is no difference, it's the same meaning.  Tactics just sounds better at the end of a game title, that's all.

Final Fantasy Tactics is a Turn-Based Strategy game, while Warcraft is a Real Time Strategy game.  They both use tactics, and you need to strategize with them both.  The ony thing that seperates the "Strategy" genre is if the game is real time or turn based, and then after that, if they're RPGs or not..

#8 Posted by xxNBxx (876 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago

Well all the games that have Tactics in the tittle are about the same.  Turn based, small number of units (around 15) that seem to have more of an RPG element to them.  Strategy is the genre, Tactics is the sub-genre in Strategy. 

Thats how I see it at least.

#9 Posted by MIALER_DAEMON (436 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago

I like homeworld

#10 Posted by Jayge_ (10222 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago
Kush said:
"Maybe the difference would be... Strategy = something planned beforehand. While Tactics = strategic elements being used in the moment. Honestly, I don't know what the hell I'm trying to say."
I get what you mean. I'm OK with strategy, but it tends to bore me. Micromanagement takes a lot of energy, although it's easy to get the hang of.

Tactics, on the other hand, I love. Thinking on your feat is way better, in my opinion. There's so much more skill involved.

zh666 said:
"there is no difference, it's the same meaning.  Tactics just sounds better at the end of a game title, that's all.

Final Fantasy Tactics is a Turn-Based Strategy game, while Warcraft is a Real Time Strategy game.  They both use tactics, and you need to strategize with them both.  The ony thing that seperates the "Strategy" genre is if the game is real time or turn based, and then after that, if they're RPGs or not.."
Wrong. It's like saying a magazine and a clip are the same; they aren't. And tactics/strategy are entirely different.
#11 Posted by OGCartman (4354 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago

Balls > Strategy + Tactics

U can map out how to do a battle, il be the dude just runs in there LEEERRROOYYY JEENNKKIINNSS and starts pwning ass

#12 Posted by Jayge_ (10222 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago

Leroy Jenkins got his bitch ass raped.

#13 Posted by zh666 (53 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago
Jayge said:
"Kush said:
"Maybe the difference would be... Strategy = something planned beforehand. While Tactics = strategic elements being used in the moment. Honestly, I don't know what the hell I'm trying to say."
I get what you mean. I'm OK with strategy, but it tends to bore me. Micromanagement takes a lot of energy, although it's easy to get the hang of.

Tactics, on the other hand, I love. Thinking on your feat is way better, in my opinion. There's so much more skill involved.

zh666 said:
"there is no difference, it's the same meaning.  Tactics just sounds better at the end of a game title, that's all.

Final Fantasy Tactics is a Turn-Based Strategy game, while Warcraft is a Real Time Strategy game.  They both use tactics, and you need to strategize with them both.  The ony thing that seperates the "Strategy" genre is if the game is real time or turn based, and then after that, if they're RPGs or not.."
Wrong. It's like saying a magazine and a clip are the same; they aren't. And tactics/strategy are entirely different.
"
then why isn't there a "tactics' genre on this site, gamespot or ANY site ever made like this? because it's not a genre!
#14 Posted by WilliamRLBaker (4767 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago

tactics are speciifcally a form of something a unit users, strategy is specifically what the unit is trying to do and how they will go about it.

#15 Posted by Jayge_ (10222 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago
zh666 said:
"Jayge said:
"Kush said:
"Maybe the difference would be... Strategy = something planned beforehand. While Tactics = strategic elements being used in the moment. Honestly, I don't know what the hell I'm trying to say."
I get what you mean. I'm OK with strategy, but it tends to bore me. Micromanagement takes a lot of energy, although it's easy to get the hang of.

Tactics, on the other hand, I love. Thinking on your feat is way better, in my opinion. There's so much more skill involved.

zh666 said:
"there is no difference, it's the same meaning.  Tactics just sounds better at the end of a game title, that's all.

Final Fantasy Tactics is a Turn-Based Strategy game, while Warcraft is a Real Time Strategy game.  They both use tactics, and you need to strategize with them both.  The ony thing that seperates the "Strategy" genre is if the game is real time or turn based, and then after that, if they're RPGs or not.."
Wrong. It's like saying a magazine and a clip are the same; they aren't. And tactics/strategy are entirely different.
"
then why isn't there a "tactics' genre on this site, gamespot or ANY site ever made like this? because it's not a genre!"
I'm talking in terms of gameplay, not genres. However, there are definitely games that fall into a Tactical genre.
#16 Posted by zhinse (164 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago

Yeah, tactics is basically a sub-genre to strategy. But the difference between gameplay is quite noticeable.

#17 Posted by chazer127 (213 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago

Stratagy = Rise of nations / warcraft 1-3 / Halo wars, so basicly games where you comand an army of forces and tacke over city ect
Tactics   = FF tactics / luminous arc / Fire emblam, basicly games that give you a set number of forces (usually 8 or 9) and give you mission to kill all of the oposing side in a small area

#18 Posted by Systech (4076 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago

I prefer to bash through the front door and see what happens.

#19 Posted by Jayge_ (10222 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago
chazer127 said:
"Stratagy = Rise of nations / warcraft 1-3 / Halo wars, so basicly games where you comand an army of forces and tacke over city ect
Tactics   = FF tactics / luminous arc / Fire emblam, basicly games that give you a set number of forces (usually 8 or 9) and give you mission to kill all of the oposing side in a small area"
Those are actually SRPG, or Strategy Role Playing Games, actually. Still considered strategy.
#20 Posted by jlaudio7 (326 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago

Strategy applies to a large group of people and usually takes place in large-scale battles. Tactics are used by a person or small group of people and are usually used outside of large-scale battles.

Starcraft uses strategy, Rainbow Six uses tactics.
This is obviously just my opinion.
also, I suck ass at strategy games, but I'm alright at tactics.
#21 Posted by zh666 (53 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago
chazer127 said:
"Stratagy = Rise of nations / warcraft 1-3 / Halo wars, so basicly games where you comand an army of forces and tacke over city ect
Tactics   = FF tactics / luminous arc / Fire emblam, basicly games that give you a set number of forces (usually 8 or 9) and give you mission to kill all of the oposing side in a small area"
all strategy games...
#22 Posted by chazer127 (213 posts) - 4 years, 8 months ago
Jayge said:
"chazer127 said:
"Stratagy = Rise of nations / warcraft 1-3 / Halo wars, so basicly games where you comand an army of forces and tacke over city ect
Tactics   = FF tactics / luminous arc / Fire emblam, basicly games that give you a set number of forces (usually 8 or 9) and give you mission to kill all of the oposing side in a small area"
Those are actually SRPG, or Strategy Role Playing Games, actually. Still considered strategy."
well im stupid...
Please Log In

Use your keyboard!

  • ESC